Situation: When I started investing, I picked up the phrase “stocks for widows and orphans.” Typically, Probate Court will assign fiduciary responsibility for investments made on behalf of a widow or orphan to lawyer. I later became acquainted with one of those and learned that she expected after-inflation returns from low-risk stocks to be well over 5%/yr. But she hadn’t fully considered transaction fees, taxes, or the need to balance stocks 50-50 with 10-yr US Treasury Notes (to hedge against what could be a catastrophic loss for a widow or orphan). And, few stocks make suitable long-term holdings in a portfolio that is supposed to be immune to gambling. Given that a stock broker’s main talent is to wisely supervise gambling, a broker is likely to welcome the prospect of building a portfolio of “boring” stocks that will have little turnover.
Many young but upwardly mobile “salary workers” face the same problem that lawyer is facing: how to invest wisely without gambling. I have 4 children who are trying to grapple with this problem; none have gained lasting satisfaction from consulting investment advisors. And, they don’t much like my advice, which is to research the problem and find their own solution, which is called DIY investing. But, they already have the most important asset: which is to be disinclined to gamble.
Starter Stocks, like those for widows and orphans, are usually (but not always) boring. Consumer Staples are most likely to be Starter Stocks, and Utilities are close behind. But then you’ll find that technology-related companies start to pop up from Health Care and Information Technology industries.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to screen out companies that are missing from either of the two key value indexes, which are the iShares Russell 1000 Value Index ETF -- IWD and the income-oriented variant of the Russell 1000 Index that was created as the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index but is marketed in the US as the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF -- VYM. Companies that issue bonds having an S&P rating lower than A- are also excluded, as are companies that issue stocks having an S&P rating lower than B+/M. Stocks must have a 16+ year trading record, to allow quantitative analysis by the BMW Method.
Administration: Most of the strategies that are likely to give high returns from owning stocks in a bull market also carry a high risk of loss in a bear market. So, when the market falls 25% those stocks might fall 50%. That means a 100% gain would have to occur over ensuing years just to get back to where the stock was priced when the last bull market ended. Banking and Finance faculty at business schools teach that this strategy is the only legal way to beat the market. In other words, reversion to the mean growth rate is sacrosanct. One way for an investor to hedge against such volatility is to pick stocks that go up or down less than 75% as much as the S&P 500 Index. In other words, exclude stocks with a 3-yr Beta that is higher than 0.75. Another way is to pick stocks issued by very large companies, namely those found in the S&P 100 Index. To be included in that index, companies are required to have an active market in put and call options at the Chicago Board Options Exchange, which means that “price discovery” for the underlying stock is efficient and relatively well insulated from “momentum” investors who are trading on the basis of fleeting rumors or sentiment. The other advantage of very large companies is that they have multiple product lines, at least one of which is expected to produce an attractively priced product during a recession. Integrated oil companies, for example, maintain a fleet of refineries that would be paying less for their feedstock (oil) during a recession--thereby allowing the company to make a nice profit from selling gasoline at a lower price than the customer had been used to paying.
Bottom Line: The problem with screening for “Starter Stocks” is that you’ll pull up some that are broadly thought of as desirable. Both gamblers and non-gamblers will bid up such stocks but forget to sell them when shares become overpriced. Given that most Starter Stocks (see Table) are found in channels of the economy that are already saturated (i.e., companies can grow their revenues no faster than GDP grows), there is little reason to hold overpriced stocks in expectation that earnings will explode upward. For example, the stocks issued by all four of the Consumer Staples companies on our list (KO, PG, PEP, WMT) are overpriced (see Columns AB to AD in our Table). You’ll have to figure out when to buy (or sell) overpriced shares of such high-value stocks. A common strategy is to buy more shares when the price drops 5-10% below its usual range. This is called the buy the dip strategy.
The easiest (and probably best) way to be certain of buying shares when they’re bargain-priced is to do it automatically. Sign up for a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) that takes a fixed amount of money out of your checking account on a specific date each month to buy more shares. That strategy is called dollar-cost averaging, and is the strategy that Warren Buffett favors to build a position in stocks that are often overpriced.
How well do our 10 Starter Stocks (at Line 10 in the Table) perform vs. the underlying ETFs -- VYM and IWD (at Lines 19 and 20)? Answer: quite a bit better (see Columns E, F and K).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, PG, INTC, WMT and JNJ, and also own shares of PFE, DUK, SO and PEP.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Showing posts with label volatility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label volatility. Show all posts
Sunday, September 29
Sunday, March 31
Month 93 - Members of "The 2 and 8 Club" in the S&P 500 Index - Winter 2019 Update
Situation: Some investors are experienced enough to try beating the market, but few tools are available to help them. Business schools professors like to point out that it is a settled issue, with only two routes are available: A stock-picker can either seek information from a company insider (which is illegal) or assume more risk (buy high-beta stocks). The latter route can provide higher returns but those will eventually be eroded by the higher volatility in stock prices. In other words, risk-adjusted returns (at their best) will not beat an S&P 500 Index fund (e.g. VFINX) or ETF (e.g. SPY).
Mission: Develop an algorithm for investing in high-beta stocks. Use our Standard Spreadsheet for companies likely to have higher quality.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: We call the resulting algorithm “The 2 and 8 Club” because it focuses on companies that a) pay an above-market dividend and b) have grown that dividend at least 8%/yr over the most recent 5 year period. Quality criteria require that a company’s bonds carry an S&P rating of BBB+ or better, and that its common stock carry an S&P rating of B+/M or better. We also require 16 or more years of trading records on a public exchange, so that weekly prices can be analyzed by the “BMW Method”. We use the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) as our benchmark, given that it rarely has a dividend yield lower than 2% or a dividend growth rate lower than 8%. And, we use the US companies listed in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) High Dividend Yield Index as our only source for stocks paying an above-market dividend. That index is based on the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. The Vanguard Group markets both a mutual fund (VHDYX) and an ETF (VYM) for the ~400 companies in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The same companies are found on each list, and weighted by market capitalization and updated monthly.
Bottom Line: As expected, this algorithm beats the S&P 500 Index (see Columns C, F, K & W) at the expense of greater risk (see Columns D, I, J & M). Its utility lies in risk mitigation (see Columns R & S), where the cutoffs for S&P rankings make these companies above-average for the S&P 500 Index with respect to the risk of bankruptcy. Only 23 companies in the S&P 500 Index qualify for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and only 5 of those are in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (JPM, TRV, CSCO, MMM, IBM). An additional 5 companies are found in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index but have insufficient market capitalization to be included in the S&P 500 Index (WSO, HUBB, SWX, EV, R; see COMPARISONS section in the Table).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into JPM and NEE, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, BLK, IBM, R and CMI.
