Situation: Food is an “essential good.” The COVID-19 Pandemic has made us all acutely aware of this, now that we’re being told to shun restaurants and eat at home. But companies that process row crops into breakfast food have faced a topsy-turvy marketing climate in recent years. General Mills (GIS) and Kellogg (K) have had to endure an existential crisis because consumers chose to distance themselves from processed breakfast foods in favor of more nutritious, fresh, and “organic” offerings. This was partly because fewer families came together each day for a sit-down breakfast. People became concerned about sugars being added to so much of what we eat, as well as the preservatives and obscure ingredients (like dyes) listed on each box of cereal. Debates arose about nutritional value and safety for children. Now, several years after the fact, those former icons of the food industry have admitted their failures and are marketing foods that are demonstrably good for children and contain no obscure or unsafe ingredients. Cereals contain dried strawberries or blueberries, sliced almonds, and other fruits or nuts. Serious investors welcome this state of affairs because changes in consumer behavior create volatility in the market, which translates into opportunity. And who’s to argue against a wider choice of more healthy foods? But for the casual investor, who doesn’t devote hours a week to following the food industry, this is not a good thing. Now is a good time to look at the food and agriculture companies that are left standing.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze food and agriculture-related companies that have an A- or better S&P rating on their bonds, as well as B+/M or better S&P ratings on their stocks.
Execution: See Table.
Administration: Four of the 12 companies appear to offer exceptional value: Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), Walmart (WMT) and Target (TGT). Those are all Dividend Achievers as well as being listed in the S&P 100 Index (OEF), the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index (VYM), and the iShares Top 200 Value Index (IWX) (see Columns AL to AO of the Table).
Bottom Line: Companies close to the production of raw commodities have stock prices that tend to follow the commodity cycle, which is dominated by oil. Investors in Deere (DE) and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) profit if the farmer profits. Investors in food processors and grocery stores face a fickle food consumer, whose only concern is to get the best taste and nutrition per dollar. The companies that have proven they can persevere in that arena are Hormel Foods (HRL), Costco Wholesale (COST), Coca-Cola (KO), Target (TGT), Hershey (HSY), Walmart (WMT), and PepsiCo (PEP). Those companies will still be doing well 10 years from now.
Risk Rating: 7 (10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into COST, UNP, KO, WMT and CAT, and also own shares of DE, BRK-B, TGT and PEP.
The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk. Show all posts
Sunday, March 29
Month 105 - A-rated Companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average - March 2020
Situation: If you’ve been picking stocks for a retirement portfolio, and have more than 15 years of experience, you’ve learned enough about risk to appreciate last month’s blog about Haven Stocks (Month 104). You’re probably ready to take on more risk for more reward, assuming that you’ve learned how to ride out a market crash without selling. Warren Buffett, the reigning value investor, also stretches beyond investing in large-capitalization value stocks like those discussed in our Month 103 blog about Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio.
In his most recent Annual Letter to the shareowners of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren explains how to do that by focusing on Retained Earnings (see the excerpt below in Appendix). Retained Earnings are what’s left over from Free Cash Flow after Dividends have been paid. Free Cash Flow is what’s left over from Operating Earnings (EBIT) after Capital Expenditures have been paid. Warren Buffett uses Return on Net Tangible Capital to estimate whether Retained Earnings are likely to be substantial. Return on Net Tangible Capital is the same as the familiar ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) except that Capital Employed is changed from Total Assets minus Current Liabilities to Total Assets minus Intangible Assets minus Current Liabilities. He thinks 20% is a good Return on Net Tangible Capital (see Column P in the Table).
The company’s CEO will eventually deploy Retained Earnings to build a better company faster. The cost for deploying that capital is zero. Going forward, the return on that investment is approximately the same as the return on Operating Earnings, which is EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) divided by Market Capitalization. In a well-managed and well-positioned company, that return represents a high rate of Compound Interest over time--the 20%/yr Return on Net Tangible Capital that Warren Buffett is looking to achieve in most years on most of Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio.
The trick, of course, is to find such companies. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a good place to start, given that those companies have traditionally been picked (in part) because they expected to have a high Free Cash Flow Yield (see Column H in the Table).
Mission: Pick companies from the 30-stock DJIA that have S&P ratings on the bonds they’ve issued that are A- or higher, and insert a new column in our Standard Spreadsheet for Free Cash Flow Yield (Column K). Exclude any DJIA companies that do not have an S&P stock rating of at least B+/M, or do not have the 16 year trading record that is required for quantitative analysis by the BMW Method (https://invest.kleinnet.com/bmw1/). (We display at Columns L-M in the Table a summary of BMW Method findings for the most recent week.)
Administration: see Table.
Bottom Line: These 19 companies have an aggregate Return on Net Tangible Capital of 19.5%, which almost meets Warren Buffett’s requirement of 20%. Whether any of these stocks can be bought at a “sensible price” is not an easy question to answer. Here at ITR, we call a stock “sensibly priced” if the 50 day moving average in the price per share is no more than twice the Graham Number (see Columns AC & AD) and is no more than 25 times the 7-yr P/E (see Column AF). Five companies meet those criteria: PFE, INTC, JPM, TRV, IBM.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, PFE, BA, KO, INTC, PG, JPM, WMT, JNJ, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of UNH, CSCO, AAPL, DIS, TRV and MMM.
Appendix: Excerpt from Warren Buffett’s February 2020 Letter to the shareowners of Berkshire Hathaway: “Charlie and I urge you to focus on operating earnings and to ignore both quarterly and annual gains or losses from investments, whether these are realized or unrealized...Over time, Charlie and I expect our equity holdings – as a group – to deliver major gains, albeit in an unpredictable and highly irregular manner. To see why we are optimistic, move on to the next discussion. The Power of Retained Earnings. In 1924, Edgar Lawrence Smith, an obscure economist and financial advisor, wrote Common Stocks as Long Term Investments, a slim book that changed the investment world. Indeed, writing the book changed Smith himself, forcing him to reassess his own investment beliefs. Going in, he planned to argue that stocks would perform better than bonds during inflationary periods and that bonds would deliver superior returns during deflationary times. That seemed sensible enough. But Smith was in for a shock. His book began, therefore, with a confession: “These studies are the record of a failure – the failure of facts to sustain a preconceived theory.” Luckily for investors, that failure led Smith to think more deeply about how stocks should be evaluated. For the crux of Smith’s insight, I will quote an early reviewer of his book, none other than John Maynard Keynes: “I have kept until last what is perhaps Mr. Smith’s most important, and is certainly his most novel, point. Well-managed industrial companies do not, as a rule, distribute to the shareholders the whole of their earned profits. In good years, if not in all years, they retain a part of their profits and put them back into the business. Thus there is an element of compound interest operating in favour of a sound industrial investment. Over a period of years, the real value of the property of a sound industrial is increasing at compound interest, quite apart from the dividends paid out to the shareholders.”
Warren concludes that history lesson on this note: “Charlie and I have long focused on using retained earnings advantageously. Reinvestment in productive operational assets will forever remain our top priority. In addition, we constantly seek to buy new businesses that meet three criteria. First, they must earn good returns on the net tangible capital required in their operation. Second, they must be run by able and honest managers. Finally, they must be available at a sensible price.”
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
In his most recent Annual Letter to the shareowners of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren explains how to do that by focusing on Retained Earnings (see the excerpt below in Appendix). Retained Earnings are what’s left over from Free Cash Flow after Dividends have been paid. Free Cash Flow is what’s left over from Operating Earnings (EBIT) after Capital Expenditures have been paid. Warren Buffett uses Return on Net Tangible Capital to estimate whether Retained Earnings are likely to be substantial. Return on Net Tangible Capital is the same as the familiar ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) except that Capital Employed is changed from Total Assets minus Current Liabilities to Total Assets minus Intangible Assets minus Current Liabilities. He thinks 20% is a good Return on Net Tangible Capital (see Column P in the Table).
The company’s CEO will eventually deploy Retained Earnings to build a better company faster. The cost for deploying that capital is zero. Going forward, the return on that investment is approximately the same as the return on Operating Earnings, which is EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) divided by Market Capitalization. In a well-managed and well-positioned company, that return represents a high rate of Compound Interest over time--the 20%/yr Return on Net Tangible Capital that Warren Buffett is looking to achieve in most years on most of Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio.
