Situation: If you’re a stock picker, you’ll need Buy-and-Hold stocks that are suitable for retirement but you’ll also need to know how to “buy low.” The job of an investor, according to Joel Greenblatt (CEO of Gotham Capital), “is to figure out what a business is worth and pay a lot less”. Those two words (buy low) separate investors from savers.
The objective way to “buy low” is to listen to Warren Buffett and dollar-cost average a fixed amount each month into shares of large, well managed, and long-established companies with clean Balance Sheets. You do this by using an online Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP). When the price of that stock falls during a Bear Market, you’ll automatically BUY LOW and acquire more shares per month than usual.
The subjective way to “buy low” is to resort to labor-intensive Fundamental Analysis, which uses a bespoke set of metrics to repeatedly examine stocks in each sub-industry and decide which are bargain-priced. My requirements for a company to be “A-rated” and join my Watch List of “large and well-managed companies with clean Balance Sheets” can be seen in the Tables for each month’s blog. For example, a large company is one in the S&P 100 Index. A well-managed company is one picked by the Managing Editor of The Wall Street Journal for inclusion in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Index. A clean Balance Sheet is one earning an S&P Bond Rating of A- (or better), with positive Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq). I also require that Tangible Book Value (TBV) be a positive number but a negative TBV is acceptable if the company is mainly capitalized by Common Stock and its Total Debt is no greater than 2.5X EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization) for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM). The companies I analyze are listed in both the iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VYM). I interpret “long-established” to mean a 20+ year history of being traded on a public stock exchange.
Mission: Using our Standard Spreadsheet, analyze A-rated stocks that are in both the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average and the S&P 100 Index.
Execution: see Table. Columns AP and AQ give annual costs and the vendor URL for each dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP).
Administration: The idea behind owning “value” stocks is to lose less during Bear Markets. The idea behind owning “growth” stocks is to earn more during Bull Markets. Column AO shows how much the price of each stock changed in 2008. Column D shows how much the price of each stock changed in 2018 (when the S&P 500 Index lost 19.9% in the 4th quarter). These 14 stocks lost 5% less than the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) in 2018, and 17.3% less in 2008. An additional benefit of owning shares in these “value” companies that pay above-market dividends is that 7 are also listed in the iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY): MRK, KO, PG, JNJ, CAT, MMM, IBM. You can have “the best of both worlds” by owning those.
Bottom Line: The secret of stock picking is to have a short Watch List because you’ll need to practice due diligence: follow the evolution of each company’s “story” and the effectiveness of its managers. This takes time and money: online subscriptions to The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Bloomberg Businessweek, and The New York Times don’t come cheap. Neither do online DRIPs: For example, the average expense ratio in the first year of using a DRIP to buy into these 14 companies is 1.56% (see Column AP in the Table: $18.76/$1200 = 1.56%). And, you’ll get a bigger bill from your accountant if you decide to sell a DRIP, besides spending more time yourself to get the paperwork ready. For example, you’ll have to list the “cost basis” for each of the 16 purchases you made each year (12 monthly purchases plus 4 purchases to reinvest quarterly dividends) of each stock so your accountant can calculate capital gains.
Risk Rating: 6 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into PFE, NEE, INTC, KO, PG, WMT, JPM, JNJ, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of MRK, DUK, SO and MMM.
NOTE: Aside from dollar-cost averaging, there is second objective way to buy low: make “one-off” purchases of any of these 14 stocks that appear on the “Dogs of the Dow” list, which is updated every New Year’s Day. For example, the 10 dogs on this year’s list include: International Business Machines (IBM), Pfizer (PFE), 3M (MMM), and Coca-Cola (KO).
The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Showing posts with label balance sheets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label balance sheets. Show all posts
Sunday, June 28
Sunday, May 26
Month 95 - Dow Jones Industrial Average - Spring 2019 Update
Situation: The S&P 500 Index has recently posted a new all-time high, and “The Dow” is only 1% away from a new all-time high. However, Dow Theory won’t label that achievement (if it happens) as the beginning of a new Primary Uptrend. Why? Because the Dow Jones Transportation Average still has to go somewhat higher before it “corroborates The Dow.” Conclusion: Dow Theory still places the US stock market in a Short-term Downtrend. If you’re a stock-picker, that means you still need to consider selling the overpriced stocks in your portfolio. Why? Because things are likely to get worse before they get better.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight DJIA stocks that appear to be overpriced.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: It is almost impossible to distinguish an overpriced stock from a stock that is pulling in more investors because they see a bright future. If the company is already highly regarded because of its Balance Sheet, Product Lines, and Brand Penetration, I would hesitate to call its stock overpriced at any P/E (think of Amazon with its P/E of 81).
I’m a numbers guy, so I use two numbers to decide if a stock is overpriced (where “price” or P is defined as the 50-day moving average):
1) the 7-yr P/E is greater than 30.
2) the stock’s Graham Number, which is the square root of 22.5 times Earnings Per Share multiplied by Book Value Per Share, is more than 250% of its price.
If only one of those two numbers is over the limit, the stock is still overpriced if the other number is close to the limit, i.e., more than 25 or 200%, respectively. (For Amazon, those numbers are 53 and 752%. So, it’s overpriced and I sold my shares.)
Deciding whether or not to buy a stock is also tricky. To give a more nuanced estimate of a stock’s value to the investor, I’ve devised a Basic Quality Screen that has only 6 elements and a maximum score of 4 (see Table):
1) If price appreciation over the past 16 yrs has been greater than 1/3rd the risk of short-term loss as determined by the BMW Method, one point is added. In other words, price appreciation in Column K is greater than 1/3rd the risk in Column M.
2) If Tangible Book Value in Column S is negative and LT-debt represents more than 50% of Total Capital (Column O), or Total Debt is more than 250% of EBITDA (Column P), one point is subtracted.
3) If the S&P Bond Rating in Column U is BBB+ or better, one point is added.
4) If the S&P Stock Rating in Column V is B+/M or better, one point is added.
5) If Net Present Value of accumulated dividends and cash-out after a 10 year Holding Period is a positive number, when applying a Discount Rate of 10% (see Column Z), one point is added.
6) If the two markers of an overpriced stock noted above (see Columns AB and AD) indicate that the stock is indeed overpriced, half a point is subtracted.
The final SCORE is found in Column AJ.
Bottom Line: How to sell a stock is always harder to learn than how to buy a stock. The 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are great companies. So, those are even harder to abandon once you’ve seen the way their stocks perform in your portfolio. And, the prominence of these companies in the press is guaranteed to attract investors who don’t think they need to do their own due diligence before adding stock in a famous company to their portfolio. You see the problem: We have here the makings of a Perfect Storm that will hit someday.
Conclusion: There are 11 Dow stocks that appear to be overpriced now: MRK, MSFT, V, NKE, BA, UNH, MCD, KO, HD, JNJ and MMM. And, even though the stock market is generally thought to be overpriced, an equal number appear reasonably priced (see Column AJ in the Table): PFE, CSCO, DIS, AAPL, INTC, PG, TRV, JPM, WMT, CAT and UTX.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 1 = 10-yr US Treasury Notes, 5 = S&P 500 Index, and 10 = Gold bullion).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, BA, INTC, KO, PG, JNJ, JPM and CAT, and also own shares of PFE, CSCO, MCD, AAPL, TRV, WMT, MMM, XOM and IBM. (All dividends are automatically reinvested.)
