Month 110 - Buy Low! 12 A-rated Haven Stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced - August 2020

Situation: There’s no mystery to saving for retirement. A good working game plan is to divert 15-20% of your monthly income to the purchase of stocks and government bonds, and then keep those assets in a 60:40 balance of stocks:bonds. You can also use any bond substitutes (e.g. gold, T-bills, and utility stock ETFs) that typically hold their value in a stock market crash. Mainly use stock index ETFs for your retirement savings but also buy stock in companies that tend to have an above-market dividend yield. Those “shareholder-friendly payouts” happen because the company has good collateral: Liabilities are protected by Tangible Book Value and a cushion of Cash Equivalents. In other words, avoid stocks issued by companies that have become over-indebted. 

Think of the bonds in your portfolio as the collateral that backs your stocks. So, a good way to start saving for retirement is to over-emphasize collateral-thinking: Dollar-average into the low-cost Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX), which is 60% bonds and 40% stocks picked from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF (VYM). VWINX has lost money in only 7 of the past 50 years, those losses always being less than 10%. Since its inception on 7/1/1970, VWINX has returned 9.7%/yr vs. 10.8%/yr for the S&P 500 Index with dividends reinvested.

The harder task is to stop putting additional money into stocks that have become overpriced. To do that you have to know how to calculate the Graham Number. Benjamin Graham wrote the first edition of The Intelligent Investor almost 100 years ago. It is hard to read because he uses numbers to express almost every pearl of knowledge. The “Graham Number” is simply the rational market price for any stock at any given moment, calculated as the square root of: 15 times earnings for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) multiplied by 1.5 times Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) multiplied by 22.5 (i.e., 1.5 times 15). So, the Graham Number is nothing more than what the stock’s price would be if it were to reflect a P/E of 15 and a Book Value of 1.5.  The purpose of doing this calculation on your stocks is to know their underlying worth. Benjamin Graham also explained why the 7-year P/E should not exceed 25, assuming that a single year’s P/E (TTM) should not exceed 20, which is an earnings yield of 5%/yr: In a normal inflationary environment, a company’s earnings are likely to grow 3% to 3.5% per year. After 7 years, a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 3.2%/yr takes a P/E of 20 to 25.

My definition of an Overpriced Stock is one that a) has a market price (50-day Moving Average) that is more than 2.5 times the Graham Number and b) has a 7-year P/E that is more than 30. Looking at the 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I see that 5 A-rated stocks are overpriced (see Column AC-AH in Comparisons section of Table):

     Microsoft (MSFT), 

     Apple (AAPL), 

     Nike (NKE), 

     Coca-Cola (KO) and 

     Procter & Gamble (PG). 

Stocks get overpriced because they become popular with investors, leading to a Crowded Trade. Assuming that your goal is to Buy Low, why would you continue to add money to any of these 5 stocks that you already own? You would only do so because you harbor a Positive Sentiment regarding their future prospects, In other words, you would be making a speculative investment (“gambling”). To avoid gambling and instead employ a “risk-off” approach to buying individual stocks, you’ll need clear definitions for A-rated stocks and for Haven stocks to supplement the numbers-based system used above to avoid Overpriced stocks. You’ll also want to favor stocks issued by large companies, since those typically have multiple product lines and unencumbered lines of credit.

Mission: Define “A-rated stocks” and “Haven stocks”. Analyze A-rated Haven stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced by using our Standard Spreadsheet.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: A-rated stocks are those that have a) an above market dividend yield (see portfolio of Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF - VYM), b) positive Book Value, c) positive earnings (TTM), d) an S&P rating on the company’s bonds that is A- or better, e) an S&P rating on the company’s stock that is B+/M or better, and f) a 20+ year trading history. 

Haven Stocks are A-rated stocks issued by companies that aren’t encumbered with risk factors that are likely to threaten the company’s solvency during a recession. So, companies in the Real Estate Industry (i.e., REITs) and companies in the Financial Services Industry (i.e., banks) are excluded, as are companies with negative Tangible Book Value if Total Debt is more than 2.5 times EBITDA (TTM) or Total Debt is more than 2.0 times Shareholder Equity. 

Bottom Line: With the S&P 500 Index being priced at 29 times TTM earnings (see SPY at Line 28 and Column K in the Table), the stock market is overpriced relative to its long-term P/E of 15-16. But its 50-day Moving Average price is still less than 2.5 times its Graham Number (i.e., 2.1), and its 7-yr P/E is still less than 30 (i.e., 28), per Columns AC and AE at Line 28 in the Table. Using our example of the DJIA, the timely thing to do would be to avoid buying more shares of the overpriced A-rated stocks (MSFT, NKE, PG, KO, AAPL) but to continue buying more shares of SPY. This strategy allows you to retain exposure to volatility in stocks that are Overpriced (because of their future prospects) while using diversification to reduce your risk of serious loss.

Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, INTC, WMT, JNJ, CAT, and also own shares of MRK, CSCO, TGT, DUK, SO, MMM. From late February through April 2020, I added shares of 6 new companies to my brokerage account--Comcast (CMCSA), Costco Wholesale (COST), Home Depot (HD), Merck (MRK), Disney (DIS) and Target (TGT), while selling shares of Norfolk Southern (NSC) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Regarding the 5 overpriced but A-rated stocks in the DJIA, I’ve stopped dollar-averaging into KO but continue to dollar-average into MSFT, NKE and PG because I expect those companies to continue to dominate their competitors. I have no plans to sell the shares of KO and AAPL that I already own.

The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Month 101 - Moving the Needle: A-rated S&P 100 Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” - November 2019

Situation: You’re now in your 50s. The “sunset years” loom ahead. While you have the advantage of being a more experienced investor, you’re losing time and may retire short of where you need to be. Even now, you need to have a “nest egg” at least 6 times your current salary. Your retirement account is likely to be 60% in stocks but that allocation falls to 50% by the time you retire. You’ll need to hold safer but more effective stocks. “The 2 and 8 Club” is one way to do that: buy stocks that carry both a higher dividend yield and a faster rate of dividend growth compared to the S&P 500 Index (SPY), i.e., stocks that yield at least 2%/yr and grow dividends at least 8%/yr. For safety, confine your picks to stocks issued by “mega-cap” companies in the S&P 100 Index. Why those? Because they’re large enough to have multiple product lines, i.e., they’re more able to respond to diverse market conditions. And, they’re required to have active hedging positions at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. Those “put and call” stock options are side-bets made by professional traders, which makes “price discovery” for the underlying stocks more rational. 

Mission: Use our standard spreadsheet to analyze companies in the S&P 100 Index that a) issue debt rated at least A- by S&P, b) issue stock rated B+/M or better by S&P,  c) are listed in the U.S. version of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index--marketed by Vanguard Group as VYM, d) have the 16+ year trading record that is needed for quantitative analysis by the BMW Method, and e) have grown their dividend at least 8%/yr for the past 5 years. 

Execution: see the 13 companies at the top of this week’s Table.

Administration: Let’s explain the Basic Quality Screen (see Column AH in the Table). The idea is to give readers a quick take on which stocks are worthwhile to consider as a new BUY. The maximum score is 4. Overpriced stocks (see Column AF) are penalized half a point. Reading from left to right across the spreadsheet, the first opportunity to score a point is found in Column K. Stocks that have a 16-yr price appreciation that is more than 1/3rd the risk of ownership (Column M) score one point. A negative value in Column S for Tangible Book Value (highlighted in purple) results in a loss of one point if the debt load is either greater than 2.5 times EBITDA (Column R) or LT-debt represents more than 50% of the company’s total capitalization (Column Q). In Columns U and V, all 13 companies earn 2 points because their S&P ratings meet the requirement of being at least A- for the company’s debt and B+/M for the company’s stock. In Column Z, one point is earned if the stock appears likely to meet our Required Rate of Return over the next 10 years, which is 10%/yr, i.e., the dollar value is not highlighted in purple.

Bottom Line: As you approach retirement, look more closely at the stocks and ETFs in your portfolio. Those equities will need to be half your retirement savings. Where possible, choose stocks issued by large companies that offer higher dividend yields and faster dividend growth than the S&P 500 Index. Five of this week’s stocks are worth researching for possible purchase because of being rated 3 or 4 on our Basic Quality Screen (see Column AH): CSCO, JPM, USB, CAT and BLK.   

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JPM, USB, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of AMGN, CSCO, PEP, BLK and MMM.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Month 94 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Spring 2019 Update

Situation: Investors should pay attention to asset classes that fluctuate in value out-of-sync with the S&P 500 Index. Such asset classes are said to have minimal or negative “correlation” with large-capitalization US stocks. Emerging markets and raw commodities are important examples. Those are a natural pair, given that most countries in the emerging markets group have an economy that is based on the production of one or more raw commodities. 

The idea that you can find a safe haven for your savings, one which will allow you to ride out a crash in the US stock market, is a pleasant fiction. Articles in support of that idea are published almost daily. But unless you are a trader who can afford to rent or buy a $500,000 seat on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, you probably aren’t deft enough to arbitrage the various risks accurately enough before they develop (and at low enough transaction costs) to avoid losing money in a crash. 