Caveat Emptor: This week’s blog is addressed to investors who a) have been investing in common stocks for more than 20 years, b) don’t use margin loans, and c) have more than $200,000 available for making such investments. Most investors are best served by maintaining a 50-50 balance between stocks and bonds, e.g. by investing in the total US stock and bond markets (VTI and BND at Lines 30 & 38 in the Table). That 50-50 investment has returned ~8%/yr over the past 10 years and ~5%/yr over the past 5 years. The same result can be found by investing in a balanced mutual fund where stocks and bonds are picked for you: The Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX at Line 35 in the Table). Either way, you’re likely to have no more than 2 down years per decade: VWINX has had only 7 down years since 1970. NOTE: all of the stocks in VWINX are picked from the same FTSE High Dividend Yield Index that we use for “The 2 and Club”.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Develop an algorithm for investing in high-beta stocks. Use our Standard Spreadsheet for companies likely to have higher quality.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: We call the resulting algorithm “The 2 and 8 Club” because it focuses on companies that a) pay an above-market dividend and b) have grown that dividend at least 8%/yr over the most recent 5 year period. Quality criteria require that a company’s bonds carry an S&P rating of BBB+ or better, and that its common stock carry an S&P rating of B+/M or better. We also require 16 or more years of trading records on a public exchange, so that weekly prices can be analyzed by the “BMW Method”. We use the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) as our benchmark, given that it rarely has a dividend yield lower than 2% or a dividend growth rate lower than 8%. And, we use the US companies listed in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) High Dividend Yield Index as our only source for stocks paying an above-market dividend. That index is based on the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. The Vanguard Group markets both a mutual fund (VHDYX) and an ETF (VYM) for the ~400 companies in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The same companies are found on each list, and weighted by market capitalization and updated monthly.
Bottom Line: As expected, this algorithm beats the S&P 500 Index (see Columns C, F, K & W) at the expense of greater risk (see Columns D, I, J & M). Its utility lies in risk mitigation (see Columns R & S), where the cutoffs for S&P rankings make these companies above-average for the S&P 500 Index with respect to the risk of bankruptcy. Only 23 companies in the S&P 500 Index qualify for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and only 5 of those are in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (JPM, TRV, CSCO, MMM, IBM). An additional 5 companies are found in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index but have insufficient market capitalization to be included in the S&P 500 Index (WSO, HUBB, SWX, EV, R; see COMPARISONS section in the Table).
Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into JPM and NEE, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, BLK, IBM, R and CMI.
Caveat Emptor: This week’s blog is addressed to investors who a) have been investing in common stocks for more than 20 years, b) don’t use margin loans, and c) have more than $200,000 available for making such investments. Most investors are best served by maintaining a 50-50 balance between stocks and bonds, e.g. by investing in the total US stock and bond markets (VTI and BND at Lines 30 & 38 in the Table). That 50-50 investment has returned ~8%/yr over the past 10 years and ~5%/yr over the past 5 years. The same result can be found by investing in a balanced mutual fund where stocks and bonds are picked for you: The Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX at Line 35 in the Table). Either way, you’re likely to have no more than 2 down years per decade: VWINX has had only 7 down years since 1970. NOTE: all of the stocks in VWINX are picked from the same FTSE High Dividend Yield Index that we use for “The 2 and Club”.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, January 27
Month 91 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Winter 2019 Update
Situation: We all have to eat, so food is an essential good. Even in a commodity bear market, the valuations of food and agriculture companies will likely hold up better than the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY - see Column D in this month’s Table). Which is amazing, given that grains and livestock account for 29% of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Another way of saying this is that the volumes of food sold are inelastic, much like gasoline. This gives investments in food and agriculture companies a special, almost unique, competitive advantage.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
The most important development in recent years is that the sugar in corn kernels is being processed into ethanol for gasoline. And, to a lesser extent, soybean oil is being processed into diesel fuel (see Week 364). Two US companies are leaders in biofuels production, i.e., Valero (VLO) with a capacity of 1.4 billion gallons per year, and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) with a capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Animal feeds are an important by-product of ethanol production, marketed as dry and wet distiller grains, that capture 40% of the energy in a kernel of corn.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight important metrics for listed companies in the Food and Agriculture sector.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The 21 companies in the Table meet specific standards for quality, which are: S&P Bond Rating of BBB or better; S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or better; and trading records that extend for 16+ years to allow analysis by the BMW Method.
Bottom Line: In the aggregate, common stocks of these companies look to be a good bet (see Line 23 in the Table). Don’t be fooled. Eight of the 21 stocks track the ups and downs of futures markets in raw commodities (see red highlighted companies at the bottom of Column D in the Table). To build a position in any of those stocks you’ll need to employ dollar-cost averaging. And, only the two companies at the top of the Table have clean Balance Sheets (see Columns N-Q in the Table).
To invest successfully in this sector, you’ll need to do a lot of research on a continuing basis. For example, note that fertilizer companies and seed companies are missing from the Table. Why? Because of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions. If you had been an investor in now extinct companies like Monsanto, duPont, Dow Chemical, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, and Agrium, you’ll have gained from the pain but also lost money.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO, CAT, UNP and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and MKC.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, November 11
Week 384 - Which Dividend Achievers Are Likely To Be Safe & Effective Investments?
Situation: The US stock market is overpriced, as we have documented in recent blogs (see Week 378, Week 379, Week 380). So, the question becomes: Which companies will retain value (relatively speaking) during a correction, yet continue to reliably grow their earnings? We’re likely to find such companies in the 3 remaining Defensive Industries (Utilities, Consumer Staples, and HealthCare). S&P’s Defensive Sector used to include Telecommunication Services but that Industry has recently merged Media to become Communication Services. Newly added companies include Netflix (NFLX), Facebook (FB), Alphabet (GOOGL), Twitter (TWTR), Comcast (CMCSA), and Disney (DIS) -- all of which are Growth companies (as opposed to less risky companies in Defensive Industries).
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze high-quality companies in Defensive Industries that have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years (earning the S&P designation of Dividend Achiever).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: First, we need to define terms.
SAFE:
1) 16-Yr price volatility is less than that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA -- see Column M in the Table);
2) 3-Yr Beta is less than 0.7 (see Column I in the Table);
3) 7-Yr P/E is less than 36 (see Column Z in the Table);
4) S&P Rating on bonds issued by the company is A- or better (see Column R in the Table).
EFFECTIVE:
1) 16-Yr price appreciation is at least 1/3rd as great as 16-Yr price volatility (compare Columns K and M in the Table);
2) S&P stock rating is at least A-/M and S&P Stars rating is at least 3 (see Column S in the Table).