My holdings of stock in those 18 “Dow” companies are meant to represent a cross-section of the US economy. But you shouldn’t think my future returns (adjusted for risk, transaction costs, and capital gains taxes) will beat The Dow. Only a full-time trader has better than a one in twenty chance of beating the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the next two market cycles. And that trader will likely find it necessary to buy and sell stock options (so as to protect large positions from market-turning events). She might also minimize transaction costs by working from a Globex Terminal, meaning her trades are guaranteed by a firm with Globex Registration at the Chicago Board of Trade.
The rational basis for us, as retail investors, to buy shares of stock in specific companies is to have a growing stream of Dividend Income during retirement years, while leaving Principal intact, i.e., the shares that generate those dividends would only be sold to handle a severe financial emergency.
P.S.: Warren Buffett advises his friends and family to invest 90% of their savings in a low-cost S&P 500 Index fund marketed by the Vanguard Group , such as VFIAX.
NOTE: This text was written on 5/6/2019.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight DJIA stocks that appear to be overpriced.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: It is almost impossible to distinguish an overpriced stock from a stock that is pulling in more investors because they see a bright future. If the company is already highly regarded because of its Balance Sheet, Product Lines, and Brand Penetration, I would hesitate to call its stock overpriced at any P/E (think of Amazon with its P/E of 81).
I’m a numbers guy, so I use two numbers to decide if a stock is overpriced (where “price” or P is defined as the 50-day moving average):
1) the 7-yr P/E is greater than 30.
2) the stock’s Graham Number, which is the square root of 22.5 times Earnings Per Share multiplied by Book Value Per Share, is more than 250% of its price.
If only one of those two numbers is over the limit, the stock is still overpriced if the other number is close to the limit, i.e., more than 25 or 200%, respectively. (For Amazon, those numbers are 53 and 752%. So, it’s overpriced and I sold my shares.)
Deciding whether or not to buy a stock is also tricky. To give a more nuanced estimate of a stock’s value to the investor, I’ve devised a Basic Quality Screen that has only 6 elements and a maximum score of 4 (see Table):
1) If price appreciation over the past 16 yrs has been greater than 1/3rd the risk of short-term loss as determined by the BMW Method, one point is added. In other words, price appreciation in Column K is greater than 1/3rd the risk in Column M.
2) If Tangible Book Value in Column S is negative and LT-debt represents more than 50% of Total Capital (Column O), or Total Debt is more than 250% of EBITDA (Column P), one point is subtracted.
3) If the S&P Bond Rating in Column U is BBB+ or better, one point is added.
4) If the S&P Stock Rating in Column V is B+/M or better, one point is added.
5) If Net Present Value of accumulated dividends and cash-out after a 10 year Holding Period is a positive number, when applying a Discount Rate of 10% (see Column Z), one point is added.
6) If the two markers of an overpriced stock noted above (see Columns AB and AD) indicate that the stock is indeed overpriced, half a point is subtracted.
The final SCORE is found in Column AJ.
Bottom Line: How to sell a stock is always harder to learn than how to buy a stock. The 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are great companies. So, those are even harder to abandon once you’ve seen the way their stocks perform in your portfolio. And, the prominence of these companies in the press is guaranteed to attract investors who don’t think they need to do their own due diligence before adding stock in a famous company to their portfolio. You see the problem: We have here the makings of a Perfect Storm that will hit someday.
Conclusion: There are 11 Dow stocks that appear to be overpriced now: MRK, MSFT, V, NKE, BA, UNH, MCD, KO, HD, JNJ and MMM. And, even though the stock market is generally thought to be overpriced, an equal number appear reasonably priced (see Column AJ in the Table): PFE, CSCO, DIS, AAPL, INTC, PG, TRV, JPM, WMT, CAT and UTX.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 1 = 10-yr US Treasury Notes, 5 = S&P 500 Index, and 10 = Gold bullion).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NKE, BA, INTC, KO, PG, JNJ, JPM and CAT, and also own shares of PFE, CSCO, MCD, AAPL, TRV, WMT, MMM, XOM and IBM. (All dividends are automatically reinvested.)
My holdings of stock in those 18 “Dow” companies are meant to represent a cross-section of the US economy. But you shouldn’t think my future returns (adjusted for risk, transaction costs, and capital gains taxes) will beat The Dow. Only a full-time trader has better than a one in twenty chance of beating the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the next two market cycles. And that trader will likely find it necessary to buy and sell stock options (so as to protect large positions from market-turning events). She might also minimize transaction costs by working from a Globex Terminal, meaning her trades are guaranteed by a firm with Globex Registration at the Chicago Board of Trade.
The rational basis for us, as retail investors, to buy shares of stock in specific companies is to have a growing stream of Dividend Income during retirement years, while leaving Principal intact, i.e., the shares that generate those dividends would only be sold to handle a severe financial emergency.
P.S.: Warren Buffett advises his friends and family to invest 90% of their savings in a low-cost S&P 500 Index fund marketed by the Vanguard Group , such as VFIAX.
NOTE: This text was written on 5/6/2019.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, January 27
Month 91 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Winter 2019 Update
Situation: We all have to eat, so food is an essential good. Even in a commodity bear market, the valuations of food and agriculture companies will likely hold up better than the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY - see Column D in this month’s Table). Which is amazing, given that grains and livestock account for 29% of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Another way of saying this is that the volumes of food sold are inelastic, much like gasoline. This gives investments in food and agriculture companies a special, almost unique, competitive advantage.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, September 30
Week 378 - Which “Dow Jones Industrial Average” Stocks Are Not Overpriced?
Situation: Is the US stock market overpriced? We need to know because Warren Buffett keeps reminding us how important it is to avoid overpaying for a stock. Buffet says: “No matter how successful a company is, don’t overpay for its stock. Wait until Wall Street sours on a company you like and drives the price down into bargain territory. By making a watch list of interesting stocks, and waiting for their prices to drop, you increase the potential for future capital gains.”
The author of this link suggests that none of us “mere mortals” are as smart as Warren Buffett at getting the price right. It’s perhaps better to either dollar-average your investment, or leave it to professionals to do the stock-picking for you. We suggest that there is a third option, which is to use a couple of simple mathematical formulas to guide your stock-picking. Those formulas can be found in the book that Warren Buffett calls “by far the best book on investing every written.” The book is entitled: The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, Revised Edition, Harper, New York, 1973. There, you will find the value of calculating the 7-year P/E instead of the usual 12-month P/E, and also learn how to calculate the “Graham Number.” The Graham Number is what the stock would sell for if it were priced at 1.5 times Book Value and 15 times trailing 12-month (TTM) earnings. Calculating and using the Graham Number is important because it allows for variation in Book Value and earnings. Multiplying the two values just has to be ~22.5 (15 X 1.5) for the stock to be optimally priced.
Mission: To test both methods on stocks issued by the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). See columns X, Y and Z on our Standard Spreadsheet (Table).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Here’s how to calculate the Graham Number, as shown on p. 349 in the book cited above). [Clicking this link will take you to the Amazon website and the book).] Start by multiplying 1.5 (ideal ratio of Book Value/share) by 15 (ideal ratio of TTM Earnings/share) = 22.5. By multiplying two numbers you have created a Power Function. So, you’ll have to take the Square Root of the Final Number to arrive at the Graham Number. Final Number = 22.5 X actual Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (new) X actual TTM Earnings/share. To access Earnings/share, go to any company’s page at Yahoo Finance, e.g. Apple’s. In the right column find EPS (TTM) of $11.038. To access Book Value/share, click on “statistics” at the top of that page and scroll down the left column to “Balance Sheet.” Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (mrq) is the last entry: $23.74. Graham Number = square root of 22.5 X $11.038 X $23.74 = $76.79. This is the true value (Graham Number) for a single share of Apple stock. If it sells for less, that’s a bargain. Right now, it’s selling for almost 3 times as much. If you own some shares, either think about selling those or think about the company’s ability to scale-up the “Apple ecosystem”. Perhaps you’ll decide that those prospects make holding onto the shares for a while longer a worthwhile risk.