If you really want to ride out most crashes, invest in a bond-heavy balanced mutual fund that is managed by real humans. The Vanguard Group offers one best, and it comes with very low transaction fees (Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund or VWINX). To refresh yourself on the competitive advantages of investing in food and agriculture companies, see our most recent blog on the subject (see Month 91). To refresh yourself on the competitive disadvantages, study this month’s Table and Bottom Line carefully.

The essential fact is that economies require money for spending and investment. That comes down to having consumers who are confident enough about their employment prospects and entrepreneurs who are confident enough about their ability to invest. Those consumers and entrepreneurs can be relied upon to transfer their successes to the larger economy by saving money, taking out loans, and paying taxes. National economies are interlinked. Because of the size and innovation of its marketplace, the US economy is the main enabler for most of the other national economies. Logic would suggest that the valuation for any asset class will roughly track the ups and downs of the S&P 500 Index, either as a first derivative or second derivative. 

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze US and Canadian food and agriculture companies that carry at least a BBB rating on their bonds (see Column R).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: Of the 25 companies listed in the Table, only one meets Warren Buffett’s criteria of low beta (see Column I), low volatility (Column M), high quality (Column S), strong balance sheet (Columns N-R), and TTM (Trailing Twelve Month) earnings plus mrq (most recent quarter) Book Values that yield a Graham Number which is not far from the stock’s current Price (Column Y). That company is Berkshire Hathaway. We use a Basic Quality Screen that is less stringent as his: 1) an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better (Column S), 2) an S&P bond rating of BBB+ or better (Column R), 3) 16-Yr price volatility (Column M) that is less than 3 times the rate of price appreciation (Column K), and 4) a positive dollar amount for net present value (Column W) when using a 10-Yr holding period in combination with a 10% discount rate (to reflect a 10% Required Rate of Return).

Bottom Line: Only 8 companies on the list pass our Basic Quality Screen (see Administration above): HRL, COST, PEP, KO, DE, FAST, CNI, UNP. At the opposite end of the spectrum, 9 companies have a below-market S&P bond rating of BBB. So, those stocks represent outright gambles. 

Aside from Berkshire Hathaway, none of the 25 companies can be said to issue a reasonably priced “value” stock. We’re dealing with 24 “growth” stocks, only a third of which are of high quality. Three of the 9 with BBB bond ratings have high total debt levels relative to EBITDA (see Column O in the Table) that are unprotected by Tangible Book Value (Column P): SJM, MKC, GIS. The good news is that only one of the 9 appears to be overpriced, and that company (MKC) is a quasi-monopoly that has little risk of bankruptcy because it has “cornered” the US spice market. 

In summary, you can do well by investing in this space as long as you understand that you’re dealing with a fragmented food industry, one that is flush with companies of dubious quality. You might like to be well-informed about these companies because food, like fuel, is an essential good, and the food industry enjoys steady growth. Why? Because the number of people in Asia & Africa who can afford to consume 50 grams of protein per day grows by tens of millions per year.

Risk Rating: ranges from 6 to 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO and UNP, and also own shares of AMZN, HRL, MO, MKC, BRK-B, CAT and WMT.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 385 - Let’s Dollar-Average Into 10 Stocks From The Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index

Situation: The advantage of dollar-cost averaging into specific stocks vs. dollar-averaging into the reference index is that you can focus on high-quality companies. However, those companies are less dynamic than early-movers. By investing in an index fund you’ll capture the effect that “earnings surprises” have on prices for early-movers. So, let’s compare a portfolio of 10 high quality stocks to the relevant index. Dollar-averaging identical amounts each month into either the index or each of the 10 stocks is just a way to buy more shares whenever the market is down. That way, I can assume that your returns will approximate the published total returns/Yr.

Mission: Pick 10 stocks from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index. Then run our Standard Spreadsheet.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: The 10 stocks I’ve picked happen to be the 10 that I dollar-average into.

Bottom Line: From the spreadsheet, I cannot discern a material difference in long-term returns from dollar-averaging in an index fund, such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) or the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM), compared to dollar-averaging into the 10 stocks I’ve picked. However, there is a material difference with respect to transaction costs: VYM has an expense ratio of 0.08%, whereas, the expense ratio for dollar-averaging into my 10 stocks is ~1.2%.

Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 380 - Are Stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” Overpriced?

