Situation: There are 11 pharmaceutical companies in the S&P 100 Index, with an average market capitalization of ~$130 Billion. Stocks issued by healthcare companies (including hospital chains, pharmacy benefit managers, medical insurance vendors, and drugstores) are thought to be defensive “risk-off” bets, like stocks issued by utility, communication services, or consumer staples companies. But they’re not. Healthcare consumes almost 20% of GDP but it is a highly fragmented industry, rife with government interference seeking full control. Medical innovation for the entire planet has to take place in the United States because the healthcare industry is socialized elsewhere and large amounts of private capital are needed to conduct clinical trials. That innovation makes US healthcare into an ongoing research enterprise. For biotechnology companies, there is an ever-present risk of being eclipsed by another company’s research team. Stockpickers who have some appreciation for biochemistry can perhaps identify biotechnology groups that are onto a good thing. But Big Pharma companies survive by looking to buy those same startups. Can you really scope-out a “good thing” better than their scientists?
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 11 pharmaceutical companies in the S&P 100 Index.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: This is not a game for the retail investor. All she can do is buy stock in one or two of the 11 “Big Pharma” companies, and hope that its CEO can find small biotechnology groups conducting breakthrough science, then buy at least one a year to throw money at. That’s an iffy business. Why? Because large-scale clinical studies (costing hundreds of million dollars) have to be conducted before the bet pays off. Usually it doesn’t. If you’re a stock-picker new to this industry, start by researching the old standbys that reliably pay good dividends: Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Merck (MRK), Pfizer (PFE) and Eli Lilly (LLY).
Risk Rating: 7 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into JNJ and also own shares of ABT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Showing posts with label life insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label life insurance. Show all posts
Sunday, June 17
Sunday, December 25
Week 286 - Should You Take Out A Reverse Mortgage?
Situation: Young couples are often advised to make payments each month on 1) a home mortgage, and 2) a “whole life” insurance policy. Homes are not good investments, and neither are “whole life” policies. They’re a form of compelled savings. If we later find ourselves unprepared for retirement, we may be guided to recoup those savings by “taking out” a reverse mortgage or “borrowing against” a whole life policy. The government joins the party by compelling us to save during our working years (under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act of 1935), and then guides us to recoup our “Social Security” savings in retirement.
Mission: Look at the costs and benefits of reverse mortgages. NOTE: To obtain more detailed information, I suggest reading this article that appeared in USA Today on October 28.
Execution: “On the plus side, reverse mortgages are considered loan advances to you, not income you earned. Thus, the payments you receive are not taxable. Moreover, they usually don't affect your Social Security or Medicare benefits.” Emotional benefits play a role, given that 1) you get to keep living in your home without paying rent, and 2) your children get to inherit a house that retains considerable equity. And, reverse mortgages make a great Rainy Day Fund.
On the negative side, there is “opportunity cost”: You are giving up the opportunity to invest a large sum of your own money, if you sell the house and rent a place more suited to your needs. Transaction costs on the sale are the same as those for taking out a reverse mortgage (6%), which leaves 94% for you to invest. We provide an example (see Table) of how you might set up an online investment in bonds and stocks that pays out at least 2%/yr (after transaction costs) and grows those payments at least 2%/yr.
Administration: The investment example has an asset allocation of 50% bonds/50% stocks. The bonds are “zero risk/zero cost” 10-Yr Treasury Notes accessed through the government website; that site also offers inflation-protected Treasury Notes. You can invest in KO, JNJ and WMT online but have to use a different website to invest in PG. Each pays a good and growing dividend, and had Total Returns/yr during the Housing Crisis that were better than those for our key benchmark, the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBINX; see Column D in the Table).
It is best to make these investments over time, starting with 40% of your proceeds then adding $100/mo to each of the 4 stocks and $1200/qtr to T-Notes. So, 60% of the proceeds from selling your house would initially go to an FDIC-insured savings account paying little interest. Part of that 60% will never be invested because it serves as your Rainy Day Fund. Nonetheless, you’ll be in a position to withdraw $9600/yr for electronic transfers to bond and stock accounts. Annual transaction costs come to ~$72/yr (see Column N in the Table).
Bottom Line: Reverse mortgages can be a good idea, if you’ve paid off your home mortgage and have almost no source of retirement income outside of Social Security. But inflation will always be with us, so it might be better to sell your house and move to a place that is not designed for raising children. Then, you can invest the proceeds from selling your house in a manner that costs you little and provides an opportunity to protect yourself from inflation.
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into PG and JNJ, as well as inflation-protected Savings Bonds (which are an IRA-like version of 10-Yr Treasury Notes). I also own shares of KO and WMT.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Look at the costs and benefits of reverse mortgages. NOTE: To obtain more detailed information, I suggest reading this article that appeared in USA Today on October 28.
Execution: “On the plus side, reverse mortgages are considered loan advances to you, not income you earned. Thus, the payments you receive are not taxable. Moreover, they usually don't affect your Social Security or Medicare benefits.” Emotional benefits play a role, given that 1) you get to keep living in your home without paying rent, and 2) your children get to inherit a house that retains considerable equity. And, reverse mortgages make a great Rainy Day Fund.
On the negative side, there is “opportunity cost”: You are giving up the opportunity to invest a large sum of your own money, if you sell the house and rent a place more suited to your needs. Transaction costs on the sale are the same as those for taking out a reverse mortgage (6%), which leaves 94% for you to invest. We provide an example (see Table) of how you might set up an online investment in bonds and stocks that pays out at least 2%/yr (after transaction costs) and grows those payments at least 2%/yr.
Administration: The investment example has an asset allocation of 50% bonds/50% stocks. The bonds are “zero risk/zero cost” 10-Yr Treasury Notes accessed through the government website; that site also offers inflation-protected Treasury Notes. You can invest in KO, JNJ and WMT online but have to use a different website to invest in PG. Each pays a good and growing dividend, and had Total Returns/yr during the Housing Crisis that were better than those for our key benchmark, the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBINX; see Column D in the Table).
It is best to make these investments over time, starting with 40% of your proceeds then adding $100/mo to each of the 4 stocks and $1200/qtr to T-Notes. So, 60% of the proceeds from selling your house would initially go to an FDIC-insured savings account paying little interest. Part of that 60% will never be invested because it serves as your Rainy Day Fund. Nonetheless, you’ll be in a position to withdraw $9600/yr for electronic transfers to bond and stock accounts. Annual transaction costs come to ~$72/yr (see Column N in the Table).
Bottom Line: Reverse mortgages can be a good idea, if you’ve paid off your home mortgage and have almost no source of retirement income outside of Social Security. But inflation will always be with us, so it might be better to sell your house and move to a place that is not designed for raising children. Then, you can invest the proceeds from selling your house in a manner that costs you little and provides an opportunity to protect yourself from inflation.
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into PG and JNJ, as well as inflation-protected Savings Bonds (which are an IRA-like version of 10-Yr Treasury Notes). I also own shares of KO and WMT.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)