Month 110 - Buy Low! 12 A-rated Haven Stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced - August 2020

Situation: There’s no mystery to saving for retirement. A good working game plan is to divert 15-20% of your monthly income to the purchase of stocks and government bonds, and then keep those assets in a 60:40 balance of stocks:bonds. You can also use any bond substitutes (e.g. gold, T-bills, and utility stock ETFs) that typically hold their value in a stock market crash. Mainly use stock index ETFs for your retirement savings but also buy stock in companies that tend to have an above-market dividend yield. Those “shareholder-friendly payouts” happen because the company has good collateral: Liabilities are protected by Tangible Book Value and a cushion of Cash Equivalents. In other words, avoid stocks issued by companies that have become over-indebted. 

Think of the bonds in your portfolio as the collateral that backs your stocks. So, a good way to start saving for retirement is to over-emphasize collateral-thinking: Dollar-average into the low-cost Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX), which is 60% bonds and 40% stocks picked from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF (VYM). VWINX has lost money in only 7 of the past 50 years, those losses always being less than 10%. Since its inception on 7/1/1970, VWINX has returned 9.7%/yr vs. 10.8%/yr for the S&P 500 Index with dividends reinvested.

The harder task is to stop putting additional money into stocks that have become overpriced. To do that you have to know how to calculate the Graham Number. Benjamin Graham wrote the first edition of The Intelligent Investor almost 100 years ago. It is hard to read because he uses numbers to express almost every pearl of knowledge. The “Graham Number” is simply the rational market price for any stock at any given moment, calculated as the square root of: 15 times earnings for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) multiplied by 1.5 times Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) multiplied by 22.5 (i.e., 1.5 times 15). So, the Graham Number is nothing more than what the stock’s price would be if it were to reflect a P/E of 15 and a Book Value of 1.5.  The purpose of doing this calculation on your stocks is to know their underlying worth. Benjamin Graham also explained why the 7-year P/E should not exceed 25, assuming that a single year’s P/E (TTM) should not exceed 20, which is an earnings yield of 5%/yr: In a normal inflationary environment, a company’s earnings are likely to grow 3% to 3.5% per year. After 7 years, a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 3.2%/yr takes a P/E of 20 to 25.

My definition of an Overpriced Stock is one that a) has a market price (50-day Moving Average) that is more than 2.5 times the Graham Number and b) has a 7-year P/E that is more than 30. Looking at the 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I see that 5 A-rated stocks are overpriced (see Column AC-AH in Comparisons section of Table):

     Microsoft (MSFT), 

     Apple (AAPL), 

     Nike (NKE), 

     Coca-Cola (KO) and 

     Procter & Gamble (PG). 

Stocks get overpriced because they become popular with investors, leading to a Crowded Trade. Assuming that your goal is to Buy Low, why would you continue to add money to any of these 5 stocks that you already own? You would only do so because you harbor a Positive Sentiment regarding their future prospects, In other words, you would be making a speculative investment (“gambling”). To avoid gambling and instead employ a “risk-off” approach to buying individual stocks, you’ll need clear definitions for A-rated stocks and for Haven stocks to supplement the numbers-based system used above to avoid Overpriced stocks. You’ll also want to favor stocks issued by large companies, since those typically have multiple product lines and unencumbered lines of credit.

Mission: Define “A-rated stocks” and “Haven stocks”. Analyze A-rated Haven stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced by using our Standard Spreadsheet.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: A-rated stocks are those that have a) an above market dividend yield (see portfolio of Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF - VYM), b) positive Book Value, c) positive earnings (TTM), d) an S&P rating on the company’s bonds that is A- or better, e) an S&P rating on the company’s stock that is B+/M or better, and f) a 20+ year trading history. 

Haven Stocks are A-rated stocks issued by companies that aren’t encumbered with risk factors that are likely to threaten the company’s solvency during a recession. So, companies in the Real Estate Industry (i.e., REITs) and companies in the Financial Services Industry (i.e., banks) are excluded, as are companies with negative Tangible Book Value if Total Debt is more than 2.5 times EBITDA (TTM) or Total Debt is more than 2.0 times Shareholder Equity. 