Situation: There’s a lot of talk suggesting that an “overpriced” stock market is headed for a fall. And sure, stocks do have rich valuations because the Federal Reserve has kept money cheap for 10 years and bonds don’t pay enough interest to compete for investor’s money (because the Federal Reserve bought up long-dated bonds). Now the Federal Reserve is determined to reverse those policies and investors are having to get used to the idea that stocks will revert to true value. But we have to specify which metrics define “overpriced” and use at least two of those before concluding that a particular stock is overpriced (see our blogs for the past two weeks).

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet, using colors in Columns Y and Z to highlight Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es that are overpriced (purple) or underpriced (green).

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: In the aggregate, the 32 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” have Graham Numbers that are more than 200% of their current valuation. This leaves room for at least a 50% fall from present prices. However, our confirmation metric does not support such a dire prediction: The average 7-Yr P/E is a little under the upper limit of the normal range for valuations (25). 

Stocks issued by some companies appear to clearly be overpriced, in that the Graham Number is more than twice the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is more than 30: TXN, ADP, UPS, HSY and CAT. Other companies appear to clearly be underpriced in that the Graham Number is less than the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is less than 25: CMCSA, PNC, ADM, PFG and MET. The fact that 5/32 stocks are overpriced and 5/32 stocks are underpriced is indicative of normal distribution (Bell Curve). So, we’ll use this approach often in future blogs.

Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 379 - Are “Blue Chip” Stocks Overvalued?

Situation: There are two subjective issues that we need to quantify for “buy and hold” investors: 1) Define a “blue chip” stock. 2) Define an “overvalued” stock. 

Our previous effort to define a “blue chip” stock in quantitative terms (see Week 361) left room for subjective interpretation and was more complicated than necessary. Here’s the new and improved definition: Any US-based company in the S&P 100 Index whose stock has been tracked by modern quantitative methods for 30+ years, and enjoys an S&P rating of B+/M or better. The very important final requirement is that the company issues bonds carrying an S&P rating of A- or better. 

In last week’s blog, we introduced two different quantitative methods for deciding whether or not a stock is overvalued: 1) the Graham Number, which sets an optimal price by using Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) and Earnings Per Share for the trailing 12 months (TTM); 2) the 7-Yr P/E, which removes aberrations that are introduced by “blowout earnings” or the negative impact on earnings that is often introduced by “mergers and acquisitions” and “company restructurings.” Either metric can be misleading if used alone, but that problem is largely negated when both are used together. 

Mission: Set up our Standard Spreadsheet for the 40 companies that meet criteria. Show the Graham Number in Columns X and the 7-Yr P/E in Column Z.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: In our original blog about Blue Chip stocks (Week 361), we thought the definition needed to require that companies pay a good and growing dividend. However, there are no objective reasons why a company’s stock will be of more value if profits are paid out piecemeal to investors rather than entirely in the form of capital gains. That’s one of the things you learn in business school from professors of Banking and Finance. Accounting professors also point out that a dividend is a mini-liquidation, as well as a second round of taxation on the company’s profits. There are subjective reasons to prefer companies that pay a good and growing dividend, like building brand value (an intangible asset) and showing that the company is “shareholder friendly.” Dividends also reduce risk by returning some of the original investment quickly with inflation-protected dollars.

Bottom Line: In the aggregate, these company’s shares are overpriced but not to an unreasonable degree (see Columns X-Z in the Table). However, only 8 are bargain-priced: Altria Group (MO), Comcast (CMCSA), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Bank of New York Mellon (BK), Wells Fargo (WFB), US Bancorp (USB), and Exxon Mobil (XOM). You’ll note that all 8 face challenges that will cause investors to pause before snapping up shares. 

Shares in 9 companies are overpriced by both metrics (Graham Number and 7-Yr P/E): Home Depot (HD), UnitedHealth (UNH), Lowe’s (LOW), Costco Wholesale (COST), Microsoft (MSFT), Texas Instruments (TXN), Raytheon (RTN), Honeywell International (HON), and Caterpillar (CAT). You’ll need to think about taking profits in those, if you’re a share-owner.

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, KO, JNJ, JPM, UNP, PG, WMT, CAT, XOM, and IBM. I also own shares of COST, MMM, BRK-B, and INTC.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 378 - Which “Dow Jones Industrial Average” Stocks Are Not Overpriced?