Bottom Line: To be clear, there is no such thing as a “safe” stock. When confidence in the company’s future cash flow evaporates, the stock is quickly priced at Tangible Book Value (TBV) per share. That value is out of reach to stockholders in the event of bankruptcy, since it serves as collateral for the company’s bond issues. So, this week’s blog has 4 criteria for safety (plus S&P’s criteria for its Dividend Achiever designation). When those are added to criteria for relatively stable price performance over the past 16 years, we are left with only 9 stocks to consider. Ask Santa Claus to put a sampling of those in your stocking this Christmas.
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JNJ, PG, WMT and DIA, and also own shares in PEP and HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze high-quality companies in Defensive Industries that have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years (earning the S&P designation of Dividend Achiever).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: First, we need to define terms.
SAFE:
1) 16-Yr price volatility is less than that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA -- see Column M in the Table);
2) 3-Yr Beta is less than 0.7 (see Column I in the Table);
3) 7-Yr P/E is less than 36 (see Column Z in the Table);
4) S&P Rating on bonds issued by the company is A- or better (see Column R in the Table).
EFFECTIVE:
1) 16-Yr price appreciation is at least 1/3rd as great as 16-Yr price volatility (compare Columns K and M in the Table);
2) S&P stock rating is at least A-/M and S&P Stars rating is at least 3 (see Column S in the Table).
Bottom Line: To be clear, there is no such thing as a “safe” stock. When confidence in the company’s future cash flow evaporates, the stock is quickly priced at Tangible Book Value (TBV) per share. That value is out of reach to stockholders in the event of bankruptcy, since it serves as collateral for the company’s bond issues. So, this week’s blog has 4 criteria for safety (plus S&P’s criteria for its Dividend Achiever designation). When those are added to criteria for relatively stable price performance over the past 16 years, we are left with only 9 stocks to consider. Ask Santa Claus to put a sampling of those in your stocking this Christmas.
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JNJ, PG, WMT and DIA, and also own shares in PEP and HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, October 21
Week 381 - Dividend-paying Production Agriculture Companies
Situation: Now we come to feeding the planet. Yes, row crops are a commodity so spot prices can go to extremes and stay there awhile. And yes, agricultural equipment makers can only sell product if farmers have money to spend. On the other hand, there have been improvements in satellite-based technology, 3rd party logistics, and financial services that dial back much of the risk introduced by weather. However, markets and prices have become sufficiently reliable that major countries no longer back up food supplies with large reserves. Similarly, investors are left to cope with consolidation brought on by global sourcing and improvements in planting and harvesting technologies. The supply chains for insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizer have been disrupted to such a degree that companies have had to enter into wave after wave of cross-border merger & acquisition activity. To their credit, Dow Chemical and DuPont are US leaders in the Ag Chemical space who have merged without bringing in companies from other countries. Even DowDuPont will have to split into 3 companies in order to devote one enterprise to Ag Chemicals and Seed Development: Corteva Agriscience.
Mission: Highlight the leading companies that support farm production by using our Standard Spreadsheet. Include beef, pork, and poultry processors that have a controlling interest in animal breeding and egg production facilities. Include IBM because it has a monopoly on weather satellites and owns The Weather Channel.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: This is a dicey area for investors, even those who make a study of it. The good news is that the common stocks in all 10 companies remain reasonably priced (see Columns Y-AA), which is saying a lot.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into IBM and CAT, and own shares of HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Highlight the leading companies that support farm production by using our Standard Spreadsheet. Include beef, pork, and poultry processors that have a controlling interest in animal breeding and egg production facilities. Include IBM because it has a monopoly on weather satellites and owns The Weather Channel.
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: This is a dicey area for investors, even those who make a study of it. The good news is that the common stocks in all 10 companies remain reasonably priced (see Columns Y-AA), which is saying a lot.
Risk Rating: 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into IBM and CAT, and own shares of HRL.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, September 9
Week 375 - Producers Of Gold, Silver And Copper In The 2017 Barron’s 500 List
Situation: Commodity producers have a dismal record. Spot prices fall whenever mining (or drilling or harvesting) becomes more efficient. To make matters worse, supply-chain management and investment has become increasingly global and professionalized. Nonetheless, copper sales remain the best barometer of fixed-asset investment, particularly the ongoing proliferation of industrial plants and equipment in China. Silver has a growing role, thanks to the buildout of solar power. And gold remains a check on the propensity of government leaders everywhere to finance their dreams with debt, as opposed to revenue from taxes.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight the largest companies producing gold, silver, and copper.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Gold and silver prices remain stuck where they were 35 years ago but are characterized by high volatility. Commodity prices (in the aggregate) trace supercycles that last approximately 20 years. The most recent came from a 1999 low and fell back to that level in 2016; since then it has ever so slowly risen from that low.
Bottom Line: The basic rule for commodity producers is that 3 years out of 30 will be good years, and you’ll make a lot of money. But over any 20-30 year period, you’ll lose money (measured by inflation-adjusted dollars). Our Table for this week confirms these points but does show that copper (SCCO) is worth an investor’s attention. But beware! That company’s share price is falling because of a falloff in trade with China and could fall further if a trade war takes hold.
Risk Rating: 10 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 = 5, and gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I do not have positions in any commodity producers aside from Exxon Mobil (XOM), but do dollar-average into the main provider of mining equipment: Caterpillar (CAT).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight the largest companies producing gold, silver, and copper.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Gold and silver prices remain stuck where they were 35 years ago but are characterized by high volatility. Commodity prices (in the aggregate) trace supercycles that last approximately 20 years. The most recent came from a 1999 low and fell back to that level in 2016; since then it has ever so slowly risen from that low.
Bottom Line: The basic rule for commodity producers is that 3 years out of 30 will be good years, and you’ll make a lot of money. But over any 20-30 year period, you’ll lose money (measured by inflation-adjusted dollars). Our Table for this week confirms these points but does show that copper (SCCO) is worth an investor’s attention. But beware! That company’s share price is falling because of a falloff in trade with China and could fall further if a trade war takes hold.
Risk Rating: 10 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 = 5, and gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I do not have positions in any commodity producers aside from Exxon Mobil (XOM), but do dollar-average into the main provider of mining equipment: Caterpillar (CAT).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, July 22
Week 368 - Are You A Baby Boomer (54 to 72 years old) With Only $25,000 In Retirement Savings?
Situation: Here in the United States, a third of you have less than $25,000 in Retirement Savings.
Mission: Assess options for a healthy married couple with a household income of $59,000/yr, whose breadwinner will retire when he or she reaches age 66 and the household starts receiving an initial Social Security check of $2,123/mo . Assume that they have $25,000 in retirement savings in an IRA, with an initial payout of $75/mo.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The options for the couple to receive an income from their $25,000 IRA are unattractive. They’ll need a relatively safe way to come up with an income of 3-4%/yr from that $25,000, a way that grows the principal at least as fast as inflation (historically 3.1%/yr). That growth rate can be predicted from the 5-yr growth rate for the quarterly dividend. To have enough confidence in that stream of income, their only option is to find half a dozen high-quality stocks with low price variance (5-yr Beta less than 0.7) and secure dividends.