Bottom Line: With the S&P 500 Index being priced at 29 times TTM earnings (see SPY at Line 28 and Column K in the Table), the stock market is overpriced relative to its long-term P/E of 15-16. But its 50-day Moving Average price is still less than 2.5 times its Graham Number (i.e., 2.1), and its 7-yr P/E is still less than 30 (i.e., 28), per Columns AC and AE at Line 28 in the Table. Using our example of the DJIA, the timely thing to do would be to avoid buying more shares of the overpriced A-rated stocks (MSFT, NKE, PG, KO, AAPL) but to continue buying more shares of SPY. This strategy allows you to retain exposure to volatility in stocks that are Overpriced (because of their future prospects) while using diversification to reduce your risk of serious loss.

Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, INTC, WMT, JNJ, CAT, and also own shares of MRK, CSCO, TGT, DUK, SO, MMM. From late February through April 2020, I added shares of 6 new companies to my brokerage account--Comcast (CMCSA), Costco Wholesale (COST), Home Depot (HD), Merck (MRK), Disney (DIS) and Target (TGT), while selling shares of Norfolk Southern (NSC) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Regarding the 5 overpriced but A-rated stocks in the DJIA, I’ve stopped dollar-averaging into KO but continue to dollar-average into MSFT, NKE and PG because I expect those companies to continue to dominate their competitors. I have no plans to sell the shares of KO and AAPL that I already own.

The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 390 - REITs That Qualify For "The 2 and 8 Club"

Situation: Membership in “The 2 and 8 Club” is based on the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which consists of the ~400 companies in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index that reliably pay an above-market dividend. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are excluded from the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index because their dividend payouts are variable, being fixed by law at 95% of gross income. But those payouts are usually higher than the yield on an S&P 500 ETF (e.g. SPY), which is ~2%. We are curious as to whether any REITs meet the 5 basic requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and find that there are 4 (see Table). However, REITs are typically “small cap stocks.” Only one of the four in our Table is a large enough company to be included in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index (Simon Property Group; SPG).

Mission: Populate our Standard Spreadsheet for REITs. Select only those that meet the 5 basic requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”:
   1) above-market dividend yield;
   2) 5-Yr dividend growth of at least 8.0%/yr;
   3) a 16+ year trading record that is analyzed weekly for quantitative metrics by the BMW Method;
   4) an S&P Bond Rating of BBB+ or higher;
   5) an S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or higher.
Add a column for FFO (Funds From Operations; see Column P in the Table), which is a ratio that the REIT Industry substitutes for P/E. 

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: Pricing for REITs is negatively correlated with rising interest rates but not as much as you might suspect. This is likely because the dividend yield for most REITs remains above the interest rate on a 10-Yr US Treasury Note. Pricing is more sensitive to the likelihood that the REIT will have enough FCF (Free Cash Flow) to fund dividend payouts (see Column R in the Table). Overall, it is hard to argue against the idea that high-quality REITs are a good “bond substitute.” 

Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into SPG and own shares of KIM.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 338 - Alternative Investments (REITs, Pipelines, Copper, Silver and Gold)

Situation: You want to minimize losses from the next stock market crash. News Flash: The safe and effective way to do that is to have 50% of your assets in medium-term investment-grade bonds. Those will go up 10-25% whenever stocks swoon. But a plain vanilla form of protection won’t resonate with your neighbors after the crash hits. You’ll want to tell them about something cool that you did to protect yourself. And, while waiting for the next crash you don’t like the low interest income that you’d receive from a low-cost Vanguard intermediate-term investment-grade bond index fund like VBIIX or BIV. The exotic-seeming alternative is to bet on something related to land and its uses. Those bets carry valuations that track long supercycles, which overlap 3 or 4 economic cycles. But supercycles contain pitfalls for the unwary, and even for professional commodity traders.