Calculating the 7-Yr P/E (p. 159 in the book cited above). You’ll need a website that provides the past 7 years of TTM earnings, or a library with S&P stock reports. Simply add the most recent 7 years’ earnings and divide by 7 to arrive at the denominator. Look up the current price of the stock (or its 50 Day Moving Average price found in the right column of the statistics page under “Stock Price History”) to arrive at the numerator. Divide numerator by denominator to calculate the 7-Yr P/E, which must be 25 or less to reflect “normative” earnings growth over 7 years for a stock with a 12-month P/E of ~20 during most years. By using the 7-yr P/E you avoid being mislead by a year of blowout earnings or negligible earnings.
Bottom Line: As a group, these 30 stocks are overpriced. Nonetheless, 12 companies have stocks that are priced within reason vs. their Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es (see Columns X-Z in the Table): TRV, DIS, WBA, INTC, VZ, JPM, PFE, PG, GS, UTX, CVX, XOM. But only one company, Goldman Sachs (GS), can be called a bargain with respect to both values (those values being highlighted in green in the Table). Note that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B at Line 35 in the Table) is an even better bargain. Perhaps Warren Buffett noticed these markers of high intrinsic value when he recently spent part of Berkshire Hathaway’s cash hoard to buy back the stock.
Risk Rating: 5 where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into 3 stocks on the “not overpriced list” -- JPM, PG and XOM, and also own shares in two others: INTC and TRV. Additionally, I dollar-average into MSFT, KO, JNJ, WMT, CAT and IBM, and own shares in MCD, MMM and CSCO.
Comment: I focus on Dow Stocks because each is covered by dozens of analysts and business journalists, and its stock options are actively traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The result of this microscopic attention is that price discovery is efficient, and surprise earnings are rare. In addition, all 30 companies have a long record of business experience, and are large enough to have multiple product lines that provide internal lines of support during a crisis. DJIA companies are famously able to weather almost any storm: Seven DJIA companies went through a near death experience during The Great Recession of 2008-2009 (General Electric, Citigroup, General Motors, Pfizer, Home Depot, Caterpillar, and American Express) but only 3 had to be removed in the aftermath of that “Lehman Panic” (General Electric, Citigroup, and General Motors).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com.
The author of this link suggests that none of us “mere mortals” are as smart as Warren Buffett at getting the price right. It’s perhaps better to either dollar-average your investment, or leave it to professionals to do the stock-picking for you. We suggest that there is a third option, which is to use a couple of simple mathematical formulas to guide your stock-picking. Those formulas can be found in the book that Warren Buffett calls “by far the best book on investing every written.” The book is entitled: The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, Revised Edition, Harper, New York, 1973. There, you will find the value of calculating the 7-year P/E instead of the usual 12-month P/E, and also learn how to calculate the “Graham Number.” The Graham Number is what the stock would sell for if it were priced at 1.5 times Book Value and 15 times trailing 12-month (TTM) earnings. Calculating and using the Graham Number is important because it allows for variation in Book Value and earnings. Multiplying the two values just has to be ~22.5 (15 X 1.5) for the stock to be optimally priced.
Mission: To test both methods on stocks issued by the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). See columns X, Y and Z on our Standard Spreadsheet (Table).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Here’s how to calculate the Graham Number, as shown on p. 349 in the book cited above). [Clicking this link will take you to the Amazon website and the book).] Start by multiplying 1.5 (ideal ratio of Book Value/share) by 15 (ideal ratio of TTM Earnings/share) = 22.5. By multiplying two numbers you have created a Power Function. So, you’ll have to take the Square Root of the Final Number to arrive at the Graham Number. Final Number = 22.5 X actual Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (new) X actual TTM Earnings/share. To access Earnings/share, go to any company’s page at Yahoo Finance, e.g. Apple’s. In the right column find EPS (TTM) of $11.038. To access Book Value/share, click on “statistics” at the top of that page and scroll down the left column to “Balance Sheet.” Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (mrq) is the last entry: $23.74. Graham Number = square root of 22.5 X $11.038 X $23.74 = $76.79. This is the true value (Graham Number) for a single share of Apple stock. If it sells for less, that’s a bargain. Right now, it’s selling for almost 3 times as much. If you own some shares, either think about selling those or think about the company’s ability to scale-up the “Apple ecosystem”. Perhaps you’ll decide that those prospects make holding onto the shares for a while longer a worthwhile risk.
Calculating the 7-Yr P/E (p. 159 in the book cited above). You’ll need a website that provides the past 7 years of TTM earnings, or a library with S&P stock reports. Simply add the most recent 7 years’ earnings and divide by 7 to arrive at the denominator. Look up the current price of the stock (or its 50 Day Moving Average price found in the right column of the statistics page under “Stock Price History”) to arrive at the numerator. Divide numerator by denominator to calculate the 7-Yr P/E, which must be 25 or less to reflect “normative” earnings growth over 7 years for a stock with a 12-month P/E of ~20 during most years. By using the 7-yr P/E you avoid being mislead by a year of blowout earnings or negligible earnings.
Bottom Line: As a group, these 30 stocks are overpriced. Nonetheless, 12 companies have stocks that are priced within reason vs. their Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es (see Columns X-Z in the Table): TRV, DIS, WBA, INTC, VZ, JPM, PFE, PG, GS, UTX, CVX, XOM. But only one company, Goldman Sachs (GS), can be called a bargain with respect to both values (those values being highlighted in green in the Table). Note that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B at Line 35 in the Table) is an even better bargain. Perhaps Warren Buffett noticed these markers of high intrinsic value when he recently spent part of Berkshire Hathaway’s cash hoard to buy back the stock.
Risk Rating: 5 where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into 3 stocks on the “not overpriced list” -- JPM, PG and XOM, and also own shares in two others: INTC and TRV. Additionally, I dollar-average into MSFT, KO, JNJ, WMT, CAT and IBM, and own shares in MCD, MMM and CSCO.
Comment: I focus on Dow Stocks because each is covered by dozens of analysts and business journalists, and its stock options are actively traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The result of this microscopic attention is that price discovery is efficient, and surprise earnings are rare. In addition, all 30 companies have a long record of business experience, and are large enough to have multiple product lines that provide internal lines of support during a crisis. DJIA companies are famously able to weather almost any storm: Seven DJIA companies went through a near death experience during The Great Recession of 2008-2009 (General Electric, Citigroup, General Motors, Pfizer, Home Depot, Caterpillar, and American Express) but only 3 had to be removed in the aftermath of that “Lehman Panic” (General Electric, Citigroup, and General Motors).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com.
Sunday, August 12
Week 371 - Know What You’re Buying: Graham Numbers for “The 2 and 8 Club”
Situation: Stock prices are a function of 3 variables: book value, earnings, and market sentiment. The first two numbers come from the company’s most recent quarterly report. Market sentiment drives the movement in buy and sell orders for a particular block of shares on a public exchange. In the days before electronic trading systems took over, traders would get together after work and make back-of-the-envelope calculations of future book values and earnings for stocks that interested them. This would give them an idea about the price at which the company’s stock would open the next morning. Benjamin Graham gave traders a starting point for those discussions on page 349, Chapter 14, of his book The Intelligent Investor (cf. the Revised Edition of 2003, annotated by Jason Zweig). There he makes clear that a rational price is the square root of 15 times earnings/share (EPS) and 1.5 times book value/share (BVPS), which is the square root of 22.5 X EPS x BVPS. For example, on June 18, 2018, JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) closed at $108.17, with EPS of $6.35 and BVPS of $72.00. The Graham Number equals the square root of (22.5 X 6.35 X 72 = 10,287) or $101.42. Conclusion: JPM is 6.66% overvalued ($108.17/$101.42 = 1.0666).