Situation: Is the US stock market overpriced? We need to know because Warren Buffett keeps reminding us how important it is to avoid overpaying for a stock. Buffet says: “No matter how successful a company is, don’t overpay for its stock. Wait until Wall Street sours on a company you like and drives the price down into bargain territory. By making a watch list of interesting stocks, and waiting for their prices to drop, you increase the potential for future capital gains.”
The author of this link suggests that none of us “mere mortals” are as smart as Warren Buffett at getting the price right. It’s perhaps better to either dollar-average your investment, or leave it to professionals to do the stock-picking for you. We suggest that there is a third option, which is to use a couple of simple mathematical formulas to guide your stock-picking. Those formulas can be found in the book that Warren Buffett calls “by far the best book on investing every written.” The book is entitled: The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, Revised Edition, Harper, New York, 1973. There, you will find the value of calculating the 7-year P/E instead of the usual 12-month P/E, and also learn how to calculate the “Graham Number.” The Graham Number is what the stock would sell for if it were priced at 1.5 times Book Value and 15 times trailing 12-month (TTM) earnings. Calculating and using the Graham Number is important because it allows for variation in Book Value and earnings. Multiplying the two values just has to be ~22.5 (15 X 1.5) for the stock to be optimally priced.

Mission: To test both methods on stocks issued by the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). See columns X, Y and Z on our Standard Spreadsheet (Table).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: Here’s how to calculate the Graham Number, as shown on p. 349 in the book cited above). [Clicking this link will take you to the Amazon website and the book).] Start by multiplying 1.5 (ideal ratio of Book Value/share) by 15 (ideal ratio of TTM Earnings/share) = 22.5. By multiplying two numbers you have created a Power Function. So, you’ll have to take the Square Root of the Final Number to arrive at the Graham Number. Final Number = 22.5 X actual Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (new) X actual TTM Earnings/share. To access Earnings/share, go to any company’s page at Yahoo Finance, e.g. Apple’s. In the right column find EPS (TTM) of $11.038. To access Book Value/share, click on “statistics” at the top of that page and scroll down the left column to “Balance Sheet.” Book Value/share for the most recent quarter (mrq) is the last entry: $23.74. Graham Number = square root of 22.5 X $11.038 X $23.74 = $76.79. This is the true value (Graham Number) for a single share of Apple stock. If it sells for less, that’s a bargain. Right now, it’s selling for almost 3 times as much. If you own some shares, either think about selling those or think about the company’s ability to scale-up the “Apple ecosystem”. Perhaps you’ll decide that those prospects make holding onto the shares for a while longer a worthwhile risk.

Calculating the 7-Yr P/E (p. 159 in the book cited above). You’ll need a website that provides the past 7 years of TTM earnings, or a library with S&P stock reports. Simply add the most recent 7 years’ earnings and divide by 7 to arrive at the denominator. Look up the current price of the stock (or its 50 Day Moving Average price found in the right column of the statistics page under “Stock Price History”) to arrive at the numerator. Divide numerator by denominator to calculate the 7-Yr P/E, which must be 25 or less to reflect “normative” earnings growth over 7 years for a stock with a 12-month P/E of ~20 during most years. By using the 7-yr P/E you avoid being mislead by a year of blowout earnings or negligible earnings.

Bottom Line: As a group, these 30 stocks are overpriced. Nonetheless, 12 companies have stocks that are priced within reason vs. their Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es (see Columns X-Z in the Table): TRV, DIS, WBA, INTC, VZ, JPM, PFE, PG, GS, UTX, CVX, XOM. But only one company, Goldman Sachs (GS), can be called a bargain with respect to both values (those values being highlighted in green in the Table). Note that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B at Line 35 in the Table) is an even better bargain. Perhaps Warren Buffett noticed these markers of high intrinsic value when he recently spent part of Berkshire Hathaway’s cash hoard to buy back the stock. 

Risk Rating: 5 where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into 3 stocks on the “not overpriced list” -- JPM, PG and XOM, and also own shares in two others: INTC and TRV. Additionally, I dollar-average into MSFT, KO, JNJ, WMT, CAT and IBM, and own shares in MCD, MMM and CSCO. 

Comment: I focus on Dow Stocks because each is covered by dozens of analysts and business journalists, and its stock options are actively traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The result of this microscopic attention is that price discovery is efficient, and surprise earnings are rare. In addition, all 30 companies have a long record of business experience, and are large enough to have multiple product lines that provide internal lines of support during a crisis. DJIA companies are famously able to weather almost any storm: Seven DJIA companies went through a near death experience during The Great Recession of 2008-2009 (General Electric, Citigroup, General Motors, Pfizer, Home Depot, Caterpillar, and American Express) but only 3 had to be removed in the aftermath of that “Lehman Panic” (General Electric, Citigroup, and General Motors).