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to examine Alternative Investments, and describe the pros and cons of owning those.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: The main bets are on real estate, oil/gas pipelines, copper, silver and gold. Traders mitigate losses during a recession by hoarding such assets until prices recover. Let’s look at the odds of success. The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) is responsible for guiding the average investor away from loss-making bets. For example, the SEC doesn’t allow a stock to be listed on a public exchange unless it has Tangible Book Value (TBV) and appears likely to continue having TBV after being listed. So, S&P identifies 10 Industries that have the structural profitability needed to maintain TBV and dividend payouts for retail investors. 

Real Estate is not such an industry. However, S&P has started evaluating Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) with a view toward someday including those. However, the Financial Times of London does not include Real Estate companies in either its FTSE Global High Dividend Yield Index, or the US version of that index, which you can invest in at low cost through an ETF marketed by the Vanguard Group (VYM). Nonetheless, we’ll list what we think are the 7 best REITs in the accompanying Table.

Oil and gas pipelines offer a way to capture tax-advantaged dividend income that transcends the ups and downs of the economy, but typically requires you to buy into a Limited Partnership. To do so, the SEC requires you to be an Accredited Investor. “To be an accredited investor, a person must demonstrate an annual income of $200,000, or $300,000 for joint income, for the last two years with expectation of earning the same or higher income.” You’re also liable for taxes levied by most states through which the pipelines run. As a retail investor, you aren’t going to buy shares of a Limited Partnership. So, none are listed in our Table. But a few “midstream” oil & gas companies issue common stock to help fund a large network of integrated pipelines. Those pay the same high dividends expected of Limited Partnerships, and two companies are listed in the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index for US companies (VYM): ONEOK (OKE) and Williams (WMB). This indicates that each company’s dividend policy is thought to be sustainable. ONEOK has the additional distinction of being an S&P Dividend Achiever because of 10+ years of annual dividend increases.

Gold is the traditional Alternative Investment, which also brings copper and silver into play given that all 3 are found in the same geological formations. Any copper mine that fails to process the small amounts of gold it unearths is a copper mine not worth owning. The same can be said of gold miners who ignore silver deposits. The problem for investors is that mines are costly to develop and have an unknown shelf life. So, owning common stocks issued by miners has fallen out of favor: Dividends are rare and fleeting, and long-term price appreciation is neither substantial nor steady. Nonetheless, we have listed 4 miners in the Table: Freeport McMoRan (FCX) and Southern Copper (SCCO) both focus on mining copper; Newmont Mining (NEM, focused on mining gold), and Pan American Silver (PAAS). 

A better way to invest in precious metals is to buy stock in financial companies based on loaning money to miners on condition of being paid later either in royalties or ownership of a stream of product, should the mine become a successful enterprise. We have listed two such companies: Royal Gold (RGLD), which seeks royalties; Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), which mainly seeks silver streaming contracts. See our Week 307 blog for a detailed discussion of silver. 

Bottom Line: If you want to venture into Alternative Investments, and would like to take a relatively safe and effective approach, we suggest that you buy shares in the REIT ETF marketed by the Vanguard Group (VNQ at Line 19 in the Table). Better yet, stick to companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” that represent more reasonable bets in the Natural Resources space: ExxonMobil (XOM), Caterpillar (CAT), and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM). One pipeline company is also worth your consideration: ONEOK (OKE, see comments above). 

Risk Rating: 9 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-cost average into XOM, and also own shares of OKE, CAT and WPM.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 289 - Don't Leave Federal "Tax Expenditures" On The Table

Situation: There are 5 Federal government programs that can reduce your cost of living in retirement. You need to learn about these and take advantage of them whenever you are likely to benefit.

Program #1: The Social Security Act of 1935: You need to decide when to retire, because each year you delay results in an 8% larger Social Security check. You also need to brush up on other aspects of The Social Security Act that apply to you or your family. If you and your husband are divorced, and you’ve never remarried, you may still be eligible for some additional benefits. Check out the SSA website for answers to questions, and visit your nearest SSA office to get the help that you might need. 