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 22 companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” to include Graham Numbers.
Execution: see Columns Z and AA in this week’s Table.
Bottom Line: The average company on this list is overvalued by a factor of three (see Column AA), reflecting the end-of-times for the second longest Bull Market since the Great Depression. You have to ask yourself why you still own shares of a stock that is priced more than 3 times its fundamental value. Those reasons will always reflect market sentiment unless you know of a specific reason why earnings and book value are going increase above trend, and you’re almost certain it will play out that way.
Risk Rating: 7 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 22 companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” to include Graham Numbers.
Execution: see Columns Z and AA in this week’s Table.
Bottom Line: The average company on this list is overvalued by a factor of three (see Column AA), reflecting the end-of-times for the second longest Bull Market since the Great Depression. You have to ask yourself why you still own shares of a stock that is priced more than 3 times its fundamental value. Those reasons will always reflect market sentiment unless you know of a specific reason why earnings and book value are going increase above trend, and you’re almost certain it will play out that way.
Risk Rating: 7 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, August 5
Week 370 - Ways To Win At Stock-picking #1: Dollar-cost Average Into 10 Of The 30 DJIA Companies
Situation: You’re troubled by the dominance of the S&P 500 Index. After all, it is a derivative and you wonder whether it is really the safest and most effective way to build retirement savings. Your biggest concern is that it is a capitalization-weighted index, which is a design that favors momentum investing: Mid-Cap companies that garner investor enthusiasm become included in the S&P 500 Index because their stock is appreciating; Mid-Cap companies that have managed to be included in the S&P 500 Index investors are in danger of being excluded because investors have lost their enthusiasm and the stock’s price is falling. Many investors buy/sell shares in a company’s stock because of that trend in sentiment. Fundamental sources of value (revenue, earnings, and cash flow) often have little to do with their enthusiasm, or the fact that it has evaporated. Articles in the business press may carry greater weight, and those articles may be influenced by analyses introduced by short sellers, who are betting on a fall in price, or hedge fund traders with long positions, who are betting on a rise in price. In other words, most retail investors are paying attention to market sentiment when buying or selling shares, not due diligence that comes from a careful study of a company’s prospects and Balance Sheet.
Your second biggest concern is likely to be that few S&P 500 companies have a good credit rating backing their debts. In other words, they’re paying too high a rate of interest on the bonds they’ve issued, or the bank loans they’ve taken out. The company’s Net Tangible Book Value is therefore likely to be drifting deeper into negative territory because of interest expenses, part of which are no longer tax deductible due to changes in U.S. tax law.
Both of these problems fall by the wayside if you invest in the 30 companies that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average, either separately or together in the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DIA at Line 18 in the Table). Investing in the “Dow” may be a little smarter for retirement savers than investing in the S&P 500 Index (SPY at Line 16 in the Table) for two reasons: 1) DIA has a dividend yield that is ~10% greater; 2) DIA pays dividends monthly, whereas, SPY pays dividends quarterly. A higher dividend yield means that your original investment is returned to you more quickly, which translates as a higher net present value, if other factors (e.g. dividend growth and long-term price appreciation) are not materially different.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to illustrate how I dollar-cost average into stocks issued by 10 DJIA companies.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: It has been necessary to use 3 separate Dividend Re-Investment Plans (DRIPs) to dollar-cost average into the 10 DJIA stocks I’ve chosen (see Column AE in the Table). Those DRIPs automatically extract $100 each month for each of the 10 stocks; transaction costs average $18.68/yr (see Column AD), which includes automatic reinvestment of dividends. The expense ratio is 1.56% for each year’s investments, but expenses relative to Net Asset Value fall to less than 0.01% after 10-20 years.
Bottom Line: This week’s blog compares my long-standing pick of 10 Dow stocks (for an automatic monthly investment of $100 each using an online DRIP) to investing $1500/qtr in the entire 30-stock index (DIA) using a regional broker-dealer, which is something I’ve just started doing to facilitate comparison going forward. (You’ll see each year’s total returns in future blogs published the first week of July.)
Risk Rating: 6 (where U.S. Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: If one of the 10 stocks I’ve chosen is dropped from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I’ll sell those shares and use those dollars to start a DRIP with shares issued by another DJIA company.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Your second biggest concern is likely to be that few S&P 500 companies have a good credit rating backing their debts. In other words, they’re paying too high a rate of interest on the bonds they’ve issued, or the bank loans they’ve taken out. The company’s Net Tangible Book Value is therefore likely to be drifting deeper into negative territory because of interest expenses, part of which are no longer tax deductible due to changes in U.S. tax law.
Both of these problems fall by the wayside if you invest in the 30 companies that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average, either separately or together in the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DIA at Line 18 in the Table). Investing in the “Dow” may be a little smarter for retirement savers than investing in the S&P 500 Index (SPY at Line 16 in the Table) for two reasons: 1) DIA has a dividend yield that is ~10% greater; 2) DIA pays dividends monthly, whereas, SPY pays dividends quarterly. A higher dividend yield means that your original investment is returned to you more quickly, which translates as a higher net present value, if other factors (e.g. dividend growth and long-term price appreciation) are not materially different.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to illustrate how I dollar-cost average into stocks issued by 10 DJIA companies.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: It has been necessary to use 3 separate Dividend Re-Investment Plans (DRIPs) to dollar-cost average into the 10 DJIA stocks I’ve chosen (see Column AE in the Table). Those DRIPs automatically extract $100 each month for each of the 10 stocks; transaction costs average $18.68/yr (see Column AD), which includes automatic reinvestment of dividends. The expense ratio is 1.56% for each year’s investments, but expenses relative to Net Asset Value fall to less than 0.01% after 10-20 years.
Bottom Line: This week’s blog compares my long-standing pick of 10 Dow stocks (for an automatic monthly investment of $100 each using an online DRIP) to investing $1500/qtr in the entire 30-stock index (DIA) using a regional broker-dealer, which is something I’ve just started doing to facilitate comparison going forward. (You’ll see each year’s total returns in future blogs published the first week of July.)
Risk Rating: 6 (where U.S. Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: If one of the 10 stocks I’ve chosen is dropped from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I’ll sell those shares and use those dollars to start a DRIP with shares issued by another DJIA company.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, May 27
Week 360 - “The 2 and 8 Club” (Extended Version)
Situation: Market turmoil is turning stock and bond index funds into a “crowded trade.” Both are momentum investments, and both remain overvalued. Neither offsets the risk of the other. This is a good time to take some chips off the table and bulk-up your Rainy Day Fund. More importantly, it is a time to revisit the fundamentals of sound investing. For example, stop making “one-off” stock investments. Those are usually speculative. But follow Warren Buffett’s lead and continue to invest in strong companies by dollar-cost averaging. Those are “forever” investments that will likely prove worthwhile, through bear markets as well as bull markets, as long as you stay the course.