The trick, of course, is to find such companies. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a good place to start, given that those companies have traditionally been picked (in part) because they expected to have a high Free Cash Flow Yield (see Column H in the Table).
Mission: Pick companies from the 30-stock DJIA that have S&P ratings on the bonds they’ve issued that are A- or higher, and insert a new column in our Standard Spreadsheet for Free Cash Flow Yield (Column K). Exclude any DJIA companies that do not have an S&P stock rating of at least B+/M, or do not have the 16 year trading record that is required for quantitative analysis by the BMW Method (https://invest.kleinnet.com/bmw1/). (We display at Columns L-M in the Table a summary of BMW Method findings for the most recent week.)
Administration: see Table.
Bottom Line: These 19 companies have an aggregate Return on Net Tangible Capital of 19.5%, which almost meets Warren Buffett’s requirement of 20%. Whether any of these stocks can be bought at a “sensible price” is not an easy question to answer. Here at ITR, we call a stock “sensibly priced” if the 50 day moving average in the price per share is no more than twice the Graham Number (see Columns AC & AD) and is no more than 25 times the 7-yr P/E (see Column AF). Five companies meet those criteria: PFE, INTC, JPM, TRV, IBM.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, PFE, BA, KO, INTC, PG, JPM, WMT, JNJ, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of UNH, CSCO, AAPL, DIS, TRV and MMM.
Appendix: Excerpt from Warren Buffett’s February 2020 Letter to the shareowners of Berkshire Hathaway: “Charlie and I urge you to focus on operating earnings and to ignore both quarterly and annual gains or losses from investments, whether these are realized or unrealized...Over time, Charlie and I expect our equity holdings – as a group – to deliver major gains, albeit in an unpredictable and highly irregular manner. To see why we are optimistic, move on to the next discussion. The Power of Retained Earnings. In 1924, Edgar Lawrence Smith, an obscure economist and financial advisor, wrote Common Stocks as Long Term Investments, a slim book that changed the investment world. Indeed, writing the book changed Smith himself, forcing him to reassess his own investment beliefs. Going in, he planned to argue that stocks would perform better than bonds during inflationary periods and that bonds would deliver superior returns during deflationary times. That seemed sensible enough. But Smith was in for a shock. His book began, therefore, with a confession: “These studies are the record of a failure – the failure of facts to sustain a preconceived theory.” Luckily for investors, that failure led Smith to think more deeply about how stocks should be evaluated. For the crux of Smith’s insight, I will quote an early reviewer of his book, none other than John Maynard Keynes: “I have kept until last what is perhaps Mr. Smith’s most important, and is certainly his most novel, point. Well-managed industrial companies do not, as a rule, distribute to the shareholders the whole of their earned profits. In good years, if not in all years, they retain a part of their profits and put them back into the business. Thus there is an element of compound interest operating in favour of a sound industrial investment. Over a period of years, the real value of the property of a sound industrial is increasing at compound interest, quite apart from the dividends paid out to the shareholders.”
Warren concludes that history lesson on this note: “Charlie and I have long focused on using retained earnings advantageously. Reinvestment in productive operational assets will forever remain our top priority. In addition, we constantly seek to buy new businesses that meet three criteria. First, they must earn good returns on the net tangible capital required in their operation. Second, they must be run by able and honest managers. Finally, they must be available at a sensible price.”
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 27
Month 100 - The Clubhouse Turn: A-rated Companies in the 65-Stock Dow Jones Composite Index - October 2019
Situation: Last month, we came up with 10 stocks that are “safe and effective” bets for the neophyte stock-picker. Our starting point was the S&P 100 Index of the largest publicly-traded companies that benefit from price discovery through a robust market in stock options. Very large companies have the built-in safety feature of multiple product lines, which provide management with internal options for responding to an economic crisis. I excluded companies with less-than-stellar S&P ratings on the stocks and bonds they have issued, as well as companies trading for fewer than 16 years. I have also excluded companies with volatile stocks--those with a 3-yr Beta that is higher than 0.75--as well as companies that are not listed in both of the “value” sub-indices (VYM and IWD) for the Russell 1000 Index.
This month I’ve dialed back on those safety requirements by including stocks that likely carry more reward at the expense of greater risk. My assumption is that the stock-picker has accumulated 10+ years of experience and now needs to face up to the responsibility of carefully investing for retirement. The “savings race” has reached The Clubhouse Turn but she still needs guideposts for selecting safe and effective stocks.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet on only the companies in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average that have either issued bonds rated at least A- by S&P or carry no long-term debt on their balance sheet. (Those 65 companies are picked by a committee chaired by the Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal.)
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Five companies that met the above criteria had to be excluded because they lack information we need for analysis: a full 16+ years of trading records (V, AWK) or an S&P stock rating of at least B+/M (CVX, DD, MRK). One company, PepsiCo (PEP) has been added to the BACKGROUND section because it is the only company among last month’s list of 10 Starter Stocks that isn’t in the Dow Jones Composite Index.
Bottom Line: A mid-career stock-picker who doesn’t have a degree in accounting or business administration is at a disadvantage. It would be in her best interest to narrow her choices to the gold standard of stock-picker lists, which is the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Index, then further narrow her choices to companies that issue bonds rated A- or better by S&P and have at least a 16 year trading record for their stock. That leaves 28 companies to research. The goal, of course, is to find stocks that have outperformed the S&P 500 Index over the past 5 and 10 years while losing less value than the Index did in its worst year of the past 10. In other words, I’m suggesting that she should focus her research on the 9 companies that have no red highlights in Columns C through F of the Table: Microsoft (MSFT), UnitedHealth (UNH), Nike (NKE), Boeing (BA), Intel (INTC), Union Pacific (UNP), Disney (DIS), NextEra Energy (NEE), and American Electric Power (AEP).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, BA, UNP, NEE, JPM, INTC, KO, WMT, JNJ, PG, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of AAPL, CSCO, PFE, TRV, DUK, UPS, SO, MMM and XOM. So, I am invested in 22 of the 28 companies. It is difficult to follow that many companies, but it is nonetheless essential: Academic studies suggest that a stock-picker needs to be invested in at least 30 companies to have a good chance of matching market returns (see Columns C, F, and K in the Table) while enjoying less risk that the portfolio will lose value (see Columns D, I, and M of the Table).
APPENDIX: “Investment” is a nice word for the deployment of capital. As with any other capital expenditure, its effectiveness (profit margin) is what accountants call Operating Margin, which is Operating Income divided by Sales Revenue. Sales Revenue comes to the stock investor from dividends and the liquidation of shares. Operating Income is Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) “after paying for variable costs of production, such as wages and raw materials, but before paying interest or tax.”
As an investor who buys stocks, your variable costs of production are transaction costs (fees and commissions paid for purchase and sale of shares) plus rent/utilities/supplies for your “home office” and the cost of your business services (e.g. subscriptions to business magazines, newspapers, and websites). For money used to purchase stocks, EBIT is Gross Income (Sales Revenue after subtracting the variable costs of production) minus Depreciation (which is inflation).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
This month I’ve dialed back on those safety requirements by including stocks that likely carry more reward at the expense of greater risk. My assumption is that the stock-picker has accumulated 10+ years of experience and now needs to face up to the responsibility of carefully investing for retirement. The “savings race” has reached The Clubhouse Turn but she still needs guideposts for selecting safe and effective stocks.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet on only the companies in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average that have either issued bonds rated at least A- by S&P or carry no long-term debt on their balance sheet. (Those 65 companies are picked by a committee chaired by the Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal.)
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Five companies that met the above criteria had to be excluded because they lack information we need for analysis: a full 16+ years of trading records (V, AWK) or an S&P stock rating of at least B+/M (CVX, DD, MRK). One company, PepsiCo (PEP) has been added to the BACKGROUND section because it is the only company among last month’s list of 10 Starter Stocks that isn’t in the Dow Jones Composite Index.