Program #2: Social Security Act Amendments of 1965 (Medicare): When you enroll in Medicare at age 65, you’ll have the option of taking out private “MediGap” insurance, which is supervised by your state government, or enrolling in Part C, which is a private “Medicare Advantage” plan that is a Federally-managed and “capped” supplement encompassing Parts A and B of Medicare. 

Program #3: The Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 provides insurance for FHA Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM), known as “reverse mortgages”. More than 3/4ths of the average retirees’ net worth is tied up in home equity, with other sources averaging ~$45,000 for Americans in the 65 to 69 year age group. By following the 4% Rule, the average American can only spend $150/mo of that “nest egg” to supplement her income from Social Security. To keep up with the myriad expenses of home ownership, she’ll have to decide whether to get a part-time job, sell her house, rent out part of it, or enter into a reverse mortgage. “Reverse mortgages are increasing in popularity with seniors who have equity in their homes and want to supplement their income. The only reverse mortgage insured by the U.S. Federal Government is called a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM, and is only available through an FHA approved lender.” But there is evidence that the average American is preparing better for retirement: As of 2015, those between the ages of 55 and 64 had saved an average of $104,000 according to the Government Accountability Office, which means $217/mo could be spent without eliminating that nest egg.

Program #4: The Cigar Excise Tax Extension Act of 1960 provides the legal framework for Real Estate Investment Trusts or REITs. This law does not create a tax expenditure (subsidy). Instead, it raises more revenue by creating an incentive for investors to move their money into real estate. That indirectly helps to reduce your cost of living at an extended care facility, when you can no longer live independently. Unless you are well off, you won’t be able to afford private long-term care insurance, and Federally subsidized long-term care insurance is only available to retired Federal employees. REITs are a partial solution, because they free real estate companies from paying Federal taxes, leaving investors with the obligation to pay that tax. REITs are similar to mutual funds except that they’re required to pay at least 90% of their income to investors, as dividends. Those dividends are attractive enough that REITs now have a large following among investors. Many “nursing homes” and extended care facilities are REITs. Retirees benefit from the capitalization structure of healthcare REITs, but investors who can tolerate a “roller-coaster ride” also come out ahead.

Program #5: The Food Stamp Act of 1964: Your next decision is whether or not to apply for food stamps. If you have no other source of income than Social Security, you are definitely eligible.

Mission: Set up a spreadsheet of ways an investor might invest in some of the public-private partnerships listed above, including health insurance companies that offer MediGap and Medicare Advantage plans. Pay particular attention to healthcare REITs.

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: Once you retire, your annual income will not keep up with inflation. With each passing year, you’ll become a little more watchful of spending and a little more likely to search out discounts. You’ll start to inquire about Federal programs that are particularly helpful to retirees, e.g. Food Stamps. We’ve listed 5 Federal programs that benefit retirees; you should become conversant in these before you retire. We have also listed 6 companies in the Table; 3 are healthcare REITs and 3 are large insurance companies with MediGap or Medicare Advantage plans. All 6 are high-risk high-reward businesses. 

Risk Rating: 7 (where US Treasuries = 10, the S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I don’t own shares in any of the 6 companies listed in the Table, but am looking to buy shares in the only “blue chip” (Dow Jones Industrial Average company): UnitedHealth Group (UNH).


Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 90 - Pipelines

Situation: Pipelines are another sector of critical infrastructure that the government "builds out" by making tax expenditures. In order to tempt investors into funding the massive up-front costs of laying a new pipeline, the IRS offers these “tax breaks” as an incentive. Pipeline operators get direct support from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the form of a letter stating that no corporate taxes need be paid as long as at least 85% of any profits are returned to shareholders--who also get a tax break (see below). The pipeline company, which is structured as a Limited Partnership that receives initial funding from a General Partner, has to issue bonds if it wants to further expand its pipeline network. Those bonds aren't backed by the government. That's the catch. All of the pipeline companies have to expand their networks (given the ever-growing demand) but also have to maintain an investment-grade rating on their bonds to obtain low-cost financing. They all "push the edge of the envelope" and issue as much debt as the 3 rating agencies (S&P, Moody's, and Fitch) will allow before the rating is dropped to "junk" status. If you’re still reading, you’ve probably figured out that a pipeline company is set up much like a real estate investment trust (REIT).