But how do we find “strong” companies? Experienced traders mainly offer 5 qualifiers: Look for 1) large and 2) well-established companies that have 3) strong Balance Sheets, and pay a 4) good and 5) growing dividend. We have converted those into numbers on a spreadsheet, and call it “The 2 and 8 Club.” We start by looking at the companies in the S&P 100 Index because those are required to have a robust market in Put and Call options (which facilitate Price Discovery). Approximately 20 of the 100 earn membership in our Club. Approximately 10 more companies on the Barron’s 500 List meet our requirements, allowing us to create an ~30 stock list (the Extended Version).
Mission: Produce a spreadsheet of the ~30 companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
Execution: see Table.
Administration: What are our criteria for meeting each of the 5 qualitative objectives?
Large companies
Those are the 500 on the Barron’s 500 List published each May (see Columns N & O in our Tables).
Well-established companies
Those are the companies on the Barron’s 500 List that are also on the 16-Yr list of companies that are quantitatively evaluated each week by using the BMW Method. See Columns K-M in our Tables.
Strong Balance Sheet
Companies must have an S&P Bond Rating of BBB+ or higher (Column T in our Tables). For more granularity on this topic, we provide key metrics: Long-Term Debt as a percent of Total Assets (Column P), Operating Cash Flow as a percent of Current Liabilities (Column Q), Tangible Book Value per Share as a percent of Share Price (Column R), Dividend Payout as a percent of Free Cash Flow (Column S), Weighted Average Cost of Capital vs. Return on Invested Capital (Columns Z and AA). Values in those 6 columns that we think of as sub-par are highlighted in purple.
Good Dividend
Companies must be listed in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index (US version). Those are the ~400 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that are judged by The Financial Times editors to have a dividend yield that is reliably above the market yield of approximately 2% (see Column G). The most convenient investment vehicle for that is the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The list is updated monthly, and you can access holdings here.
Growing Dividend
We require companies to have increased their dividend payout at least 8%/yr over the past 5 years (see Column H), as determined by calculating the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the most recent 4 quarters of regular dividend payouts vs. the same 4 quarters 5 years ago.
As a sanity check, we require that companies have historic returns relative to risk that is within reason for the retail investor, i.e., an S&P Stock Rating of at least B+/M (see Column U).
Finally, there are two important caveats that you need to keep in mind: 1) No one invests solely on the basis of numbers. The story behind a company’s stock has to be examined by using multiple online sources, and revisited at least monthly. 2) Every investor needs a Watch List to help her get started with each month’s research. “The 2 and 8 Club” is our Watch List.
Bottom Line: If you’re a downhill ski racer, your goal is to get to the Bottom Line safely and quickly. “Safely” is accomplished by setting up a few gates with line judges, and allowing you to “shadow” the course the night before. “Quickly” is assessed by using a stopwatch, combined with a video camera trained on the finish line. In other words, the activity is standardized to allow comparison with other racers and place limits on sanity. Stock picking isn’t much different. You need a starting place, a process governed by sanity checks, and a way to judge your performance. “The 2 and 8 Club” satisfies those basic needs. It will help give you a chance to outperform an S&P 500 Index enough to pay for the additional transaction costs and capital gains taxes that you’ll incur.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, PEP, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
But how do we find “strong” companies? Experienced traders mainly offer 5 qualifiers: Look for 1) large and 2) well-established companies that have 3) strong Balance Sheets, and pay a 4) good and 5) growing dividend. We have converted those into numbers on a spreadsheet, and call it “The 2 and 8 Club.” We start by looking at the companies in the S&P 100 Index because those are required to have a robust market in Put and Call options (which facilitate Price Discovery). Approximately 20 of the 100 earn membership in our Club. Approximately 10 more companies on the Barron’s 500 List meet our requirements, allowing us to create an ~30 stock list (the Extended Version).
Mission: Produce a spreadsheet of the ~30 companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
Execution: see Table.
Administration: What are our criteria for meeting each of the 5 qualitative objectives?
Large companies
Those are the 500 on the Barron’s 500 List published each May (see Columns N & O in our Tables).
Well-established companies
Those are the companies on the Barron’s 500 List that are also on the 16-Yr list of companies that are quantitatively evaluated each week by using the BMW Method. See Columns K-M in our Tables.
Strong Balance Sheet
Companies must have an S&P Bond Rating of BBB+ or higher (Column T in our Tables). For more granularity on this topic, we provide key metrics: Long-Term Debt as a percent of Total Assets (Column P), Operating Cash Flow as a percent of Current Liabilities (Column Q), Tangible Book Value per Share as a percent of Share Price (Column R), Dividend Payout as a percent of Free Cash Flow (Column S), Weighted Average Cost of Capital vs. Return on Invested Capital (Columns Z and AA). Values in those 6 columns that we think of as sub-par are highlighted in purple.
Good Dividend
Companies must be listed in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index (US version). Those are the ~400 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that are judged by The Financial Times editors to have a dividend yield that is reliably above the market yield of approximately 2% (see Column G). The most convenient investment vehicle for that is the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The list is updated monthly, and you can access holdings here.
Growing Dividend
We require companies to have increased their dividend payout at least 8%/yr over the past 5 years (see Column H), as determined by calculating the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the most recent 4 quarters of regular dividend payouts vs. the same 4 quarters 5 years ago.
As a sanity check, we require that companies have historic returns relative to risk that is within reason for the retail investor, i.e., an S&P Stock Rating of at least B+/M (see Column U).
Finally, there are two important caveats that you need to keep in mind: 1) No one invests solely on the basis of numbers. The story behind a company’s stock has to be examined by using multiple online sources, and revisited at least monthly. 2) Every investor needs a Watch List to help her get started with each month’s research. “The 2 and 8 Club” is our Watch List.
Bottom Line: If you’re a downhill ski racer, your goal is to get to the Bottom Line safely and quickly. “Safely” is accomplished by setting up a few gates with line judges, and allowing you to “shadow” the course the night before. “Quickly” is assessed by using a stopwatch, combined with a video camera trained on the finish line. In other words, the activity is standardized to allow comparison with other racers and place limits on sanity. Stock picking isn’t much different. You need a starting place, a process governed by sanity checks, and a way to judge your performance. “The 2 and 8 Club” satisfies those basic needs. It will help give you a chance to outperform an S&P 500 Index enough to pay for the additional transaction costs and capital gains taxes that you’ll incur.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, PEP, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, April 22
Week 355 - Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” with a Durable Competitive Advantage
Situation: It is now 10 years since The Great Recession began with the collapse of Bear Stearns. Trust in markets was broken and has barely begun to recover. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) grew out of The Great Depression because investors lost trust in markets. One of the ways it tried to rebuild trust was to require private companies to still have a strong balance sheet after a successful Initial Public Offering (IPO). If the SEC wasn’t convinced this would happen at the proposed price for the IPO, then the IPO wouldn’t be permitted.
Before the Great Recession of 2008, fewer than a third of companies in the S&P 500 Index had steadily growing Tangible Book Value (TBV), i.e., property, plant, equipment, and software priced at original cost (see Week 54, Week 94, Week 158, Week 241, Week 251, Week 271). After 2008, Balance Sheets were in need of repair, and that was facilitated by low interest rates. Now, perhaps a quarter of S&P 500 companies again have steady TBV growth.