Bottom Line: A mid-career stock-picker who doesn’t have a degree in accounting or business administration is at a disadvantage. It would be in her best interest to narrow her choices to the gold standard of stock-picker lists, which is the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Index, then further narrow her choices to companies that issue bonds rated A- or better by S&P and have at least a 16 year trading record for their stock. That leaves 28 companies to research. The goal, of course, is to find stocks that have outperformed the S&P 500 Index over the past 5 and 10 years while losing less value than the Index did in its worst year of the past 10. In other words, I’m suggesting that she should focus her research on the 9 companies that have no red highlights in Columns C through F of the Table: Microsoft (MSFT), UnitedHealth (UNH), Nike (NKE), Boeing (BA), Intel (INTC), Union Pacific (UNP), Disney (DIS), NextEra Energy (NEE), and American Electric Power (AEP).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, BA, UNP, NEE, JPM, INTC, KO, WMT, JNJ, PG, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of AAPL, CSCO, PFE, TRV, DUK, UPS, SO, MMM and XOM. So, I am invested in 22 of the 28 companies. It is difficult to follow that many companies, but it is nonetheless essential: Academic studies suggest that a stock-picker needs to be invested in at least 30 companies to have a good chance of matching market returns (see Columns C, F, and K in the Table) while enjoying less risk that the portfolio will lose value (see Columns D, I, and M of the Table).
APPENDIX: “Investment” is a nice word for the deployment of capital. As with any other capital expenditure, its effectiveness (profit margin) is what accountants call Operating Margin, which is Operating Income divided by Sales Revenue. Sales Revenue comes to the stock investor from dividends and the liquidation of shares. Operating Income is Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) “after paying for variable costs of production, such as wages and raw materials, but before paying interest or tax.”
As an investor who buys stocks, your variable costs of production are transaction costs (fees and commissions paid for purchase and sale of shares) plus rent/utilities/supplies for your “home office” and the cost of your business services (e.g. subscriptions to business magazines, newspapers, and websites). For money used to purchase stocks, EBIT is Gross Income (Sales Revenue after subtracting the variable costs of production) minus Depreciation (which is inflation).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, September 29
Month 99 - Starter Stocks - September 2019
Situation: When I started investing, I picked up the phrase “stocks for widows and orphans.” Typically, Probate Court will assign fiduciary responsibility for investments made on behalf of a widow or orphan to lawyer. I later became acquainted with one of those and learned that she expected after-inflation returns from low-risk stocks to be well over 5%/yr. But she hadn’t fully considered transaction fees, taxes, or the need to balance stocks 50-50 with 10-yr US Treasury Notes (to hedge against what could be a catastrophic loss for a widow or orphan). And, few stocks make suitable long-term holdings in a portfolio that is supposed to be immune to gambling. Given that a stock broker’s main talent is to wisely supervise gambling, a broker is likely to welcome the prospect of building a portfolio of “boring” stocks that will have little turnover.
Many young but upwardly mobile “salary workers” face the same problem that lawyer is facing: how to invest wisely without gambling. I have 4 children who are trying to grapple with this problem; none have gained lasting satisfaction from consulting investment advisors. And, they don’t much like my advice, which is to research the problem and find their own solution, which is called DIY investing. But, they already have the most important asset: which is to be disinclined to gamble.
Starter Stocks, like those for widows and orphans, are usually (but not always) boring. Consumer Staples are most likely to be Starter Stocks, and Utilities are close behind. But then you’ll find that technology-related companies start to pop up from Health Care and Information Technology industries.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to screen out companies that are missing from either of the two key value indexes, which are the iShares Russell 1000 Value Index ETF -- IWD and the income-oriented variant of the Russell 1000 Index that was created as the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index but is marketed in the US as the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF -- VYM. Companies that issue bonds having an S&P rating lower than A- are also excluded, as are companies that issue stocks having an S&P rating lower than B+/M. Stocks must have a 16+ year trading record, to allow quantitative analysis by the BMW Method.
Administration: Most of the strategies that are likely to give high returns from owning stocks in a bull market also carry a high risk of loss in a bear market. So, when the market falls 25% those stocks might fall 50%. That means a 100% gain would have to occur over ensuing years just to get back to where the stock was priced when the last bull market ended. Banking and Finance faculty at business schools teach that this strategy is the only legal way to beat the market. In other words, reversion to the mean growth rate is sacrosanct. One way for an investor to hedge against such volatility is to pick stocks that go up or down less than 75% as much as the S&P 500 Index. In other words, exclude stocks with a 3-yr Beta that is higher than 0.75. Another way is to pick stocks issued by very large companies, namely those found in the S&P 100 Index. To be included in that index, companies are required to have an active market in put and call options at the Chicago Board Options Exchange, which means that “price discovery” for the underlying stock is efficient and relatively well insulated from “momentum” investors who are trading on the basis of fleeting rumors or sentiment. The other advantage of very large companies is that they have multiple product lines, at least one of which is expected to produce an attractively priced product during a recession. Integrated oil companies, for example, maintain a fleet of refineries that would be paying less for their feedstock (oil) during a recession--thereby allowing the company to make a nice profit from selling gasoline at a lower price than the customer had been used to paying.
Bottom Line: The problem with screening for “Starter Stocks” is that you’ll pull up some that are broadly thought of as desirable. Both gamblers and non-gamblers will bid up such stocks but forget to sell them when shares become overpriced. Given that most Starter Stocks (see Table) are found in channels of the economy that are already saturated (i.e., companies can grow their revenues no faster than GDP grows), there is little reason to hold overpriced stocks in expectation that earnings will explode upward. For example, the stocks issued by all four of the Consumer Staples companies on our list (KO, PG, PEP, WMT) are overpriced (see Columns AB to AD in our Table). You’ll have to figure out when to buy (or sell) overpriced shares of such high-value stocks. A common strategy is to buy more shares when the price drops 5-10% below its usual range. This is called the buy the dip strategy.
The easiest (and probably best) way to be certain of buying shares when they’re bargain-priced is to do it automatically. Sign up for a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that takes a fixed amount of money out of your checking account on a specific date each month to buy more shares. That strategy is called dollar-cost averaging, and is the strategy that Warren Buffett favors to build a position in stocks that are often overpriced.
How well do our 10 Starter Stocks (at Line 10 in the Table) perform vs. the underlying ETFs -- VYM and IWD (at Lines 19 and 20)? Answer: quite a bit better (see Columns E, F and K).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, PG, INTC, WMT and JNJ, and also own shares of PFE, DUK, SO and PEP.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Many young but upwardly mobile “salary workers” face the same problem that lawyer is facing: how to invest wisely without gambling. I have 4 children who are trying to grapple with this problem; none have gained lasting satisfaction from consulting investment advisors. And, they don’t much like my advice, which is to research the problem and find their own solution, which is called DIY investing. But, they already have the most important asset: which is to be disinclined to gamble.
Starter Stocks, like those for widows and orphans, are usually (but not always) boring. Consumer Staples are most likely to be Starter Stocks, and Utilities are close behind. But then you’ll find that technology-related companies start to pop up from Health Care and Information Technology industries.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to screen out companies that are missing from either of the two key value indexes, which are the iShares Russell 1000 Value Index ETF -- IWD and the income-oriented variant of the Russell 1000 Index that was created as the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index but is marketed in the US as the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF -- VYM. Companies that issue bonds having an S&P rating lower than A- are also excluded, as are companies that issue stocks having an S&P rating lower than B+/M. Stocks must have a 16+ year trading record, to allow quantitative analysis by the BMW Method.
Administration: Most of the strategies that are likely to give high returns from owning stocks in a bull market also carry a high risk of loss in a bear market. So, when the market falls 25% those stocks might fall 50%. That means a 100% gain would have to occur over ensuing years just to get back to where the stock was priced when the last bull market ended. Banking and Finance faculty at business schools teach that this strategy is the only legal way to beat the market. In other words, reversion to the mean growth rate is sacrosanct. One way for an investor to hedge against such volatility is to pick stocks that go up or down less than 75% as much as the S&P 500 Index. In other words, exclude stocks with a 3-yr Beta that is higher than 0.75. Another way is to pick stocks issued by very large companies, namely those found in the S&P 100 Index. To be included in that index, companies are required to have an active market in put and call options at the Chicago Board Options Exchange, which means that “price discovery” for the underlying stock is efficient and relatively well insulated from “momentum” investors who are trading on the basis of fleeting rumors or sentiment. The other advantage of very large companies is that they have multiple product lines, at least one of which is expected to produce an attractively priced product during a recession. Integrated oil companies, for example, maintain a fleet of refineries that would be paying less for their feedstock (oil) during a recession--thereby allowing the company to make a nice profit from selling gasoline at a lower price than the customer had been used to paying.