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com.

Week 377 - Russell 1000 Non-financial Companies With High Sustainability and S&P Ratings

Situation: You’d like information about the durability of your investments. Sustainability is the jargon term that investment professionals have assigned to this topic. The problem is to quantify it by rating the 3 main components: Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG). The Yahoo Finance website now has a heading for sustainability that attempts to do exactly that. The editors of Barron’s also have a recent article looking more closely at the “100 Most Sustainable Companies”, with date suggesting that these may outperform the S&P 500 Index. We’d like to know which of those have also been examined by S&P. Specifically, which of those 100 Most Sustainable Companies have issued bonds that S&P has rated A or better?

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze all of the Barron’s “100 Most Sustainable Companies” that are on the Russell 1000 List, selecting only the non-financial companies that have an S&P bond rating of A or better, and an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better. To identify stocks that are possibly overpriced, include columns for “Graham Numbers” and “7-Yr P/E”.

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: 18 companies meet criteria, 14 of which already appear on our two major lists: “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 360); “Blue Chips” (see Week 361). The new companies are Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), WW Grainger (GWW), Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Deere (DE).

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT and PG, and also own shares of CSCO and CMI.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 373 - 10 Dividend Achievers In Defensive Industries That Are Suitable For Long-term Dollar-cost Averaging

Situation: Which asset class do you favor? Stocks, bonds, real estate or commodities? On a risk-adjusted basis, none of those are likely to grow your savings faster than inflation over the near term. You might want to hold off making “risk-on” investments, unless you're a speculator, because markets are likely to fluctuate more than usual. If you think a “risk-off” approach is best, then you need to pick “defensive” stocks for monthly (or quarterly) investment of a fixed dollar amount (dollar-cost averaging). To minimize transaction costs, you’ll want to invest automatically in each stock through an online Dividend Re-Investment Plan (DRIP). 

Now you will be positioned to ride-out a Bear Market, knowing that you’re accumulating an unusually large amount of shares in those companies as their stocks fall in price. And, those prices won’t fall far enough to scare you because that group of stocks has an above-market dividend yield. So, you’ll stick with the program instead of selling out in a moment of panic.

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for high-quality stocks issued by companies in defensive industries, i.e., utilities, consumer staples, healthcare, and communication services.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: Companies that don’t have at least an A- S&P rating on their bonds and at least a B+/M rating on their stock are excluded, as are those that don’t have at least a 16-yr trading record suitable for quantitative analysis by using the BMW Method. Companies that aren’t large enough to be on the Barron’s 500 List are also excluded.

Bottom Line: We find that 10 companies meet our requirements. Companies in the Consumer Staples industry dominate the list: Hormel Foods (HRL), Costco Wholesale (COST), PepsiCo (PDP), Coca-Cola (KO), Procter & Gamble (PG), Walmart (WMT), and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM). As a group, these 10 companies have above-market dividend yields and dividend growth (see Columns G & H in the Table). Risk is below-market, as expressed by 5-Yr Beta and predicted loss in a Bear Market (see Columns I & M). 

Risk Rating: 4 for the group as a whole (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, JNJ, PG and WMT, and also own shares of HRL and COST.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 372 - DJIA Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club”

Situation: The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is generally thought to be the most stable reflection of the stock market. As it should be. Those 30 companies are picked by the Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal to do exactly that. Here at ITR, we have our own, less subjective, measure of stability: companies that pay a good and growing dividend. In other words, companies with a dividend yield and dividend growth rate that are as good (or better than) the DJIA’s ~2% yield and ~8% growth rate. We propose that you pick such stocks out of the DJIA, thinking you’ll just have to do better than you would have done by investing in the Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) for the DJIA (DIA), which is called “Diamonds” for good reason. 

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 8 companies in the DJIA that are members of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 360).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: We have made two changes to “The 2 and 8 Club”: 1) Companies with a BBB+ S&P rating for their bonds are no longer accepted (see Column T in the Table); 2) all companies in the Russell 1000 Index that meet requirements (see Week 327) are included in “The 2 and 8 Club”(see Week 366). So, that phrase no longer refers specifically to companies in the S&P 100 Index.  

Bottom Line: These 8 stocks have performed remarkably well vs. DIA. Total Returns over the past 11 years (see Column C) were 26% greater, Finance Values (see Column E) were 25% better, dividend yields were almost 30% better (see Column G), dividend growth was almost 80 faster (see Column H), and the rate of price appreciation over the past 16 years was more than 70% faster (see Column K). So far so good, but the devil is in the details. We also measure risk. The story there is a bit shocking, even though these very stable companies were able to shake off challenges posed by the recent crash in commodity markets (see Column D). 