Mission: Apply our Standard Spreadsheet to companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club” that have shown steady TBV growth (with no more than 3 down years) since 2008. Warren Buffett suggests that such companies have a Durable Competitive Advantage (see blogs listed above), as long as TBV meets the Business Case of doubling after 10 years (i.e., a growth rate of at least 7%/yr).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Risk works both ways for stock investors, i.e., you’ll either lose or gain +20% every few years. Our investing behavior isn’t governed by numbers, so we don’t act appropriately when warning signs of a market crash emerge. Why? Because we can’t know for certain when and whether a market crash will indeed happen. Many of us will remain sitting at the table even after it has clearly become a gambling table. You know when that occurs because the risk-off investors have already cashed out. Those of us who remain are governed by a desire to have. After a few market cycles, we come to realize that having more is going to be either boring or exciting, based on one’s appetite for risk. To have more, and have it be exciting, involves good study habits and an ability to live with chronic anxiety. Simply being human will matter less and less.
The trick is to maintain discipline 24/7/365, by using a system for monitoring and researching your investments. This has to be combined with a weird ability to stick with your system through good times and bad. Numbers won’t save you when the market is turning. Instead, you have to know whether or not the “story” that underpins the reason for each of your holdings has retained its agency. Truth be told, the moves you make (or don’t make) at turning points will come down to a gut feeling as to whether your holdings are overbought or oversold. Any decision you make at a turning point is a risk-on decision. Caveat emptor: This is not a formula for marital bliss. (Warren Buffett was mystified when his wife left to become an artist in San Francisco.)
Bottom Line: Now is a good time to have a boring investment posture, which means choosing to dollar-average into companies that have bullet-proof Balance Sheets and strong Global Brands. This week we look at the bedrock of strong Balance Sheets, which is steady growth in Tangible Book Value. Five of these 9 companies are part of S&P’s Finance Industry. Their strong Balance Sheets reflect the regulatory requirements of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. If Dodd-Frank becomes eroded by a Risk-on Congress, you’ll have to dig deeper into Annual Reports when investing in a Financial Services company. REMEMBER: common stocks issued by Financial Services and Real Estate companies are the most risky places to park your money, aside from commodity futures.
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE and JPM, and also own shares of CSCO and TRV.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Before the Great Recession of 2008, fewer than a third of companies in the S&P 500 Index had steadily growing Tangible Book Value (TBV), i.e., property, plant, equipment, and software priced at original cost (see Week 54, Week 94, Week 158, Week 241, Week 251, Week 271). After 2008, Balance Sheets were in need of repair, and that was facilitated by low interest rates. Now, perhaps a quarter of S&P 500 companies again have steady TBV growth.
Mission: Apply our Standard Spreadsheet to companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club” that have shown steady TBV growth (with no more than 3 down years) since 2008. Warren Buffett suggests that such companies have a Durable Competitive Advantage (see blogs listed above), as long as TBV meets the Business Case of doubling after 10 years (i.e., a growth rate of at least 7%/yr).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Risk works both ways for stock investors, i.e., you’ll either lose or gain +20% every few years. Our investing behavior isn’t governed by numbers, so we don’t act appropriately when warning signs of a market crash emerge. Why? Because we can’t know for certain when and whether a market crash will indeed happen. Many of us will remain sitting at the table even after it has clearly become a gambling table. You know when that occurs because the risk-off investors have already cashed out. Those of us who remain are governed by a desire to have. After a few market cycles, we come to realize that having more is going to be either boring or exciting, based on one’s appetite for risk. To have more, and have it be exciting, involves good study habits and an ability to live with chronic anxiety. Simply being human will matter less and less.
The trick is to maintain discipline 24/7/365, by using a system for monitoring and researching your investments. This has to be combined with a weird ability to stick with your system through good times and bad. Numbers won’t save you when the market is turning. Instead, you have to know whether or not the “story” that underpins the reason for each of your holdings has retained its agency. Truth be told, the moves you make (or don’t make) at turning points will come down to a gut feeling as to whether your holdings are overbought or oversold. Any decision you make at a turning point is a risk-on decision. Caveat emptor: This is not a formula for marital bliss. (Warren Buffett was mystified when his wife left to become an artist in San Francisco.)
Bottom Line: Now is a good time to have a boring investment posture, which means choosing to dollar-average into companies that have bullet-proof Balance Sheets and strong Global Brands. This week we look at the bedrock of strong Balance Sheets, which is steady growth in Tangible Book Value. Five of these 9 companies are part of S&P’s Finance Industry. Their strong Balance Sheets reflect the regulatory requirements of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. If Dodd-Frank becomes eroded by a Risk-on Congress, you’ll have to dig deeper into Annual Reports when investing in a Financial Services company. REMEMBER: common stocks issued by Financial Services and Real Estate companies are the most risky places to park your money, aside from commodity futures.
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE and JPM, and also own shares of CSCO and TRV.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, March 11
Week 349 - Dividend Achievers with high Long-term Debt offset by a Strong Global Brand
Situation: Some highly indebted companies manage to pass through economic cycles with little difficulty, even though though they sometimes find it expensive to roll-over (refinance) their Long-Term Debt. This is a conundrum, given the impairment of their Balance Sheets (debt maturing in more than one year represents more than one third of their total assets). Think of having $200,000 left on your mortgage but your household assets (including equity in your home) are only worth $600,000.
I try to avoid investing in such companies. When I do, I look for an excuse to sell. But there has to be a rational explanation for why these companies prosper, given the cost of servicing long-term debt. Two explanations come to mind:
1) These companies have a lower cost of capital, since so much of their capitalization is in the form of debt, where interest payments have not been taxed until recently. (The new tax law levies a 21% tax on interest payments that consume more than 30% of earnings.)
2) These companies have a strong Global Brand, which is an Intangible Asset that increases their acquisition value. That is, a strong Global Brand would increase the purchase price at least 5% above Tangible Book Value.
3) These companies sell products that are remarkably “inelastic”, meaning that sales volumes are insensitive to price: “The price elasticity of supply measures how the amount of a good that a supplier wishes to supply changes in response to a change in price.[2] In a manner analogous to the price elasticity of demand, it captures the extent of horizontal movement along the supply curve relative to the extent of vertical movement [in price]. If the price elasticity of supply is zero the supply of a good supplied is ‘totally inelastic’ and the quantity supplied is fixed.”
Mission: Analyze high-yielding Dividend Achievers (companies that have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years). Select companies that have long-term Debt amounting to more than 33% of Total Assets, as shown in Column P of the Table. Reject companies that do not have a strong Global Brand. Also reject companies that do not have A ratings from S&P for both the bonds and common stocks that they have issued (see Columns T and U in the Table). Brand rankings are shown in Columns AB-AC of the Table. Examine a comparison group of companies in the Benchmark Section of the Table.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: The outperformance and low price volatility of these stocks, even during difficult market conditions (see Column D in the Table), cannot be explained by unique Tangible Assets such as strong Patent Protections or Tax Advantages. That leaves Brand Values (i.e., consumers prefer a brand they can trust) and Inelasticity (i.e., unit sales are not price sensitive) to account for the resiliency of their stock prices. That resiliency ultimately comes from pricing power.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into Coca-Cola (KO), and also own shares of IBM and McDonald’s (MCD).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
I try to avoid investing in such companies. When I do, I look for an excuse to sell. But there has to be a rational explanation for why these companies prosper, given the cost of servicing long-term debt. Two explanations come to mind:
1) These companies have a lower cost of capital, since so much of their capitalization is in the form of debt, where interest payments have not been taxed until recently. (The new tax law levies a 21% tax on interest payments that consume more than 30% of earnings.)
2) These companies have a strong Global Brand, which is an Intangible Asset that increases their acquisition value. That is, a strong Global Brand would increase the purchase price at least 5% above Tangible Book Value.