Bottom Line: The problem with screening for “Starter Stocks” is that you’ll pull up some that are broadly thought of as desirable. Both gamblers and non-gamblers will bid up such stocks but forget to sell them when shares become overpriced. Given that most Starter Stocks (see Table) are found in channels of the economy that are already saturated (i.e., companies can grow their revenues no faster than GDP grows), there is little reason to hold overpriced stocks in expectation that earnings will explode upward. For example, the stocks issued by all four of the Consumer Staples companies on our list (KO, PG, PEP, WMT) are overpriced (see Columns AB to AD in our Table). You’ll have to figure out when to buy (or sell) overpriced shares of such high-value stocks. A common strategy is to buy more shares when the price drops 5-10% below its usual range. This is called the buy the dip strategy.
The easiest (and probably best) way to be certain of buying shares when they’re bargain-priced is to do it automatically. Sign up for a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that takes a fixed amount of money out of your checking account on a specific date each month to buy more shares. That strategy is called dollar-cost averaging, and is the strategy that Warren Buffett favors to build a position in stocks that are often overpriced.
How well do our 10 Starter Stocks (at Line 10 in the Table) perform vs. the underlying ETFs -- VYM and IWD (at Lines 19 and 20)? Answer: quite a bit better (see Columns E, F and K).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, PG, INTC, WMT and JNJ, and also own shares of PFE, DUK, SO and PEP.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, June 30
Month 96 - Watch List for S&P 100 Companies in the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index - June 2019
Situation: All investors have an objective as well as a plan to reach that objective. I started with the objective of getting my children through college, then moved on to having a comfortable retirement. Direct stock ownership has been a key part of both plans. Why stocks? Because mutual funds are sold on the basis of long-term performance records, not safety from market crashes. But a small group of stocks are relatively safe because of being issued by a large company that reliably pays a good and growing dividend. The trick is to have a Watch List of 20-30 such companies and know “the story” behind each company.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to evaluate companies in the S&P 100 Index that also appear in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, i.e., the ~400 companies in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index that reliably pay an above-market dividend. Our source document is the list of companies in VYM (the capitalization-weighted Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF,
which is the US version of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
Execution: see Table showing a spreadsheet with 36 columns of information for commons stocks issued by 27 US companies.
Administration: 54 companies are common to both indexes but 27 have been excluded from our Watch List because an item of information needed to populate a cell in the spreadsheet is missing and/or the company's S&P ratings are too low to denote above-average safety. We require an A- bond rating or better and a B+/M stock rating or better.
A key requirement is to avoid overpaying for a stock. I’m a numbers guy, so I use two numbers to decide if a stock is overpriced (where “price” or P is defined as the 50-day moving average):
1) the 7-yr P/E is greater than 30 (see Column AD in the Table.
2) the stock’s Graham Number, which is the square root of 22.5 times EPS (Earnings Per Share) multiplied by BV/Sh (Book Value Per Share), is greater than 250% of its price (see Column AB in the Table).
If only one of those two numbers is over the limit, the stock is still overpriced if the other number is close to the limit (more than 25 or 200%, respectively).
Another key requirement is to know whether a company's stock is a worthwhile investment, given its current price. As a starting place, I’ve devised a Basic Quality Screen that has only 6 elements and a maximum score of 4 (see Table):
1) If price appreciation over the past 16 years has been greater than 1/3rd the risk of short-term loss as determined by the BMW method, one point is added. In other words, 16-Yr price appreciation in Column K is greater than 1/3rd the risk in Column M.
2) If Tangible Book Value in Column S is negative and either LT-debt represents more than 50% of Total Capital (Column O), or Total Debt is more than 250% of EBITDA (Column P), one point is subtracted.
3) If the S&P Bond Rating in Column U is A- or better, one point is added.
4) If the S&P Stock Rating in Column V is B+/M or better, one point is added.
5) If Net Present Value of dividend growth (based on trailing 5-Yr dividend growth in Column H) and cash-out value after a 10 year Holding Period (determined by extrapolation of trailing 16-Yr price appreciation in Column K) is a positive number when applying a Discount Rate of 10% (see Column Z), one point is added.
6) If the two markers of an overpriced stock noted above (see Columns AB and AD) indicate that the stock is indeed overpriced, half a point is subtracted.
The final SCORE is found in Column AJ.
Bottom Line: As expected, these 27 companies have not performed as well as SPY, the S&P 500 Index ETF (see Line 29 to Line 35 at Columns C through F in the Table). But these 27 companies pay a higher dividend (Column G) and have lower price volatility (see Columns I & M) than SPY. Estimates for Net Present Value after a 10 year holding period (assuming a continuation of the trailing 5 year dividend growth rate and the trailing 16 year price growth rate and trading costs of 2.5% at the time of purchase and sale) were higher than SPY (see Column Z).
Conclusion: These 9 stocks appear to be over-priced (see Columns AB and AD): CSCO, KO, TXN, PEP, JNJ, LMT, MMM, CL and UPS. These 12 appear to be bargain-priced “value stocks” based on Book Value, Graham Number and average 7 year P/E (see Columns AA-AE): PFE, NEE, DUK, INTC, TGT, SO, JPM, CMCSA, USB, BLK, XOM and WFC. These 10 appear to be worthwhile investments because of having a score of either 3 or 4 on our Basic Quality Screen (see Column AJ): PFE, NEE, DUK, INTC, PG, SO, JPM, WMT, CAT, BLK.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Bonds = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, INTC, PG, JNJ, JPM, WMT, CAT and IBM. I also own shares of PFE, CSCO, DUK, SO, PEP, MMM, BLK, UPS and XOM. Note that all but two (BLK and PEP) of those 18 are in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to evaluate companies in the S&P 100 Index that also appear in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, i.e., the ~400 companies in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index that reliably pay an above-market dividend. Our source document is the list of companies in VYM (the capitalization-weighted Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF,
which is the US version of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
Execution: see Table showing a spreadsheet with 36 columns of information for commons stocks issued by 27 US companies.
Administration: 54 companies are common to both indexes but 27 have been excluded from our Watch List because an item of information needed to populate a cell in the spreadsheet is missing and/or the company's S&P ratings are too low to denote above-average safety. We require an A- bond rating or better and a B+/M stock rating or better.
A key requirement is to avoid overpaying for a stock. I’m a numbers guy, so I use two numbers to decide if a stock is overpriced (where “price” or P is defined as the 50-day moving average):
1) the 7-yr P/E is greater than 30 (see Column AD in the Table.
2) the stock’s Graham Number, which is the square root of 22.5 times EPS (Earnings Per Share) multiplied by BV/Sh (Book Value Per Share), is greater than 250% of its price (see Column AB in the Table).
If only one of those two numbers is over the limit, the stock is still overpriced if the other number is close to the limit (more than 25 or 200%, respectively).
Another key requirement is to know whether a company's stock is a worthwhile investment, given its current price. As a starting place, I’ve devised a Basic Quality Screen that has only 6 elements and a maximum score of 4 (see Table):
1) If price appreciation over the past 16 years has been greater than 1/3rd the risk of short-term loss as determined by the BMW method, one point is added. In other words, 16-Yr price appreciation in Column K is greater than 1/3rd the risk in Column M.
2) If Tangible Book Value in Column S is negative and either LT-debt represents more than 50% of Total Capital (Column O), or Total Debt is more than 250% of EBITDA (Column P), one point is subtracted.
3) If the S&P Bond Rating in Column U is A- or better, one point is added.
4) If the S&P Stock Rating in Column V is B+/M or better, one point is added.
5) If Net Present Value of dividend growth (based on trailing 5-Yr dividend growth in Column H) and cash-out value after a 10 year Holding Period (determined by extrapolation of trailing 16-Yr price appreciation in Column K) is a positive number when applying a Discount Rate of 10% (see Column Z), one point is added.
6) If the two markers of an overpriced stock noted above (see Columns AB and AD) indicate that the stock is indeed overpriced, half a point is subtracted.