They should be able to live reasonably well on $2,198/mo, given that the poverty line for a household of two is $1,372/mo. But let’s break it down: They’ll pay at least $900/mo for housing (rent, tenant’s insurance, and utilities), so they’re left with $1,300/mo to cover the consumer price index categories of food and beverages, apparel, transportation, medical care, recreation, education and communication, and other goods and services. “Other goods and services” include restaurant meals, delivery services, and cigarettes. Food will cost at least $250/mo. Now they’re down to ~$1,050/mo to cover clothing, car expenses, Medicare premium plus deductibles and co-payments, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. Owning, maintaining, and operating a used car for 5,000 miles/yr will cost ~$625/mo, which leaves $425/mo for clothing, healthcare, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. To avoid selling the car, one of them will need to find a part-time job. New clothes, dining out, and travel will be hard to fund. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs will go up, so they’ll need to save money by avoiding alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, and sweets.
Bottom Line: When a couple is facing a retirement that will be funded only by the average Social Security payout at full retirement age ($25,476/yr), they won’t be living much above the Federal Poverty Level for a household of two ($16,460/yr). It they own a home, they’ll no longer be able to afford to maintain it and pay property taxes. So, they’ll need to sell it and invest the residual equity. Maintaining their car will barely be affordable. Having $25,000 in an IRA will help, but a third of couples in their situation will retire with an even smaller cushion. In our Table for this week, we show how $75/mo is the expected income from an IRA of $25,000 value that has an average dividend yield of 3.6%/yr.
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Assess options for a healthy married couple with a household income of $59,000/yr, whose breadwinner will retire when he or she reaches age 66 and the household starts receiving an initial Social Security check of $2,123/mo . Assume that they have $25,000 in retirement savings in an IRA, with an initial payout of $75/mo.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: The options for the couple to receive an income from their $25,000 IRA are unattractive. They’ll need a relatively safe way to come up with an income of 3-4%/yr from that $25,000, a way that grows the principal at least as fast as inflation (historically 3.1%/yr). That growth rate can be predicted from the 5-yr growth rate for the quarterly dividend. To have enough confidence in that stream of income, their only option is to find half a dozen high-quality stocks with low price variance (5-yr Beta less than 0.7) and secure dividends.
They should be able to live reasonably well on $2,198/mo, given that the poverty line for a household of two is $1,372/mo. But let’s break it down: They’ll pay at least $900/mo for housing (rent, tenant’s insurance, and utilities), so they’re left with $1,300/mo to cover the consumer price index categories of food and beverages, apparel, transportation, medical care, recreation, education and communication, and other goods and services. “Other goods and services” include restaurant meals, delivery services, and cigarettes. Food will cost at least $250/mo. Now they’re down to ~$1,050/mo to cover clothing, car expenses, Medicare premium plus deductibles and co-payments, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. Owning, maintaining, and operating a used car for 5,000 miles/yr will cost ~$625/mo, which leaves $425/mo for clothing, healthcare, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. To avoid selling the car, one of them will need to find a part-time job. New clothes, dining out, and travel will be hard to fund. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs will go up, so they’ll need to save money by avoiding alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, and sweets.
Bottom Line: When a couple is facing a retirement that will be funded only by the average Social Security payout at full retirement age ($25,476/yr), they won’t be living much above the Federal Poverty Level for a household of two ($16,460/yr). It they own a home, they’ll no longer be able to afford to maintain it and pay property taxes. So, they’ll need to sell it and invest the residual equity. Maintaining their car will barely be affordable. Having $25,000 in an IRA will help, but a third of couples in their situation will retire with an even smaller cushion. In our Table for this week, we show how $75/mo is the expected income from an IRA of $25,000 value that has an average dividend yield of 3.6%/yr.
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, July 15
Week 367 - Safe and Effective Stocks
Situation: The stock market is becalmed, waiting for wind to fill its sails. "Risk-On" investors seem to be out of ideas, except for a renewal of interest in the energy sector. The bond market is experiencing hard-to-predict volatility. Safe stocks that will grow your money effectively are hard to find. The formula for Net Present Value tells us that more value is found when your original investment is returned to you quickly. Therefore, an “effective” stock is one that pays a good and growing dividend.
Mission: “Safe stocks” = an oxymoron. Basically, we’re looking for a group of high-quality stocks issued by companies in “defensive” industries (Utilities, HealthCare, Consumer Staples, and Communication Services). “Effective stocks” are those that a) pay an above-market dividend, b) grow that dividend at an above-market rate, and c) have an above-market 16-Yr CAGR. Our reference for the “market” is the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: What are “high-quality” stocks? Those are either “Blue Chips” (see Week 361) or members of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 327 and Week 348) plus its Extended Version (see Week 362). “Safe and effective” stocks are those that have no red highlights in Columns D, E, G, I, K, and M of the reference Tables. (Red highlights indicate underperformance vs. DIA.) In addition, we require that the company be a Dividend Achiever, and that its long-term bonds have an S&P rating of A- or better (see Column T).
Bottom Line: We find that only 5 companies issue “safe and effective” stocks (see Table). Were you to own shares of similar value in all 5, you wouldn’t be gambling. In other words, your risk-adjusted returns would likely “beat the market” by 1-2%/yr over a market cycle. But your transaction costs would also be 1-2% higher vs. owning shares in the leading S&P 500 Index Fund (SPY).
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: “Safe stocks” = an oxymoron. Basically, we’re looking for a group of high-quality stocks issued by companies in “defensive” industries (Utilities, HealthCare, Consumer Staples, and Communication Services). “Effective stocks” are those that a) pay an above-market dividend, b) grow that dividend at an above-market rate, and c) have an above-market 16-Yr CAGR. Our reference for the “market” is the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: What are “high-quality” stocks? Those are either “Blue Chips” (see Week 361) or members of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 327 and Week 348) plus its Extended Version (see Week 362). “Safe and effective” stocks are those that have no red highlights in Columns D, E, G, I, K, and M of the reference Tables. (Red highlights indicate underperformance vs. DIA.) In addition, we require that the company be a Dividend Achiever, and that its long-term bonds have an S&P rating of A- or better (see Column T).
Bottom Line: We find that only 5 companies issue “safe and effective” stocks (see Table). Were you to own shares of similar value in all 5, you wouldn’t be gambling. In other words, your risk-adjusted returns would likely “beat the market” by 1-2%/yr over a market cycle. But your transaction costs would also be 1-2% higher vs. owning shares in the leading S&P 500 Index Fund (SPY).
Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, May 20
Week 359 - Gold Can Be Useful To Own When Markets Are In Turmoil
Situation: On April 2, 2018, a new downtrend began for the US stock market according to Dow Theory. This officially ends the Bull Market that began on March 9, 2009. Gold now becomes one of the go-to destinations for traders, along with other “safe haven” investments like Japanese Yen, Swiss Francs, US dollars, and US Treasury Bonds. When traders stop moving new money into stocks and instead resort to a safe haven, they often move some into SPDR Gold Shares (GLD at Line 15 in the Table).
Why has the US stock market embarked on a primary downtrend? Because the risk of a Trade War has increased. But it’s a perfect storm because the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Treasury has also put the US stock and bond markets at risk by steadily increasing short-term interest rates. Normally when the economy falters, bonds are a good alternative to stocks. The exception happens when the FOMC raises short-term interest rates to ward off inflation: Long-term rates also rise, giving their new investors an asset that is falling in value.
An option to buying gold bullion (GLD) is to buy stock in mining companies. Gold miners are emerging from difficult times, given that the 2014-2016 commodities crash caught them competing on the basis of growth in production, which they had funded with ever-increasing debt. Now they are paying down that debt and instead competing on the basis of free cash flow, in order to reward investors (i.e., buy back stock and increase dividends).
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze gold-linked investments, as well as short-term bonds. Include manufacturers of mining equipment, and other enablers like railroads and banks.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Some advisors suggest that gold should represent 3-5% of your retirement savings. However, gold has marked price volatility but remains at approximately the same price it had 30 years ago. If you plan to hold it long-term, you’d best think of it as one of your Rainy Day Fund holdings (see Week 291).
What actions are reasonable to take when Dow Theory declares that stocks are entering a new downtrend? Gold is one of the 5 places to consider routing new money instead of stocks, the others being US dollars, Japanese Yen, Swiss Francs, and US Treasury Bonds. We’ve shown that US Treasury Bonds are not a suitable choice in a rising interest rate environment. For US investors, that leaves gold and US dollars as safe haven investments. The most inflation-resistant way to invest in US dollars is to dollar-average into 2-Yr US Treasury Notes or Inflation-protected US Savings Bonds at no cost through the government website. But for traders who are willing to pay transaction costs, the 1-3 Year Treasury Note ETF (SHY at Line 15 in the Table) is more convenient.
How best to invest in gold? Let’s start with the old lesson about how to profit from gold mining, learned during the California gold rush of 1949: Gold miners don’t make much money but their enablers do. Those are the bankers who loan them money, and the owners of companies that provide them with equipment, consumables and transportation. Go to any open-pit gold mine and the first thing you’ll notice is the massive yellow-painted trucks carrying ore. Those are made by Caterpillar (CAT at Line 6 in the Table).
Now look at the top of the Table. The second company listed is Union Pacific (UNP). This highlights the fact that ores recovered at any mine have to be transported to smelters. The fourth company, Royal Gold (RGLD), is a Financial Services company. This highlights the fact that bankers can profit greatly from loaning money to gold miners, provided they do it in an unusual way, which is issuing loans that don’t have to be repaid in dollars but instead can be repaid by the grant of either a royalty or a specified fraction (“stream”) of gold produced over the lifetime of the mine. Royal Gold (GLD) prefers royalty contracts. The other two Financial Services companies that service gold miners prefer streaming contracts: Franco-Nevada (FNV) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM).
Bottom Line: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) will be in demand until Dow Theory declares that the downtrend in US stocks has been reversed. 2-Yr US Treasury Notes (SHY) will be in demand until the FOMC stops raising short-term interest rates.
Risk Rating: 10 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into CAT, UNP and 2-Yr US Treasury Notes, and also own shares of WPM.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 20187 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Why has the US stock market embarked on a primary downtrend? Because the risk of a Trade War has increased. But it’s a perfect storm because the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the US Treasury has also put the US stock and bond markets at risk by steadily increasing short-term interest rates. Normally when the economy falters, bonds are a good alternative to stocks. The exception happens when the FOMC raises short-term interest rates to ward off inflation: Long-term rates also rise, giving their new investors an asset that is falling in value.
An option to buying gold bullion (GLD) is to buy stock in mining companies. Gold miners are emerging from difficult times, given that the 2014-2016 commodities crash caught them competing on the basis of growth in production, which they had funded with ever-increasing debt. Now they are paying down that debt and instead competing on the basis of free cash flow, in order to reward investors (i.e., buy back stock and increase dividends).
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze gold-linked investments, as well as short-term bonds. Include manufacturers of mining equipment, and other enablers like railroads and banks.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: Some advisors suggest that gold should represent 3-5% of your retirement savings. However, gold has marked price volatility but remains at approximately the same price it had 30 years ago. If you plan to hold it long-term, you’d best think of it as one of your Rainy Day Fund holdings (see Week 291).
What actions are reasonable to take when Dow Theory declares that stocks are entering a new downtrend? Gold is one of the 5 places to consider routing new money instead of stocks, the others being US dollars, Japanese Yen, Swiss Francs, and US Treasury Bonds. We’ve shown that US Treasury Bonds are not a suitable choice in a rising interest rate environment. For US investors, that leaves gold and US dollars as safe haven investments. The most inflation-resistant way to invest in US dollars is to dollar-average into 2-Yr US Treasury Notes or Inflation-protected US Savings Bonds at no cost through the government website. But for traders who are willing to pay transaction costs, the 1-3 Year Treasury Note ETF (SHY at Line 15 in the Table) is more convenient.
How best to invest in gold? Let’s start with the old lesson about how to profit from gold mining, learned during the California gold rush of 1949: Gold miners don’t make much money but their enablers do. Those are the bankers who loan them money, and the owners of companies that provide them with equipment, consumables and transportation. Go to any open-pit gold mine and the first thing you’ll notice is the massive yellow-painted trucks carrying ore. Those are made by Caterpillar (CAT at Line 6 in the Table).
Now look at the top of the Table. The second company listed is Union Pacific (UNP). This highlights the fact that ores recovered at any mine have to be transported to smelters. The fourth company, Royal Gold (RGLD), is a Financial Services company. This highlights the fact that bankers can profit greatly from loaning money to gold miners, provided they do it in an unusual way, which is issuing loans that don’t have to be repaid in dollars but instead can be repaid by the grant of either a royalty or a specified fraction (“stream”) of gold produced over the lifetime of the mine. Royal Gold (GLD) prefers royalty contracts. The other two Financial Services companies that service gold miners prefer streaming contracts: Franco-Nevada (FNV) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM).
Bottom Line: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) will be in demand until Dow Theory declares that the downtrend in US stocks has been reversed. 2-Yr US Treasury Notes (SHY) will be in demand until the FOMC stops raising short-term interest rates.