The fixed costs of a pipeline can be depreciated in 20 yrs even though the pipeline itself has a much longer life. That means “distributions” (i.e., each investor’s share of operating profits minus interest, capital expenditures and payments to the General Partner) are mostly tax-deferred. Investors receive a K-1 tax form each year noting that taxes owed on their share of the return on invested capital (ROIC) are only about 20%. The remaining 80% represents non-taxable depreciation which reduces the investor’s cost basis to zero over time. After that point, distributions are taxed at the going rate for capital gains. When the stock is sold, any gain that is realized (because of price appreciation) is taxed as income. Considering the unusual structure of this investment, it is a great way for you to grow your wealth. Granted, there are tax headaches, e.g. some pipeline routes cross states that require a tax form to be filed.

The current energy boom that has been touched off by “hydrofracking” and horizontal drilling has ignited ~$10 Billion/yr of investment in pipelines that will continue for ~25 yrs. Once a pipeline is built, the fees charged for transporting oil and gas are relatively inelastic, i.e., changes in the price of natural gas or oil have little influence on pricing.
The Table lists 10 Limited Partnerships that represent the spectrum of over 70 such companies. In the past, total returns (distribution rate + rate of growth in the distribution rate) have averaged 13-14%/yr. The Table calls those distributions “dividends” because that is how most investors think of them. But if you’ve read this far, you know that distributions are quite different from dividends. Just remember this: payouts are high and grow smoothly but price appreciation is slow and bumpy. You’ll build your after-tax wealth from the quarterly distributions, not from selling the stock (when you’ll have to pay full income tax on any profits). You’ll need a good accountant to do your taxes.

Bottom Line: Do you want to make real money (after inflation, transaction costs and taxes)? Then look at investing in MLPs (Master Limited Partnerships). Those are mainly pipeline companies that have great economics once the pipeline is built and long-term contracts are in place. There are two main problems you run into: 1) Your accountant will have to file more tax forms; 2) These companies carry a lot of debt and that debt is rated just one or two notches above junk. So you’ll have to do some digging and find companies that have good management. Then keep track of the company’s business plans. We think Kinder Morgan Enterprise Partners (KMP) has exemplary management, and S&P gives Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) an A-rating (the others haven’t yet been assigned a rating).

Risk Rating: 8.

Full Disclosure: I have no stock in an MLP but do have stock in one of the General Partners: Kinder Morgan (KMI).

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 1 - An Introduction to Our Blog

Who benefits from reading our ITR blog every week?

That would be the recently burned, casual investor - let's say a career woman who thought of herself as being risk averse (until the recent crash). She doesn't hold an MBA or work in a bank but does find investing to be a fascinating and useful hobby. She expects an asset will pay her rental income, interest, or a dividend, so she cannot be called a speculator. She may have owned a capital appreciation stock mutual fund but probably learned her lesson in the recent downturn. You would find her in a casino only to use the bathroom, or have a meal washed down with iced tea, and on a brokerage office Risk Questionnaire, she will score as a solid "growth & income investor". Her investment style is probably "capital preservation", where her main strategy is to protect her core investment monies.

The ITR target investor is one who finds the information provided about stock mutual funds to be inadequate. While bond mutual funds describe investment style in terms of both the credit risk and average time to maturity (risk of loss in value of long-term bonds due to inflation), similar information can be difficult to ascertain with stock mutual funds. Even when a company issues bonds, as most do, it is difficult to access that information. This is probably because many companies issue bonds that carry high credit risk and have long maturation periods. Standard & Poor's (S&P) rates each company's common stock and bond portfolio but that information is not required in a stock mutual fund prospectus. Managers of stock mutual funds like to invest in riskier stocks because in a “bull market” those stocks make the fund perform better than the relevant benchmark index. This is good for advertising because it suggests that the fund manager is a brilliant stock picker. But such is not the case: in a “bear market”, losses will be greater than for the benchmark. This is why the large majority of stock mutual funds lost more in 2008 than the standard benchmark – the S&P 500 Index, which lost a whopping 37%. And that 37% loss is just too great for our ITR reader. Having been burned, she will now shy away from stock mutual funds and wants to learn to invest directly in company stocks on her own.