3) These companies sell products that are remarkably “inelastic”, meaning that sales volumes are insensitive to price: “The price elasticity of supply measures how the amount of a good that a supplier wishes to supply changes in response to a change in price.[2] In a manner analogous to the price elasticity of demand, it captures the extent of horizontal movement along the supply curve relative to the extent of vertical movement [in price]. If the price elasticity of supply is zero the supply of a good supplied is ‘totally inelastic’ and the quantity supplied is fixed.”
Mission: Analyze high-yielding Dividend Achievers (companies that have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years). Select companies that have long-term Debt amounting to more than 33% of Total Assets, as shown in Column P of the Table. Reject companies that do not have a strong Global Brand. Also reject companies that do not have A ratings from S&P for both the bonds and common stocks that they have issued (see Columns T and U in the Table). Brand rankings are shown in Columns AB-AC of the Table. Examine a comparison group of companies in the Benchmark Section of the Table.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: The outperformance and low price volatility of these stocks, even during difficult market conditions (see Column D in the Table), cannot be explained by unique Tangible Assets such as strong Patent Protections or Tax Advantages. That leaves Brand Values (i.e., consumers prefer a brand they can trust) and Inelasticity (i.e., unit sales are not price sensitive) to account for the resiliency of their stock prices. That resiliency ultimately comes from pricing power.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into Coca-Cola (KO), and also own shares of IBM and McDonald’s (MCD).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, January 14
Week 341 - Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” with Strong Global Brands
Situation: You’d like to own stocks that won’t give you heartburn when the market crashes. There are only two ways a company can predictably weather a recession better than others in its industry. By having 1) a clean Balance Sheet (see Columns P-S in any of our Tables) and/or 2) a strong Global Brand. During a recession, consumers will have less money to spend because they’re not making as much. They’ll cut back on frills but keep spending on necessities marketed by companies they respect. Economists call such spending inelastic, and also speak of those companies as having a strong brand. Accountants struggle to define brand value, even though it obviously runs to the billions of dollars for a number of companies, so they call it an intangible asset.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze the 33 companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 329), selecting only those that have a Top 500 Global Brand.
Execution: see Table, where all 21 such companies are ranked by brand value in Column AC.
Administration: We need to know what fraction of sales for each company originate outside the United States. That information should be in every company’s Annual Report but is often missing. Perhaps the reason is that those companies often retain revenues in the country of origin (to avoid double taxation should revenues be repatriated to the USA). But we know that Microsoft, the largest company in this week’s Table, draws more than 60% of its revenues from outside the United States. Over the past 5 years, I have seen two articles estimating that 45-50% of all revenues for S&P 500 companies occur outside the United States.
For you to attempt to own shares in a third or half of the 21 companies on our list (see Table), you’ll need to keep track of two variables: 1) Dividends (Yield & Growth rates), and 2) Global Brand value. Both will change over time. Brand values are easy to follow (see link above). But some companies will mature in their market and no longer be able to grow dividends faster than 8% a year. A company might cut its dividend, in which case it would no longer be listed in the US version of the FTSE Global High Dividend Yield Index. There will also be new members of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
To move in and out of positions as indicated by your research, you’ll have to become an active stock trader. Dollar-cost averaging is still a good idea, but you’ll likely find that an online Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP) doesn’t have the flexibility you’ll require. A recent study of 13 broker-dealers offers detailed information about those that have the low transaction costs and attractive reward programs. Ally Financial (ALLY) is their top-ranked brand.
Bottom Line: There are only two ways a company can insulate itself from a looming recession: 1) maintain a Clean Balance Sheet, and 2) keep making money because of having a strong Global Brand. This week’s Table highlights 21 brand leaders, over half of which have clean Balance Sheets.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into MFST, MMM, IBM, KO and JPM, and also own shares of MO, TRV, PFE, CAT, and TXN.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze the 33 companies in the Extended Version of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 329), selecting only those that have a Top 500 Global Brand.
Execution: see Table, where all 21 such companies are ranked by brand value in Column AC.
Administration: We need to know what fraction of sales for each company originate outside the United States. That information should be in every company’s Annual Report but is often missing. Perhaps the reason is that those companies often retain revenues in the country of origin (to avoid double taxation should revenues be repatriated to the USA). But we know that Microsoft, the largest company in this week’s Table, draws more than 60% of its revenues from outside the United States. Over the past 5 years, I have seen two articles estimating that 45-50% of all revenues for S&P 500 companies occur outside the United States.
For you to attempt to own shares in a third or half of the 21 companies on our list (see Table), you’ll need to keep track of two variables: 1) Dividends (Yield & Growth rates), and 2) Global Brand value. Both will change over time. Brand values are easy to follow (see link above). But some companies will mature in their market and no longer be able to grow dividends faster than 8% a year. A company might cut its dividend, in which case it would no longer be listed in the US version of the FTSE Global High Dividend Yield Index. There will also be new members of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
To move in and out of positions as indicated by your research, you’ll have to become an active stock trader. Dollar-cost averaging is still a good idea, but you’ll likely find that an online Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP) doesn’t have the flexibility you’ll require. A recent study of 13 broker-dealers offers detailed information about those that have the low transaction costs and attractive reward programs. Ally Financial (ALLY) is their top-ranked brand.
Bottom Line: There are only two ways a company can insulate itself from a looming recession: 1) maintain a Clean Balance Sheet, and 2) keep making money because of having a strong Global Brand. This week’s Table highlights 21 brand leaders, over half of which have clean Balance Sheets.
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into MFST, MMM, IBM, KO and JPM, and also own shares of MO, TRV, PFE, CAT, and TXN.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 1
Week 326 - Investing for Income
Situation: Bonds or stocks? Which will give you a larger monthly check without disrupting your sleep? For stocks, the standard would be SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA), yielding 2.2%. For bonds, the standard would be iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), yielding 2.5%. So far, so good. But what if you want more income than those “plain vanilla” options provide? For example, a bond index fund that wouldn’t be hit for a big loss if inflation were to spike upward? Then you would want to be an investment-grade intermediate-term index fund like the Vanguard Interm-Term Bond Fund (BIV). If you’re a stock-picker and want more yield, you’ll need to start with a close look at the 400+ stocks in the Russell 1000 Index that yield more than a market average 2%. There’s an exchange-traded index fund (ETF) that holds positions in all such stocks: The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Our Table for this week pulls out 8 Dividend Achievers that we think do the job. But remember, you’d have to hold positions in all 8 to minimize selection bias. Then, you’d have an investment that yields ~2.7% and is likely to grow those dividends ~9%/yr.
Mission: Find A-rated Dividend Achievers with a higher yield than DIA, a clean Balance Sheet, and less volatility over the past 20 years than the S&P 500 Index.
Execution: We find 8 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that meet those criteria, except for minor Balance Sheet issues (see Table).
Bottom Line: Low-risk investments that yield more than 3% have almost disappeared. We find only two: WEC Energy Group (WEC) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Of course, there are some companies and government agencies that issue bonds paying a higher interest rate, but you’d have to invest $25,000 in each to avoid paying high up-front transaction costs. And, you’d need to have positions in several such bonds to minimize selection bias.
Risk Rating: 3 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: For equities, I dollar-average into NEE, PG and JNJ, and also own shares of TRV, WMT and MMM. For bonds, I own shares of BIV.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Find A-rated Dividend Achievers with a higher yield than DIA, a clean Balance Sheet, and less volatility over the past 20 years than the S&P 500 Index.
Execution: We find 8 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that meet those criteria, except for minor Balance Sheet issues (see Table).