Risk Rating: 10 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into CAT, UNP and 2-Yr US Treasury Notes, and also own shares of WPM.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 20187 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, May 13
Week 358 - Hedge the Crash With Low-Beta Dividend Achievers
Situation: It’s really tough to own stocks when the market crumps. Yes, you can follow Warren Buffett’s advice and tough it out with dollar-cost averaging. His other main idea, which is to buy great businesses at a fair price, may be useful someday down the road. He hasn’t been able to find any in this overpriced market, and neither will you. But after the market crashes, you’ll both be glad you kept a hefty dollop of cash in reserve to serve that very purpose.
But what about hedging against the crash? That’s what hedge funds are supposed to do. Why can’t you and I do it? It’s not that simple. Hedging means that your portfolio pulls ahead in a Bear Market but lags on a Bull Market. Given that the market is historically up 3 years out of 4, you see the problem with hedging. But looking deeper, volatility is what you want to hedge against. You can do that year in and year out by adopting the “School Solution”: overweight low-beta stocks in your portfolio at all times.
By hedging against volatility, your portfolio won’t necessarily fall behind in a Bull Market. Having less volatility only means that your gains will be less than those for the S&P 500 Index in a Bull Market, AND your losses will be less in a Bear Market. It doesn’t mean you’ll underperform that Index long-term. Why? Because trending stocks become overbought in a Bull Market. But you’re underweighting those high-beta Financial Services and Information Technology stocks! Half of the market capitalization in the S&P 500 Index is currently in those two industries, vs. the long-term average of 30%. Owning high-beta stocks will make you richer faster, but you’ll have to do daily research so that you know when to BUY and when to SELL. My approach to those two industries is to dollar-average into Microsoft (MSFT), International Business Machines (IBM) and JP Morgan Chase (JPM). And keep dollar-averaging no matter what.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet to identify low-beta stocks of high quality:
1. S&P Bond Ratings of A- or better (Column T in the Table);
2. S&P Stock Ratings of B+/M or better (Column U in the Table);
3. 5-Yr Beta of less than 0.7 (Column I in the Table);
4. Lower statistical risk of loss than the S&P 500 Index (Column M in the Table);
5. Higher Finance Value than the S&P 500 Index (Column E in the Table)
6. Dividend Achiever status (Column AC in the Table).
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: Try not to be a momentum investor. The exciting stories that underlie every Bull Market create a crowded trade for stocks issued by Financial Services and Information Technology companies. To usefully deploy the cash that’s rolling into their coffers, those companies will try to innovate and deploy new services and equipment sooner than planned. Things will get messy, bordering on chaos. Parts of the “story” will collapse, or end in court. Current examples abound. So, we’re back to the Tortoise and Hare story because it will be trotted out at the end of every market cycle. Will you channel the Hare, or will you channel the Tortoise?
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, PEP and NKE, and also own shares of KO and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
But what about hedging against the crash? That’s what hedge funds are supposed to do. Why can’t you and I do it? It’s not that simple. Hedging means that your portfolio pulls ahead in a Bear Market but lags on a Bull Market. Given that the market is historically up 3 years out of 4, you see the problem with hedging. But looking deeper, volatility is what you want to hedge against. You can do that year in and year out by adopting the “School Solution”: overweight low-beta stocks in your portfolio at all times.
By hedging against volatility, your portfolio won’t necessarily fall behind in a Bull Market. Having less volatility only means that your gains will be less than those for the S&P 500 Index in a Bull Market, AND your losses will be less in a Bear Market. It doesn’t mean you’ll underperform that Index long-term. Why? Because trending stocks become overbought in a Bull Market. But you’re underweighting those high-beta Financial Services and Information Technology stocks! Half of the market capitalization in the S&P 500 Index is currently in those two industries, vs. the long-term average of 30%. Owning high-beta stocks will make you richer faster, but you’ll have to do daily research so that you know when to BUY and when to SELL. My approach to those two industries is to dollar-average into Microsoft (MSFT), International Business Machines (IBM) and JP Morgan Chase (JPM). And keep dollar-averaging no matter what.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet to identify low-beta stocks of high quality:
1. S&P Bond Ratings of A- or better (Column T in the Table);
2. S&P Stock Ratings of B+/M or better (Column U in the Table);
3. 5-Yr Beta of less than 0.7 (Column I in the Table);
4. Lower statistical risk of loss than the S&P 500 Index (Column M in the Table);
5. Higher Finance Value than the S&P 500 Index (Column E in the Table)
6. Dividend Achiever status (Column AC in the Table).
Execution: see Table.
Bottom Line: Try not to be a momentum investor. The exciting stories that underlie every Bull Market create a crowded trade for stocks issued by Financial Services and Information Technology companies. To usefully deploy the cash that’s rolling into their coffers, those companies will try to innovate and deploy new services and equipment sooner than planned. Things will get messy, bordering on chaos. Parts of the “story” will collapse, or end in court. Current examples abound. So, we’re back to the Tortoise and Hare story because it will be trotted out at the end of every market cycle. Will you channel the Hare, or will you channel the Tortoise?
Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, PEP and NKE, and also own shares of KO and JNJ.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, April 29
Week 356 - Defensive Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” (Extended Version)
Situation: You don’t want to lose money but you’re starting to. That comes with having your savings in an overbought stock market. It’s time for a cautionary warning light to click on in your head. That would mean moving some money into cash equivalents and making sure that at least a third of your stock portfolio is in defensive stocks, i.e., utility, healthcare, consumer staples, and telecommunication services companies. And, review the stocks you’re dollar-averaging into. Be comfortable with the prospect of building up your share-count in those stocks throughout a market crash.
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet on defensive companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” (Extended Version).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: If their dividend growth rates continue to fall, Coca-Cola (KO) and Pfizer (PFE) will no longer be members of “The 2 and 8 Club.” Conversely, Hormel Foods (HRL at Line 13 in the Table) recently raised its dividend and now has a yield that is well above the yield for the S&P 500 Index. That means it will soon be included in the US version of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. HRL already meets the other requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club.” So, it will become a member upon being listed in that Index. The ETF for that Index is VYM (the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF at Line 18 in the Table).
Bottom Line: There aren’t a lot of great defensive stocks, but the 8 included in “The 2 and 8 Club” are worth your close attention. Why? Because a set of trade policies are being promulgated by several countries that restrict the cross-border flow of goods and services. If those policies blossom into a tit-for-tat Trade War, Robert Shiller (Nobel Prize winning economist) thinks a recession would be triggered: “It’s just chaos,” he said on CNBC. “It will slow down development in the future if people think that this kind of thing is likely.”
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NextEra Energy (NEE) and PepsiCo (PEP), and also own shares of Coca-Cola (KO) and Hormel Foods (HRL).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet on defensive companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” (Extended Version).