Five year price volatility was almost 25% greater (see Column I), P/E was twice as great (see Column J), and quantitative analysis of stock prices over the past 16 years predicts that losses will be almost 40% greater in the next Bear Market (see Column M). In other words, the risk-adjusted returns for these 8 companies are not significantly different than those for the DJIA. This conclusion is consistent with what we were taught in Business School, i.e., there are only two ways for a stock picker to “beat the market.” 1) use insider information (illegal), 2) take on more risk. Your best chance to beat the market without incurring more risk is to invest in the highest quality utilities, beverages, and pharmaceuticals (see Week 367).

Risk Rating: 6 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM and CSCO.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 371 - Know What You’re Buying: Graham Numbers for “The 2 and 8 Club”

Situation: Stock prices are a function of 3 variables: book value, earnings, and market sentiment. The first two numbers come from the company’s most recent quarterly report. Market sentiment drives the movement in buy and sell orders for a particular block of shares on a public exchange. In the days before electronic trading systems took over, traders would get together after work and make back-of-the-envelope calculations of future book values and earnings for stocks that interested them. This would give them an idea about the price at which the company’s stock would open the next morning. Benjamin Graham gave traders a starting point for those discussions on page 349, Chapter 14, of his book The Intelligent Investor (cf. the Revised Edition of 2003, annotated by Jason Zweig). There he makes clear that a rational price is the square root of 15 times earnings/share (EPS) and 1.5 times book value/share (BVPS), which is the square root of 22.5 X EPS x BVPS. For example, on June 18, 2018, JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) closed at $108.17, with EPS of $6.35 and BVPS of $72.00. The Graham Number equals the square root of (22.5 X 6.35 X 72 = 10,287) or $101.42. Conclusion: JPM is 6.66% overvalued ($108.17/$101.42 = 1.0666).  

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 22 companies in “The 2 and 8 Club” to include Graham Numbers.

Execution: see Columns Z and AA in this week’s Table.

Bottom Line: The average company on this list is overvalued by a factor of three (see Column AA), reflecting the end-of-times for the second longest Bull Market since the Great Depression. You have to ask yourself why you still own shares of a stock that is priced more than 3 times its fundamental value. Those reasons will always reflect market sentiment unless you know of a specific reason why earnings and book value are going increase above trend, and you’re almost certain it will play out that way.

Risk Rating: 7 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 370 - Ways To Win At Stock-picking #1: Dollar-cost Average Into 10 Of The 30 DJIA Companies

Situation: You’re troubled by the dominance of the S&P 500 Index. After all, it is a derivative and you wonder whether it is really the safest and most effective way to build retirement savings. Your biggest concern is that it is a capitalization-weighted index, which is a design that favors momentum investing: Mid-Cap companies that garner investor enthusiasm become included in the S&P 500 Index because their stock is appreciating; Mid-Cap companies that have managed to be included in the S&P 500 Index investors are in danger of being excluded because investors have lost their enthusiasm and the stock’s price is falling. Many investors buy/sell shares in a company’s stock because of that trend in sentiment. Fundamental sources of value (revenue, earnings, and cash flow) often have little to do with their enthusiasm, or the fact that it has evaporated. Articles in the business press may carry greater weight, and those articles may be influenced by analyses introduced by short sellers, who are betting on a fall in price, or hedge fund traders with long positions, who are betting on a rise in price. In other words, most retail investors are paying attention to market sentiment when buying or selling shares, not due diligence that comes from a careful study of a company’s prospects and Balance Sheet. 

Your second biggest concern is likely to be that few S&P 500 companies have a good credit rating backing their debts. In other words, they’re paying too high a rate of interest on the bonds they’ve issued, or the bank loans they’ve taken out. The company’s Net Tangible Book Value is therefore likely to be drifting deeper into negative territory because of interest expenses, part of which are no longer tax deductible due to changes in U.S. tax law.

Both of these problems fall by the wayside if you invest in the 30 companies that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average, either separately or together in the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DIA at Line 18 in the Table). Investing in the “Dow” may be a little smarter for retirement savers than investing in the S&P 500 Index (SPY at Line 16 in the Table) for two reasons: 1) DIA has a dividend yield that is ~10% greater; 2) DIA pays dividends monthly, whereas, SPY pays dividends quarterly. A higher dividend yield means that your original investment is returned to you more quickly, which translates as a higher net present value, if other factors (e.g. dividend growth and long-term price appreciation) are not materially different.