Bottom Line: Low-risk investments that yield more than 3% have almost disappeared. We find only two: WEC Energy Group (WEC) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Of course, there are some companies and government agencies that issue bonds paying a higher interest rate, but you’d have to invest $25,000 in each to avoid paying high up-front transaction costs. And, you’d need to have positions in several such bonds to minimize selection bias.
Risk Rating: 3 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: For equities, I dollar-average into NEE, PG and JNJ, and also own shares of TRV, WMT and MMM. For bonds, I own shares of BIV.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, August 20
Week 320 - Key Players In The Food Chain That Have Tangible Book Value
Situation: As a stock-picker, you need to invest some of your assets in mature industries. Those are the industries where sales growth is a function of population growth. Companies in those industries typically retain value during recessions. Food & beverage companies are the prime example.
Mission: Set up a spreadsheet of key players in the food chain. Exclude any that do not have positive net Tangible Book Value. Why? Because the SEC requires that before a company can issue stock for sale on a public exchange. Include S&P stock and bond ratings, as well as key Balance Sheet debt ratios. Determine whether Free Cash Flow (FCF) covered company dividend payments for the last two quarters. Determine whether the company is an efficient deployer of capital by comparing Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). The latter number should be at least twice the former.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: You’re a stock-picker because you think you have a strategy for beating a broad market index fund (e.g. SPY). You’re unlikely to succeed unless you avoid paying Capital Gains taxes until after you drop into a lower tax bracket (i.e., retire). Try to stick with companies that issue A-rated bonds and stocks, and practice other risk-reducing measures (e.g. deploy capital efficiently, have a clean Balance Sheet, and build a strong brand).
You’re also unlikely to succeed if you invest in a volatile stock, i.e., one where the price varies more widely than the price of the S&P 500 Index. We identify that 3 ways:
1) Stock price change vs. change in the S&P 500 Index is greater in response to withdrawal of a key market support, e.g. the cost of taking out a loan or buying a house goes up 20%, or spot prices for key commodities go down 20% (see Column D in any of our Tables);
2) 5-Yr Beta exceeds 1 (see Column I in any of our Tables);
3) 16-Yr stock price volatility is statistically greater than S&P 500 Index volatility per the BMW Method, which we highlight in red (see Column M of any of our Tables).
Bottom Line: We have uncovered only 2 “buy-and-hold” stocks: Costco Wholesale (COST) and Coca-Cola (KO). Consider investing in a sector fund, e.g. SPDR Consumer Staples Select Sector ETF (XLP).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into KO and MON, and also own shares of HRL, COST, AGU, and WMT.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Set up a spreadsheet of key players in the food chain. Exclude any that do not have positive net Tangible Book Value. Why? Because the SEC requires that before a company can issue stock for sale on a public exchange. Include S&P stock and bond ratings, as well as key Balance Sheet debt ratios. Determine whether Free Cash Flow (FCF) covered company dividend payments for the last two quarters. Determine whether the company is an efficient deployer of capital by comparing Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). The latter number should be at least twice the former.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: You’re a stock-picker because you think you have a strategy for beating a broad market index fund (e.g. SPY). You’re unlikely to succeed unless you avoid paying Capital Gains taxes until after you drop into a lower tax bracket (i.e., retire). Try to stick with companies that issue A-rated bonds and stocks, and practice other risk-reducing measures (e.g. deploy capital efficiently, have a clean Balance Sheet, and build a strong brand).
You’re also unlikely to succeed if you invest in a volatile stock, i.e., one where the price varies more widely than the price of the S&P 500 Index. We identify that 3 ways:
1) Stock price change vs. change in the S&P 500 Index is greater in response to withdrawal of a key market support, e.g. the cost of taking out a loan or buying a house goes up 20%, or spot prices for key commodities go down 20% (see Column D in any of our Tables);
2) 5-Yr Beta exceeds 1 (see Column I in any of our Tables);
3) 16-Yr stock price volatility is statistically greater than S&P 500 Index volatility per the BMW Method, which we highlight in red (see Column M of any of our Tables).
Bottom Line: We have uncovered only 2 “buy-and-hold” stocks: Costco Wholesale (COST) and Coca-Cola (KO). Consider investing in a sector fund, e.g. SPDR Consumer Staples Select Sector ETF (XLP).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into KO and MON, and also own shares of HRL, COST, AGU, and WMT.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, July 16
Week 315 - High-quality Dividend Achievers That Beat The S&P 500 For 30 Years With Less Risk
Situation: The S&P 500 Index has risen faster than underlying earnings for the past 8 years. The main reason is that the Federal Reserve purchased over 3 Trillion dollars worth of government bonds and mortgages (including “non-conforming” private mortgages that carry no government guarantee). As intended, this flooded our economy with money that could be borrowed at historically low interest rates. Now the Federal Reserve is looking to start bringing that money back, by accepting the repayment of principal when loans mature instead of renewing (“rolling over”) the loans. This will result in a balance sheet “roll-off” that reduces the amount of money in circulation. Think of it as a “bail-in” to rebalance Treasury accounts, which will reverse the “bail-out” of Wall Street in 2008-9. Interest rates will slowly rise. Investors will once again have to consider the attractiveness of owning bonds in place of stocks. “Risk-on” investments, i.e., growth stocks and stocks issued by smaller companies, will be less sought after but “risk-off” investments (defensive stocks and corporate bonds) will be more sought after. Most of the stocks that have outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 25 years (see Week 314) and 35 years (see Week 313) have been issued by companies in “defensive” industries.
Mission: Look at 30 year statistics by using the BMW Method, to possibly find more stocks that outperform the S&P 500 Index while taking on less risk.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: We have turned up 3 new companies: two from defensive industries (Archer Daniels Midland “ADM” and Kimberly-Clark “KMB”) and one from a growth industry (WW Grainger “GWW”). That makes a total of 11 companies from the 4 S&P “defensive” industries (Utilities, Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Communication Services): CHD, MKC, BDX, WTR, ED, GIS, CVS, PEP, PG, ADM, KMB. And, 5 from the 6 S&P “growth” industries (Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, Information Technology, Materials, Energy, and Financial Services): APD, MMM, MCD, GPC, GWW.
In other words, the companies that make really good long-term investments are twice as likely to be from “risk-off” defensive industries than from “risk-on” growth industries. But think about what that implies, given that 2/3rds of the companies in the S&P 100 Index represent growth industries. If you want to beat the S&P 500 Index long-term, you’ll have to reverse that ratio and have 2/3rds of your money in defensive stocks.
Risk Rating: 5 (10-Yr Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, Gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I own shares of MCD, MMM, GIS, MKC.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Look at 30 year statistics by using the BMW Method, to possibly find more stocks that outperform the S&P 500 Index while taking on less risk.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: We have turned up 3 new companies: two from defensive industries (Archer Daniels Midland “ADM” and Kimberly-Clark “KMB”) and one from a growth industry (WW Grainger “GWW”). That makes a total of 11 companies from the 4 S&P “defensive” industries (Utilities, Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Communication Services): CHD, MKC, BDX, WTR, ED, GIS, CVS, PEP, PG, ADM, KMB. And, 5 from the 6 S&P “growth” industries (Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, Information Technology, Materials, Energy, and Financial Services): APD, MMM, MCD, GPC, GWW.
In other words, the companies that make really good long-term investments are twice as likely to be from “risk-off” defensive industries than from “risk-on” growth industries. But think about what that implies, given that 2/3rds of the companies in the S&P 100 Index represent growth industries. If you want to beat the S&P 500 Index long-term, you’ll have to reverse that ratio and have 2/3rds of your money in defensive stocks.
Risk Rating: 5 (10-Yr Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, Gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I own shares of MCD, MMM, GIS, MKC.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)