The final SCORE is found in Column AJ.
Bottom Line: As expected, these 27 companies have not performed as well as SPY, the S&P 500 Index ETF (see Line 29 to Line 35 at Columns C through F in the Table). But these 27 companies pay a higher dividend (Column G) and have lower price volatility (see Columns I & M) than SPY. Estimates for Net Present Value after a 10 year holding period (assuming a continuation of the trailing 5 year dividend growth rate and the trailing 16 year price growth rate and trading costs of 2.5% at the time of purchase and sale) were higher than SPY (see Column Z).
Conclusion: These 9 stocks appear to be over-priced (see Columns AB and AD): CSCO, KO, TXN, PEP, JNJ, LMT, MMM, CL and UPS. These 12 appear to be bargain-priced “value stocks” based on Book Value, Graham Number and average 7 year P/E (see Columns AA-AE): PFE, NEE, DUK, INTC, TGT, SO, JPM, CMCSA, USB, BLK, XOM and WFC. These 10 appear to be worthwhile investments because of having a score of either 3 or 4 on our Basic Quality Screen (see Column AJ): PFE, NEE, DUK, INTC, PG, SO, JPM, WMT, CAT, BLK.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Bonds = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, INTC, PG, JNJ, JPM, WMT, CAT and IBM. I also own shares of PFE, CSCO, DUK, SO, PEP, MMM, BLK, UPS and XOM. Note that all but two (BLK and PEP) of those 18 are in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, April 28
Month 94 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Spring 2019 Update
Situation: Investors should pay attention to asset classes that fluctuate in value out-of-sync with the S&P 500 Index. Such asset classes are said to have minimal or negative “correlation” with large-capitalization US stocks. Emerging markets and raw commodities are important examples. Those are a natural pair, given that most countries in the emerging markets group have an economy that is based on the production of one or more raw commodities.
The idea that you can find a safe haven for your savings, one which will allow you to ride out a crash in the US stock market, is a pleasant fiction. Articles in support of that idea are published almost daily. But unless you are a trader who can afford to rent or buy a $500,000 seat on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, you probably aren’t deft enough to arbitrage the various risks accurately enough before they develop (and at low enough transaction costs) to avoid losing money in a crash.
If you really want to ride out most crashes, invest in a bond-heavy balanced mutual fund that is managed by real humans. The Vanguard Group offers one best, and it comes with very low transaction fees (Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund or VWINX). To refresh yourself on the competitive advantages of investing in food and agriculture companies, see our most recent blog on the subject (see Month 91). To refresh yourself on the competitive disadvantages, study this month’s Table and Bottom Line carefully.
The essential fact is that economies require money for spending and investment. That comes down to having consumers who are confident enough about their employment prospects and entrepreneurs who are confident enough about their ability to invest. Those consumers and entrepreneurs can be relied upon to transfer their successes to the larger economy by saving money, taking out loans, and paying taxes. National economies are interlinked. Because of the size and innovation of its marketplace, the US economy is the main enabler for most of the other national economies. Logic would suggest that the valuation for any asset class will roughly track the ups and downs of the S&P 500 Index, either as a first derivative or second derivative.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze US and Canadian food and agriculture companies that carry at least a BBB rating on their bonds (see Column R).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Of the 25 companies listed in the Table, only one meets Warren Buffett’s criteria of low beta (see Column I), low volatility (Column M), high quality (Column S), strong balance sheet (Columns N-R), and TTM (Trailing Twelve Month) earnings plus mrq (most recent quarter) Book Values that yield a Graham Number which is not far from the stock’s current Price (Column Y). That company is Berkshire Hathaway. We use a Basic Quality Screen that is less stringent as his: 1) an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better (Column S), 2) an S&P bond rating of BBB+ or better (Column R), 3) 16-Yr price volatility (Column M) that is less than 3 times the rate of price appreciation (Column K), and 4) a positive dollar amount for net present value (Column W) when using a 10-Yr holding period in combination with a 10% discount rate (to reflect a 10% Required Rate of Return).
Bottom Line: Only 8 companies on the list pass our Basic Quality Screen (see Administration above): HRL, COST, PEP, KO, DE, FAST, CNI, UNP. At the opposite end of the spectrum, 9 companies have a below-market S&P bond rating of BBB. So, those stocks represent outright gambles.
Aside from Berkshire Hathaway, none of the 25 companies can be said to issue a reasonably priced “value” stock. We’re dealing with 24 “growth” stocks, only a third of which are of high quality. Three of the 9 with BBB bond ratings have high total debt levels relative to EBITDA (see Column O in the Table) that are unprotected by Tangible Book Value (Column P): SJM, MKC, GIS. The good news is that only one of the 9 appears to be overpriced, and that company (MKC) is a quasi-monopoly that has little risk of bankruptcy because it has “cornered” the US spice market.
In summary, you can do well by investing in this space as long as you understand that you’re dealing with a fragmented food industry, one that is flush with companies of dubious quality. You might like to be well-informed about these companies because food, like fuel, is an essential good, and the food industry enjoys steady growth. Why? Because the number of people in Asia & Africa who can afford to consume 50 grams of protein per day grows by tens of millions per year.
Risk Rating: ranges from 6 to 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO and UNP, and also own shares of AMZN, HRL, MO, MKC, BRK-B, CAT and WMT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
The idea that you can find a safe haven for your savings, one which will allow you to ride out a crash in the US stock market, is a pleasant fiction. Articles in support of that idea are published almost daily. But unless you are a trader who can afford to rent or buy a $500,000 seat on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, you probably aren’t deft enough to arbitrage the various risks accurately enough before they develop (and at low enough transaction costs) to avoid losing money in a crash.
If you really want to ride out most crashes, invest in a bond-heavy balanced mutual fund that is managed by real humans. The Vanguard Group offers one best, and it comes with very low transaction fees (Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund or VWINX). To refresh yourself on the competitive advantages of investing in food and agriculture companies, see our most recent blog on the subject (see Month 91). To refresh yourself on the competitive disadvantages, study this month’s Table and Bottom Line carefully.
The essential fact is that economies require money for spending and investment. That comes down to having consumers who are confident enough about their employment prospects and entrepreneurs who are confident enough about their ability to invest. Those consumers and entrepreneurs can be relied upon to transfer their successes to the larger economy by saving money, taking out loans, and paying taxes. National economies are interlinked. Because of the size and innovation of its marketplace, the US economy is the main enabler for most of the other national economies. Logic would suggest that the valuation for any asset class will roughly track the ups and downs of the S&P 500 Index, either as a first derivative or second derivative.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze US and Canadian food and agriculture companies that carry at least a BBB rating on their bonds (see Column R).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Of the 25 companies listed in the Table, only one meets Warren Buffett’s criteria of low beta (see Column I), low volatility (Column M), high quality (Column S), strong balance sheet (Columns N-R), and TTM (Trailing Twelve Month) earnings plus mrq (most recent quarter) Book Values that yield a Graham Number which is not far from the stock’s current Price (Column Y). That company is Berkshire Hathaway. We use a Basic Quality Screen that is less stringent as his: 1) an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better (Column S), 2) an S&P bond rating of BBB+ or better (Column R), 3) 16-Yr price volatility (Column M) that is less than 3 times the rate of price appreciation (Column K), and 4) a positive dollar amount for net present value (Column W) when using a 10-Yr holding period in combination with a 10% discount rate (to reflect a 10% Required Rate of Return).
Bottom Line: Only 8 companies on the list pass our Basic Quality Screen (see Administration above): HRL, COST, PEP, KO, DE, FAST, CNI, UNP. At the opposite end of the spectrum, 9 companies have a below-market S&P bond rating of BBB. So, those stocks represent outright gambles.
Aside from Berkshire Hathaway, none of the 25 companies can be said to issue a reasonably priced “value” stock. We’re dealing with 24 “growth” stocks, only a third of which are of high quality. Three of the 9 with BBB bond ratings have high total debt levels relative to EBITDA (see Column O in the Table) that are unprotected by Tangible Book Value (Column P): SJM, MKC, GIS. The good news is that only one of the 9 appears to be overpriced, and that company (MKC) is a quasi-monopoly that has little risk of bankruptcy because it has “cornered” the US spice market.