This is best achieved by using a company's Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP). Using a DRIP keeps trading costs low (you don't pay fees to a broker) and allows you to capture the power of compound interest through automatic re-investment of dividends. A monthly electronic purchase plan results in “dollar-cost averaging”, giving a certainty of buying cheaply during market down-turns. This type of an investment strategy lets our ITR investor develop a portfolio of 5-10 stocks with dividend re-investment, just as a bond mutual fund manager reinvests interest payments.

Now the problem for our investor becomes one of concentration: holding fewer than 50 stocks in a portfolio exposes the portfolio to market risk. There are two things that offer protection. One is to confine purchases to stocks that carry S&P Quality Ratings of A- or above, and the second is to choose only those companies that have increased dividends annually for at least 10 years. Stock in dividend-paying companies has been shown to hold up better in market downturns, thus some "insurance" is obtained by choosing stocks that yield more than an S&P 500 Index Fund (an example is SPY, an exchange-traded fund; current yield 1.8%).

Stock market risk can also be reduced (or hedged) using two other tools: diversification of holdings across industries, and by investing in other markets: foreign stocks, bonds (both US and foreign), rental properties and commodities markets. Problems arise though: commodity futures contracts pay no interest or dividends, and charges are steep, making these instruments suitable only for short-term investing by expert traders. Rental properties also carry significant charges. Unless one owns a Class A apartment building in a growing town, rental income isn't going to help in a stock market crash because occupancy will likely fall. Risks from owning a single apartment building can be diffused by owning a real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in a number of Class A apartment buildings in different regions of the country, but value will still fall in a difficult economy. Thus, REITs are not a useful asset for someone who emphasizes capital preservation.

Let's take a closer look at companies that produce, package, transport, and market commodities. Some of these have S&P Quality Ratings of A- or better, yield as much or more than SPY, and have increased that payout annually for at least 10 years. (Whoa! Now our investor is tuned in . . .) These companies have found a way to develop raw commodities and consistently produce reliable streams of cash flow for reinvestment (after dividends are paid to stockholders and interest to bondholders). The major traditional commodities with a regulated "futures" market include corn, soybeans, wheat, live cattle, lean hogs, cocoa, coffee, sugar, gold, silver, copper, crude oil, heating oil and natural gas. There are 6 companies meeting our criteria that manage these feedstocks as their primary line of business. A future blog will identify and discuss these companies. All 6 had a 10-year total return of at least 7.7%/year, whereas, the median total return of a Fortune 500 company over that period was 6.7%/year (Fortune Magazine, May 23, 201, volume 163, no. 7, pp F2-F32) and the total return for the S&P 500 Index was 1.3%/year (moneychimp.com). However, commodity producers like these 6 companies suffer during stock market pull-backs, such as the one we've just experienced. A future ITR blog will discuss how to manage this risk.

Commodity markets are priced in dollars and globally sourced, which is the main support for their investment value. Therefore investments that are tied to a commodity represent a hedge against dollar depreciation. For that reason alone, it is worthwhile to buy stock in companies that can pass changes in valuation along to end-users. Future installments of our blog will address other key inputs to the economy that behave similarly, such as electricity.

Bottom Line:  Our weekly ITR blog will provide you with tools that allow you to become your own fund manager. We know it’s a complicated undertaking and difficult for new investors to feel comfortable with these concepts. Each week we will post our take on the topics we’ve introduced to you and provide further analysis and tools for you to use in managing your portfolio.


Click this link to move to Week 2