Execution: see Table.
Administration: If their dividend growth rates continue to fall, Coca-Cola (KO) and Pfizer (PFE) will no longer be members of “The 2 and 8 Club.” Conversely, Hormel Foods (HRL at Line 13 in the Table) recently raised its dividend and now has a yield that is well above the yield for the S&P 500 Index. That means it will soon be included in the US version of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. HRL already meets the other requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club.” So, it will become a member upon being listed in that Index. The ETF for that Index is VYM (the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF at Line 18 in the Table).
Bottom Line: There aren’t a lot of great defensive stocks, but the 8 included in “The 2 and 8 Club” are worth your close attention. Why? Because a set of trade policies are being promulgated by several countries that restrict the cross-border flow of goods and services. If those policies blossom into a tit-for-tat Trade War, Robert Shiller (Nobel Prize winning economist) thinks a recession would be triggered: “It’s just chaos,” he said on CNBC. “It will slow down development in the future if people think that this kind of thing is likely.”
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)
Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NextEra Energy (NEE) and PepsiCo (PEP), and also own shares of Coca-Cola (KO) and Hormel Foods (HRL).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, March 4
Week 348 - Capitalization-weighted Index of “The 2 and 8 Club”
Situation: Whatever your stock-picking method, you need to decide how to manage large vs. small company stocks. If most of your stocks are issued by S&P 500 companies, your benchmark is the S&P 500 Index. It’s the greyhound you’re trying to catch. You won’t be able to keep up unless you invest more in mega-cap stocks than in the remaining companies of the S&P 500 Index. (I’ll bet you wish you’d owned Boeing stock going into 2017.)
Our stock-picking method is to invest in mega-caps, specifically the S&P 100 Index companies that represent 63% of the market capitalization of the S&P 500. Membership in that Index requires their stocks to have active “exchange-listed options” on the CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange). That’s important because a strong market in Put and Call Options means that there will be accurate and prompt price discovery, which is the best way to protect investors from a sudden collapse in price.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to list the 22 S&P 100 companies that are in “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 327).
Execution: see Table listing those 22 stocks by market capitalization.
Administration: We confine our attention to S&P 100 companies among the ~400 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that pay a stable above-market dividend, one that is usually above 2%/yr. The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a capitalization-weighted Index of those 400 companies, and is updated monthly. We reject companies that have not grown their dividend ~8%/yr (or faster) over the most recent 5-Yr period.
There are currently 22 members of “The 2 and 8 Club”. All 22 companies have BBB+ or better S&P Bond Ratings, and B+/M or better S&P Stock Ratings. Additionally, all 22 have at least the 16-yr trading record that is required for quantitative analysis by the BMW Method, which is based on stock prices that are updated every Sunday.
Bottom Line: These 22 stocks collectively have greater volatility (see Column M in the Table) but higher long-term total returns (see Column C in the Table), than the S&P 500 Index (see the ETF SPY at Line 32 in the Table). Only 7 of the 22 have less price volatility than the S&P 500 Index (see Column M): KO, PEP, IBM, MO, UPS, NEE, TGT. If you’re not a gambler, stick to investing in those and the benchmark ETFs (SPY and VYM).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into MSFT, JPM, KO and NEE, and also own shares of PFE, CSCO, PEP, IBM, MMM, MO, AMGN, TXN, CAT and TGT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Our stock-picking method is to invest in mega-caps, specifically the S&P 100 Index companies that represent 63% of the market capitalization of the S&P 500. Membership in that Index requires their stocks to have active “exchange-listed options” on the CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange). That’s important because a strong market in Put and Call Options means that there will be accurate and prompt price discovery, which is the best way to protect investors from a sudden collapse in price.
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to list the 22 S&P 100 companies that are in “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 327).
Execution: see Table listing those 22 stocks by market capitalization.
Administration: We confine our attention to S&P 100 companies among the ~400 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that pay a stable above-market dividend, one that is usually above 2%/yr. The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a capitalization-weighted Index of those 400 companies, and is updated monthly. We reject companies that have not grown their dividend ~8%/yr (or faster) over the most recent 5-Yr period.
There are currently 22 members of “The 2 and 8 Club”. All 22 companies have BBB+ or better S&P Bond Ratings, and B+/M or better S&P Stock Ratings. Additionally, all 22 have at least the 16-yr trading record that is required for quantitative analysis by the BMW Method, which is based on stock prices that are updated every Sunday.
Bottom Line: These 22 stocks collectively have greater volatility (see Column M in the Table) but higher long-term total returns (see Column C in the Table), than the S&P 500 Index (see the ETF SPY at Line 32 in the Table). Only 7 of the 22 have less price volatility than the S&P 500 Index (see Column M): KO, PEP, IBM, MO, UPS, NEE, TGT. If you’re not a gambler, stick to investing in those and the benchmark ETFs (SPY and VYM).
Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into MSFT, JPM, KO and NEE, and also own shares of PFE, CSCO, PEP, IBM, MMM, MO, AMGN, TXN, CAT and TGT.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, February 25
Week 347 - The Gretzky Rule Applied to Dividend Achievers in the Food Sector
Situation: Business people seeking to predict outcomes often quote Wayne Gretzky quote: “I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been.” This highlights a problem: All of the metrics and technical charts that we use are retrospective. We’re driving forward by looking in the rear view mirror! Warren Buffett has tried to estimate outcomes by making calculations of the growth in “core earnings’ in companies that have a “Durable Competitive Advantage”. DCA companies have had a growth rate for Tangible Book Value over the most recent 10 years that exceeds 7%/yr, with no more than three down years. (c.f. The Warren Buffett Stock Portfolio, Scribner, NY, 2011 by Mary Buffett and David Clark) You can read more about such estimates of “true” Shareholder Equity by Googling Net Tangible Asset Investing.
We agree with Mr. Buffett, and have learned to envision the future prospects of a company by first assessing its ability to grow Tangible Book Value. But since the Great Recession, few S&P 500 companies have even a dollar of Net Tangible Assets. Why? Because the Federal Reserve’s policy (to accelerate recovery from the Great Recession) has been to make money more freely available than ever before. Accordingly, companies favor debt financing over equity financing. Debt becomes a larger dollar amount on the Balance Sheet than equity. (Equity for most companies represents the initial cost of property, plant and equipment, which equals Tangible Book Value.)