In summary, you can do well by investing in this space as long as you understand that you’re dealing with a fragmented food industry, one that is flush with companies of dubious quality. You might like to be well-informed about these companies because food, like fuel, is an essential good, and the food industry enjoys steady growth. Why? Because the number of people in Asia & Africa who can afford to consume 50 grams of protein per day grows by tens of millions per year.
Risk Rating: ranges from 6 to 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO and UNP, and also own shares of AMZN, HRL, MO, MKC, BRK-B, CAT and WMT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, March 31
Month 93 - Members of "The 2 and 8 Club" in the S&P 500 Index - Winter 2019 Update
Situation: Some investors are experienced enough to try beating the market, but few tools are available to help them. Business schools professors like to point out that it is a settled issue, with only two routes are available: A stock-picker can either seek information from a company insider (which is illegal) or assume more risk (buy high-beta stocks). The latter route can provide higher returns but those will eventually be eroded by the higher volatility in stock prices. In other words, risk-adjusted returns (at their best) will not beat an S&P 500 Index fund (e.g. VFINX) or ETF (e.g. SPY).
Mission: Develop an algorithm for investing in high-beta stocks. Use our Standard Spreadsheet for companies likely to have higher quality.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: We call the resulting algorithm “The 2 and 8 Club” because it focuses on companies that a) pay an above-market dividend and b) have grown that dividend at least 8%/yr over the most recent 5 year period. Quality criteria require that a company’s bonds carry an S&P rating of BBB+ or better, and that its common stock carry an S&P rating of B+/M or better. We also require 16 or more years of trading records on a public exchange, so that weekly prices can be analyzed by the “BMW Method”. We use the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) as our benchmark, given that it rarely has a dividend yield lower than 2% or a dividend growth rate lower than 8%. And, we use the US companies listed in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) High Dividend Yield Index as our only source for stocks paying an above-market dividend. That index is based on the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. The Vanguard Group markets both a mutual fund (VHDYX) and an ETF (VYM) for the ~400 companies in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The same companies are found on each list, and weighted by market capitalization and updated monthly.
Bottom Line: As expected, this algorithm beats the S&P 500 Index (see Columns C, F, K & W) at the expense of greater risk (see Columns D, I, J & M). Its utility lies in risk mitigation (see Columns R & S), where the cutoffs for S&P rankings make these companies above-average for the S&P 500 Index with respect to the risk of bankruptcy. Only 23 companies in the S&P 500 Index qualify for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and only 5 of those are in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (JPM, TRV, CSCO, MMM, IBM). An additional 5 companies are found in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index but have insufficient market capitalization to be included in the S&P 500 Index (WSO, HUBB, SWX, EV, R; see COMPARISONS section in the Table).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into JPM and NEE, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, BLK, IBM, R and CMI.
Caveat Emptor: This week’s blog is addressed to investors who a) have been investing in common stocks for more than 20 years, b) don’t use margin loans, and c) have more than $200,000 available for making such investments. Most investors are best served by maintaining a 50-50 balance between stocks and bonds, e.g. by investing in the total US stock and bond markets (VTI and BND at Lines 30 & 38 in the Table). That 50-50 investment has returned ~8%/yr over the past 10 years and ~5%/yr over the past 5 years. The same result can be found by investing in a balanced mutual fund where stocks and bonds are picked for you: The Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX at Line 35 in the Table). Either way, you’re likely to have no more than 2 down years per decade: VWINX has had only 7 down years since 1970. NOTE: all of the stocks in VWINX are picked from the same FTSE High Dividend Yield Index that we use for “The 2 and Club”.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Develop an algorithm for investing in high-beta stocks. Use our Standard Spreadsheet for companies likely to have higher quality.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: We call the resulting algorithm “The 2 and 8 Club” because it focuses on companies that a) pay an above-market dividend and b) have grown that dividend at least 8%/yr over the most recent 5 year period. Quality criteria require that a company’s bonds carry an S&P rating of BBB+ or better, and that its common stock carry an S&P rating of B+/M or better. We also require 16 or more years of trading records on a public exchange, so that weekly prices can be analyzed by the “BMW Method”. We use the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) as our benchmark, given that it rarely has a dividend yield lower than 2% or a dividend growth rate lower than 8%. And, we use the US companies listed in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) High Dividend Yield Index as our only source for stocks paying an above-market dividend. That index is based on the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. The Vanguard Group markets both a mutual fund (VHDYX) and an ETF (VYM) for the ~400 companies in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The same companies are found on each list, and weighted by market capitalization and updated monthly.
Bottom Line: As expected, this algorithm beats the S&P 500 Index (see Columns C, F, K & W) at the expense of greater risk (see Columns D, I, J & M). Its utility lies in risk mitigation (see Columns R & S), where the cutoffs for S&P rankings make these companies above-average for the S&P 500 Index with respect to the risk of bankruptcy. Only 23 companies in the S&P 500 Index qualify for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and only 5 of those are in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (JPM, TRV, CSCO, MMM, IBM). An additional 5 companies are found in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index but have insufficient market capitalization to be included in the S&P 500 Index (WSO, HUBB, SWX, EV, R; see COMPARISONS section in the Table).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into JPM and NEE, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, BLK, IBM, R and CMI.
Caveat Emptor: This week’s blog is addressed to investors who a) have been investing in common stocks for more than 20 years, b) don’t use margin loans, and c) have more than $200,000 available for making such investments. Most investors are best served by maintaining a 50-50 balance between stocks and bonds, e.g. by investing in the total US stock and bond markets (VTI and BND at Lines 30 & 38 in the Table). That 50-50 investment has returned ~8%/yr over the past 10 years and ~5%/yr over the past 5 years. The same result can be found by investing in a balanced mutual fund where stocks and bonds are picked for you: The Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX at Line 35 in the Table). Either way, you’re likely to have no more than 2 down years per decade: VWINX has had only 7 down years since 1970. NOTE: all of the stocks in VWINX are picked from the same FTSE High Dividend Yield Index that we use for “The 2 and Club”.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, January 27
Month 91 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Winter 2019 Update
Situation: We all have to eat, so food is an essential good. Even in a commodity bear market, the valuations of food and agriculture companies will likely hold up better than the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY - see Column D in this month’s Table). Which is amazing, given that grains and livestock account for 29% of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Another way of saying this is that the volumes of food sold are inelastic, much like gasoline. This gives investments in food and agriculture companies a special, almost unique, competitive advantage.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, December 16
Week 389 - Bond ETFs
Situation: You want to balance your stock portfolio with safe bonds. Right? Well, here’s a news flash: You need to start thinking about balancing your bond portfolio with safe stocks. Why? Because the world is gorging itself on debt--households, municipalities, states, nations, and corporations most of all. Yes, this is understandable because the Great Recession was so disabling that central banks everywhere dropped interest rates lower than the rate of inflation. It was free money, so people borrowed the stuff and invested it. Just as the central bankers had intended. Economic activity gradually returned to normal almost everywhere, now that 10 years have passed since Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. But the Federal Open Market Committee is removing the punch bowl from the party and raising short-term interest rates by a quarter percent 3-4 times a year. Bondholders are stocking up on Advil due to interest rate risk (duration), meaning that for each 1% rise in short-term interest rates there is a material reduction in the value of an existing bond that is worse for long-term than short-term bonds.
If a company is struggling and has to refinance a maturing issue of long-term debt, it will have to pay a materially higher rate of interest vs. that paid to holders of the expiring bond. This may impact the credit rating of its existing bonds, driving it closer to insolvency. General Electric (GE) is an especially vivid example of how this works. A few short years ago, GE had an S&P rating of AAA for its bonds. That rating is now BBB+ and falling fast. Larry Culp, the CEO, is desperately selling off core divisions of the company in an attempt to avert bankruptcy.
Mission: Use appropriate columns of our Standard Spreadsheet to evaluate the leading bond ETFs, and compare those to the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY) as well as a stock with an S&P Bond Rating of AA or better.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: To offset the risks in your stock portfolio (bankruptcy, market crashes and sensitivity to fluctuation of interest rates), you need a bond portfolio. Why? Because high quality bonds rise in value during stock market crashes and/or recessions, have much less credit risk, and usually less interest rate risk. Stock prices are more sensitive to short-term interest rates than any but the longest-dated bonds, e.g. 30-Yr US Treasury Bonds. Stock indexes like the S&P 500 Index (SPY) have average S&P Bond Ratings of BBB to BBB+, compared to AA+ for 30-Yr Treasuries. To cover those risks, you’ll need a bond fund that has low-medium interest rate risk and high credit quality. BND and IEF are examples (see Table). BIV differs only in having medium credit quality per Morningstar. TLT has high credit quality but also has high interest rate sensitivity. TLT can be compared to a stock with high credit quality and high interest rate sensitivity, e.g. Pfizer (PFE; see Table). The main thing to remember is that stock market crashes are invariably accompanied by a booming bond market (flight to safety). That’s a good thing because governments will have to take on a lot more debt to finance social programs like unemployment insurance.
Risk Rating: 1 for BND and IEF (where 10-Yr Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I own bond funds that approximate BIV and TLT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
If a company is struggling and has to refinance a maturing issue of long-term debt, it will have to pay a materially higher rate of interest vs. that paid to holders of the expiring bond. This may impact the credit rating of its existing bonds, driving it closer to insolvency. General Electric (GE) is an especially vivid example of how this works. A few short years ago, GE had an S&P rating of AAA for its bonds. That rating is now BBB+ and falling fast. Larry Culp, the CEO, is desperately selling off core divisions of the company in an attempt to avert bankruptcy.
Mission: Use appropriate columns of our Standard Spreadsheet to evaluate the leading bond ETFs, and compare those to the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY) as well as a stock with an S&P Bond Rating of AA or better.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: To offset the risks in your stock portfolio (bankruptcy, market crashes and sensitivity to fluctuation of interest rates), you need a bond portfolio. Why? Because high quality bonds rise in value during stock market crashes and/or recessions, have much less credit risk, and usually less interest rate risk. Stock prices are more sensitive to short-term interest rates than any but the longest-dated bonds, e.g. 30-Yr US Treasury Bonds. Stock indexes like the S&P 500 Index (SPY) have average S&P Bond Ratings of BBB to BBB+, compared to AA+ for 30-Yr Treasuries. To cover those risks, you’ll need a bond fund that has low-medium interest rate risk and high credit quality. BND and IEF are examples (see Table). BIV differs only in having medium credit quality per Morningstar. TLT has high credit quality but also has high interest rate sensitivity. TLT can be compared to a stock with high credit quality and high interest rate sensitivity, e.g. Pfizer (PFE; see Table). The main thing to remember is that stock market crashes are invariably accompanied by a booming bond market (flight to safety). That’s a good thing because governments will have to take on a lot more debt to finance social programs like unemployment insurance.
Risk Rating: 1 for BND and IEF (where 10-Yr Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I own bond funds that approximate BIV and TLT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, November 18
Week 385 - Let’s Dollar-Average Into 10 Stocks From The Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index
Situation: The advantage of dollar-cost averaging into specific stocks vs. dollar-averaging into the reference index is that you can focus on high-quality companies. However, those companies are less dynamic than early-movers. By investing in an index fund you’ll capture the effect that “earnings surprises” have on prices for early-movers. So, let’s compare a portfolio of 10 high quality stocks to the relevant index. Dollar-averaging identical amounts each month into either the index or each of the 10 stocks is just a way to buy more shares whenever the market is down. That way, I can assume that your returns will approximate the published total returns/Yr.
Mission: Pick 10 stocks from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index. Then run our Standard Spreadsheet.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 10 stocks I’ve picked happen to be the 10 that I dollar-average into.
Bottom Line: From the spreadsheet, I cannot discern a material difference in long-term returns from dollar-averaging in an index fund, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM), compared to dollar-averaging into the 10 stocks I’ve picked. However, there is a material difference with respect to transaction costs: VYM has an expense ratio of 0.08%, whereas, the expense ratio for dollar-averaging into my 10 stocks is ~1.2%.
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Pick 10 stocks from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index. Then run our Standard Spreadsheet.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 10 stocks I’ve picked happen to be the 10 that I dollar-average into.
Bottom Line: From the spreadsheet, I cannot discern a material difference in long-term returns from dollar-averaging in an index fund, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM), compared to dollar-averaging into the 10 stocks I’ve picked. However, there is a material difference with respect to transaction costs: VYM has an expense ratio of 0.08%, whereas, the expense ratio for dollar-averaging into my 10 stocks is ~1.2%.
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 21
Week 381 - Dividend-paying Production Agriculture Companies
Situation: Now we come to feeding the planet. Yes, row crops are a commodity so spot prices can go to extremes and stay there awhile. And yes, agricultural equipment makers can only sell product if farmers have money to spend. On the other hand, there have been improvements in satellite-based technology, 3rd party logistics, and financial services that dial back much of the risk introduced by weather. However, markets and prices have become sufficiently reliable that major countries no longer back up food supplies with large reserves. Similarly, investors are left to cope with consolidation brought on by global sourcing and improvements in planting and harvesting technologies. The supply chains for insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizer have been disrupted to such a degree that companies have had to enter into wave after wave of cross-border merger & acquisition activity. To their credit, Dow Chemical and DuPont are US leaders in the Ag Chemical space who have merged without bringing in companies from other countries. Even DowDuPont will have to split into 3 companies in order to devote one enterprise to Ag Chemicals and Seed Development: Corteva Agriscience.
Mission: Highlight the leading companies that support farm production by using our Standard Spreadsheet. Include beef, pork, and poultry processors that have a controlling interest in animal breeding and egg production facilities. Include IBM because it has a monopoly on weather satellites and owns The Weather Channel.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: This is a dicey area for investors, even those who make a study of it. The good news is that the common stocks in all 10 companies remain reasonably priced (see Columns Y-AA), which is saying a lot.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into IBM and CAT, and own shares of HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Highlight the leading companies that support farm production by using our Standard Spreadsheet. Include beef, pork, and poultry processors that have a controlling interest in animal breeding and egg production facilities. Include IBM because it has a monopoly on weather satellites and owns The Weather Channel.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: This is a dicey area for investors, even those who make a study of it. The good news is that the common stocks in all 10 companies remain reasonably priced (see Columns Y-AA), which is saying a lot.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into IBM and CAT, and own shares of HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 14
Week 380 - Are Stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” Overpriced?
Situation: There’s a lot of talk suggesting that an “overpriced” stock market is headed for a fall. And sure, stocks do have rich valuations because the Federal Reserve has kept money cheap for 10 years and bonds don’t pay enough interest to compete for investor’s money (because the Federal Reserve bought up long-dated bonds). Now the Federal Reserve is determined to reverse those policies and investors are having to get used to the idea that stocks will revert to true value. But we have to specify which metrics define “overpriced” and use at least two of those before concluding that a particular stock is overpriced (see our blogs for the past two weeks).
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet, using colors in Columns Y and Z to highlight Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es that are overpriced (purple) or underpriced (green).
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, the 32 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” have Graham Numbers that are more than 200% of their current valuation. This leaves room for at least a 50% fall from present prices. However, our confirmation metric does not support such a dire prediction: The average 7-Yr P/E is a little under the upper limit of the normal range for valuations (25).
Stocks issued by some companies appear to clearly be overpriced, in that the Graham Number is more than twice the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is more than 30: TXN, ADP, UPS, HSY and CAT. Other companies appear to clearly be underpriced in that the Graham Number is less than the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is less than 25: CMCSA, PNC, ADM, PFG and MET. The fact that 5/32 stocks are overpriced and 5/32 stocks are underpriced is indicative of normal distribution (Bell Curve). So, we’ll use this approach often in future blogs.
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet, using colors in Columns Y and Z to highlight Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es that are overpriced (purple) or underpriced (green).
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, the 32 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” have Graham Numbers that are more than 200% of their current valuation. This leaves room for at least a 50% fall from present prices. However, our confirmation metric does not support such a dire prediction: The average 7-Yr P/E is a little under the upper limit of the normal range for valuations (25).
Stocks issued by some companies appear to clearly be overpriced, in that the Graham Number is more than twice the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is more than 30: TXN, ADP, UPS, HSY and CAT. Other companies appear to clearly be underpriced in that the Graham Number is less than the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is less than 25: CMCSA, PNC, ADM, PFG and MET. The fact that 5/32 stocks are overpriced and 5/32 stocks are underpriced is indicative of normal distribution (Bell Curve). So, we’ll use this approach often in future blogs.