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to arrive at an estimate of a company’s position in its sector of the economy 10 years from now. Start by analyzing S&P 500 companies in the Food, Beverage and Restaurant sector that are Dividend Achievers, i.e., have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: For almost any business, the name of the game for making money is not losing money. If a stock falls 50% in price, that price must rise 200% just to get back to where it started. So, let’s start our analysis by excluding Dividend Achievers that have a 16 year record of price appreciation showing volatility which exceeds that for the S&P 500 Index (see Column M in the Table). Then, we’ll look for companies having a clean Balance Sheet (Columns P-S in the Table) and a strong Global Brand (Columns AC-AD in the Table). None of the 11 companies have a clean Balance Sheet, but Coca-Cola (KO), Costco Wholesale (COST), Target (TGT), and Walmart (WMT) come close. Those four are also the only companies that have any Tangible Book Value (see Column R in the Table) but none have grown TBV fast enough to meet Warren Buffett’s requirements for DCA (see Column AF in the Table), although Walmart (WMT) comes close. Those 4 companies are also among the 7 that have a strong Global Brand.
Bottom Line: Walmart (WMT) is the winner of this contest.
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10). As a group, these 11 companies had remarkably buoyant total returns during the recent commodity recession (see Column D in the Table), which saw a 24.2%/yr drop in commodity prices (see Line 21 in the Table). Of course, raw food commodities were less expensive during that period but the outperformance of the food sector is strong enough to suggest that investors tend to move money there in deflationary times.
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into Coca-Cola (KO), and also own shares of Costco Wholesale (COST), Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), McCormick (MKC) and McDonald’s (MCD).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
We agree with Mr. Buffett, and have learned to envision the future prospects of a company by first assessing its ability to grow Tangible Book Value. But since the Great Recession, few S&P 500 companies have even a dollar of Net Tangible Assets. Why? Because the Federal Reserve’s policy (to accelerate recovery from the Great Recession) has been to make money more freely available than ever before. Accordingly, companies favor debt financing over equity financing. Debt becomes a larger dollar amount on the Balance Sheet than equity. (Equity for most companies represents the initial cost of property, plant and equipment, which equals Tangible Book Value.)
Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to arrive at an estimate of a company’s position in its sector of the economy 10 years from now. Start by analyzing S&P 500 companies in the Food, Beverage and Restaurant sector that are Dividend Achievers, i.e., have increased their dividend annually for at least the past 10 years.
Execution: see Table.
Administration: For almost any business, the name of the game for making money is not losing money. If a stock falls 50% in price, that price must rise 200% just to get back to where it started. So, let’s start our analysis by excluding Dividend Achievers that have a 16 year record of price appreciation showing volatility which exceeds that for the S&P 500 Index (see Column M in the Table). Then, we’ll look for companies having a clean Balance Sheet (Columns P-S in the Table) and a strong Global Brand (Columns AC-AD in the Table). None of the 11 companies have a clean Balance Sheet, but Coca-Cola (KO), Costco Wholesale (COST), Target (TGT), and Walmart (WMT) come close. Those four are also the only companies that have any Tangible Book Value (see Column R in the Table) but none have grown TBV fast enough to meet Warren Buffett’s requirements for DCA (see Column AF in the Table), although Walmart (WMT) comes close. Those 4 companies are also among the 7 that have a strong Global Brand.
Bottom Line: Walmart (WMT) is the winner of this contest.
Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10). As a group, these 11 companies had remarkably buoyant total returns during the recent commodity recession (see Column D in the Table), which saw a 24.2%/yr drop in commodity prices (see Line 21 in the Table). Of course, raw food commodities were less expensive during that period but the outperformance of the food sector is strong enough to suggest that investors tend to move money there in deflationary times.
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into Coca-Cola (KO), and also own shares of Costco Wholesale (COST), Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), McCormick (MKC) and McDonald’s (MCD).
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Sunday, December 3
Week 335 - Invest in “The 2 and 8 Club” Without Gambling
Situation: You’d like to invest in stocks without leaving money on the table. The alternative is to invest in the S&P 500 Index, which is a derivative subject to the kind of Program Trading that caused the “Black Monday” crash on October 19, 1987. Even after 3 decades of refining New York Stock Exchange technology to apply lessons learned from that crash, its recurrence remains a distinct possibility.
You can invest in stocks without getting swept up in full fury of the next crash by using a few precautions: 1) Avoid stocks that have a statistical likelihood of losing more money than the S&P 500 Index per the BMW Method, i.e., avoid stocks highlighted in red at Column M in our Tables. 2) Use dollar-cost averaging to invest through a Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP) in stocks that aren’t highlighted in red, and continue automatically investing in those each month throughout the next crash. 3) Avoid non-mortgage debt and have at least 25% of your assets in Savings Bonds, 2-10 Year US Treasury Notes, cash and cash equivalents.
Mission: Looking at the 30 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 329), set up a spreadsheet of those that do not have red highlights in Column M.
Execution: There are 12 such stocks (see Table).
Administration: Note that Costco Wholesale (COST) is not listed in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index upon which “The 2 and 8 Club” is based. While dividend growth rate is 13.0%/yr, its dividend yield is only 1.3%, which is much lower than the ~2%/yr required for inclusion in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. This overlooks the fact that Costco Wholesale issues special dividends of $5 or more every other year! So, I’ve chosen to make COST an honorary member of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
Bottom Line: You do have a chance of beating the S&P 500 Index without gambling, by investing in high quality growth stocks that are unlikely to lose as much as that index in the next market crash. But we find only 12 such stocks, which means you’d need to invest in all 12 to avoid selection bias.
Risk Rating is 5, where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10.
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into IBM, KO, XOM and NEE, and also own shares of MO and TRV.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
You can invest in stocks without getting swept up in full fury of the next crash by using a few precautions: 1) Avoid stocks that have a statistical likelihood of losing more money than the S&P 500 Index per the BMW Method, i.e., avoid stocks highlighted in red at Column M in our Tables. 2) Use dollar-cost averaging to invest through a Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP) in stocks that aren’t highlighted in red, and continue automatically investing in those each month throughout the next crash. 3) Avoid non-mortgage debt and have at least 25% of your assets in Savings Bonds, 2-10 Year US Treasury Notes, cash and cash equivalents.
Mission: Looking at the 30 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 329), set up a spreadsheet of those that do not have red highlights in Column M.
Execution: There are 12 such stocks (see Table).
Administration: Note that Costco Wholesale (COST) is not listed in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index upon which “The 2 and 8 Club” is based. While dividend growth rate is 13.0%/yr, its dividend yield is only 1.3%, which is much lower than the ~2%/yr required for inclusion in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. This overlooks the fact that Costco Wholesale issues special dividends of $5 or more every other year! So, I’ve chosen to make COST an honorary member of “The 2 and 8 Club.”
Bottom Line: You do have a chance of beating the S&P 500 Index without gambling, by investing in high quality growth stocks that are unlikely to lose as much as that index in the next market crash. But we find only 12 such stocks, which means you’d need to invest in all 12 to avoid selection bias.
Risk Rating is 5, where 10-Yr Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10.
Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into IBM, KO, XOM and NEE, and also own shares of MO and TRV.
"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com
Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)