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 7
Week 379 - Are “Blue Chip” Stocks Overvalued?
Situation: There are two subjective issues that we need to quantify for “buy and hold” investors: 1) Define a “blue chip” stock. 2) Define an “overvalued” stock.
Our previous effort to define a “blue chip” stock in quantitative terms (see Week 361) left room for subjective interpretation and was more complicated than necessary. Here’s the new and improved definition: Any US-based company in the S&P 100 Index whose stock has been tracked by modern quantitative methods for 30+ years, and enjoys an S&P rating of B+/M or better. The very important final requirement is that the company issues bonds carrying an S&P rating of A- or better.
In last week’s blog, we introduced two different quantitative methods for deciding whether or not a stock is overvalued: 1) the Graham Number, which sets an optimal price by using Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) and Earnings Per Share for the trailing 12 months (TTM); 2) the 7-Yr P/E, which removes aberrations that are introduced by “blowout earnings” or the negative impact on earnings that is often introduced by “mergers and acquisitions” and “company restructurings.” Either metric can be misleading if used alone, but that problem is largely negated when both are used together.
Mission: Set up our Standard Spreadsheet for the 40 companies that meet criteria. Show the Graham Number in Columns X and the 7-Yr P/E in Column Z.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: In our original blog about Blue Chip stocks (Week 361), we thought the definition needed to require that companies pay a good and growing dividend. However, there are no objective reasons why a company’s stock will be of more value if profits are paid out piecemeal to investors rather than entirely in the form of capital gains. That’s one of the things you learn in business school from professors of Banking and Finance. Accounting professors also point out that a dividend is a mini-liquidation, as well as a second round of taxation on the company’s profits. There are subjective reasons to prefer companies that pay a good and growing dividend, like building brand value (an intangible asset) and showing that the company is “shareholder friendly.” Dividends also reduce risk by returning some of the original investment quickly with inflation-protected dollars.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, these company’s shares are overpriced but not to an unreasonable degree (see Columns X-Z in the Table). However, only 8 are bargain-priced: Altria Group (MO), Comcast (CMCSA), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Bank of New York Mellon (BK), Wells Fargo (WFB), US Bancorp (USB), and Exxon Mobil (XOM). You’ll note that all 8 face challenges that will cause investors to pause before snapping up shares.
Shares in 9 companies are overpriced by both metrics (Graham Number and 7-Yr P/E): Home Depot (HD), UnitedHealth (UNH), Lowe’s (LOW), Costco Wholesale (COST), Microsoft (MSFT), Texas Instruments (TXN), Raytheon (RTN), Honeywell International (HON), and Caterpillar (CAT). You’ll need to think about taking profits in those, if you’re a share-owner.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, KO, JNJ, JPM, UNP, PG, WMT, CAT, XOM, and IBM. I also own shares of COST, MMM, BRK-B, and INTC.
Our previous effort to define a “blue chip” stock in quantitative terms (see Week 361) left room for subjective interpretation and was more complicated than necessary. Here’s the new and improved definition: Any US-based company in the S&P 100 Index whose stock has been tracked by modern quantitative methods for 30+ years, and enjoys an S&P rating of B+/M or better. The very important final requirement is that the company issues bonds carrying an S&P rating of A- or better.
In last week’s blog, we introduced two different quantitative methods for deciding whether or not a stock is overvalued: 1) the Graham Number, which sets an optimal price by using Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) and Earnings Per Share for the trailing 12 months (TTM); 2) the 7-Yr P/E, which removes aberrations that are introduced by “blowout earnings” or the negative impact on earnings that is often introduced by “mergers and acquisitions” and “company restructurings.” Either metric can be misleading if used alone, but that problem is largely negated when both are used together.
Mission: Set up our Standard Spreadsheet for the 40 companies that meet criteria. Show the Graham Number in Columns X and the 7-Yr P/E in Column Z.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: In our original blog about Blue Chip stocks (Week 361), we thought the definition needed to require that companies pay a good and growing dividend. However, there are no objective reasons why a company’s stock will be of more value if profits are paid out piecemeal to investors rather than entirely in the form of capital gains. That’s one of the things you learn in business school from professors of Banking and Finance. Accounting professors also point out that a dividend is a mini-liquidation, as well as a second round of taxation on the company’s profits. There are subjective reasons to prefer companies that pay a good and growing dividend, like building brand value (an intangible asset) and showing that the company is “shareholder friendly.” Dividends also reduce risk by returning some of the original investment quickly with inflation-protected dollars.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, these company’s shares are overpriced but not to an unreasonable degree (see Columns X-Z in the Table). However, only 8 are bargain-priced: Altria Group (MO), Comcast (CMCSA), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Bank of New York Mellon (BK), Wells Fargo (WFB), US Bancorp (USB), and Exxon Mobil (XOM). You’ll note that all 8 face challenges that will cause investors to pause before snapping up shares.
Shares in 9 companies are overpriced by both metrics (Graham Number and 7-Yr P/E): Home Depot (HD), UnitedHealth (UNH), Lowe’s (LOW), Costco Wholesale (COST), Microsoft (MSFT), Texas Instruments (TXN), Raytheon (RTN), Honeywell International (HON), and Caterpillar (CAT). You’ll need to think about taking profits in those, if you’re a share-owner.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, KO, JNJ, JPM, UNP, PG, WMT, CAT, XOM, and IBM. I also own shares of COST, MMM, BRK-B, and INTC.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, September 16
Week 376 - What Does A Simple IRA Look Like?
Situation: You’re bombarded with advice about how to save for retirement. But unless you’re already rich, the details are simple. Dollar-cost average 60% of your contribution into a stock index fund and 40% into a short or intermediate-term bond index fund. If you know you’ll never be in “the upper middle class”, opt for the short-term bond index fund. But maybe you have a workplace retirement plan, which makes saving for retirement a little more complicated. Either way, you’ll want to contribute the maximum amount each year to your IRA, which is currently $5500/yr until you reach age 50; then it’s $6500/yr.
Here’s our KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) suggestion: Make your IRA payments with Vanguard Group by using a Simple IRA (Vanguard terminology) composed only of the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF or VYM. Then, contribute 2/3rds of that amount into Inflation-protected US Savings Bonds. These are called ISBs and work just like an IRA. No tax is due from ISBs until you spend the money but there’s a penalty for spending the money early (you’ll lose one interest payment if you cash out before 5 years). The annual contribution limit is $10,000/yr. A convenient proxy for ISBs, with similar total returns, is the Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index ETF or BSV.
Mission: Create a Table showing a 60% allocation to VYM and 40% allocation to BSV. Include appropriate benchmarks, to allow the reader to create her own variation on that theme.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: However you juggle the numbers, it looks like you’ll make ~7%/yr overall through your IRA + ISB retirement plan, with no taxes due until you spend the money. In other words, each year’s contribution will double in value every 10 years. The beauty of this plan is that transaction costs are almost zero, and the chance that it will give you headaches is almost zero.
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into Inflation-protected Savings Bonds and the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Here’s our KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) suggestion: Make your IRA payments with Vanguard Group by using a Simple IRA (Vanguard terminology) composed only of the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF or VYM. Then, contribute 2/3rds of that amount into Inflation-protected US Savings Bonds. These are called ISBs and work just like an IRA. No tax is due from ISBs until you spend the money but there’s a penalty for spending the money early (you’ll lose one interest payment if you cash out before 5 years). The annual contribution limit is $10,000/yr. A convenient proxy for ISBs, with similar total returns, is the Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index ETF or BSV.
Mission: Create a Table showing a 60% allocation to VYM and 40% allocation to BSV. Include appropriate benchmarks, to allow the reader to create her own variation on that theme.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: However you juggle the numbers, it looks like you’ll make ~7%/yr overall through your IRA + ISB retirement plan, with no taxes due until you spend the money. In other words, each year’s contribution will double in value every 10 years. The beauty of this plan is that transaction costs are almost zero, and the chance that it will give you headaches is almost zero.
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into Inflation-protected Savings Bonds and the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)