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to illustrate how I dollar-cost average into stocks issued by 10 DJIA companies.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: It has been necessary to use 3 separate Dividend Re-Investment Plans (DRIPs) to dollar-cost average into the 10 DJIA stocks I’ve chosen (see Column AE in the Table). Those DRIPs automatically extract $100 each month for each of the 10 stocks; transaction costs average $18.68/yr (see Column AD), which includes automatic reinvestment of dividends. The expense ratio is 1.56% for each year’s investments, but expenses relative to Net Asset Value fall to less than 0.01% after 10-20 years.

Bottom Line: This week’s blog compares my long-standing pick of 10 Dow stocks (for an automatic monthly investment of $100 each using an online DRIP) to investing $1500/qtr in the entire 30-stock index (DIA) using a regional broker-dealer, which is something I’ve just started doing to facilitate comparison going forward. (You’ll see each year’s total returns in future blogs published the first week of July.)  

Risk Rating: 6 (where U.S. Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10).

Full Disclosure: If one of the 10 stocks I’ve chosen is dropped from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I’ll sell those shares and use those dollars to start a DRIP with shares issued by another DJIA company.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 369 - High Quality Producers & Transporters of Industrial Commodities in the 2017 Barron’s 500

Situation: Here in the U.S., debt/capita is growing at an alarming rate and is now greater than $60,000. U.S. Government debt is almost $20 Trillion and has been growing at a rate of 5.5%/yr (i.e., twice as fast as inflation) since 1990. By 2020, the Federal budget deficit will start to exceed $1 Trillion/Yr and the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency will be threatened. The gold reserves that stand behind the U.S. dollar (currently worth ~$185 Billion) would have to be increased on a regular basis, as would foreign currency reserves (currently worth ~$125 Billion)

The US economy is no longer capable of growing fast enough to balance the budget for even a single year, without introducing draconian measures. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that those can be effective given that Greece appears to have emerged from that process successfully. But the U.S. could not go through that process and still remain the “top dog” militarily. So, the trade-weighted value of the U.S. dollar will fall at some point, and we will no longer be able to afford imported goods and services. Before that happens, U.S. citizens will need to gradually move their retirement savings into commodity-related investments, as well as bonds and stocks issued in reserve currencies other than the U.S. dollar. 

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight large U.S. and Canadian companies that produce, refine and transport raw commodities, i.e., materials that are extracted from the ground. Select such companies from the 2017 Barron’s 500 list, but exclude any that issue bonds with an S&P rating lower than A- or stocks with an S&P rating lower than B+/M. 

Execution: see Table.

Administration: The S&P Commodity Index has the following components and weightings:
Natural Gas (17.66%)
Unleaded Gas (12.16%)
Heating Oil (12.13%)
Crude Oil (11.41%)
Wheat (5.15%)
Live Cattle (4.87%)
Corn (4.48%)
Coffee (3.88%)
Soybeans (3.84%)
Sugar (3.80%)
Silver (3.67%)
Copper (3.39%)
Cotton (3.22%)
Soybean Oil (2.98%)
Cocoa (2.79%)
Soybean Meal (2.57%)
Lean Hogs (2.04%)

53.36% of the index represents petroleum products, 32.71% represents row crops, 7.06% represents industrial metals, and 6.91% represents live animals. Ground has to be mined, drilled, or planted & harvested with the help of heavy equipment to yield raw commodities. Those have to be transported by barge, rail, truck, or pipeline before being processed for market. 

We find 8 companies that warrant inclusion in this week’s Table. Seven are obviously appropriate, but the presence of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) needs some explanation (unless you already know it owns the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe railroad). Berkshire Hathaway is the largest shareholder of Phillips 66 (PSX), which has 13 oil refineries and supplies diesel for the largest marketing outlet of that fuel: Pilot Flying J Centers LLC. Berkshire Hathaway purchased 38.6% of that company’s stock on October 3, 2017, and plans to increase its stake in 2023 to 80%.

Bottom Line: Commodity futures haven’t been a good investment, given that their aggregate value is back to where it was 25 years ago, given that the most recent 20-year supercycle recently finished and another is just starting. Nonetheless, the companies that produce, process, and transport those commodities did well over those 25 years (see Column AB in Table). The problem is the volatility of their stocks (see Column M in the Table), and the extent to which their stocks get whacked when commodities become oversupplied relative to demand (see Column D in the Table). If you choose to own shares in these companies (aside from CNI, BRK-B and perhaps UNP), you’d be flat-out gambling. 

Risk Rating: 7-9 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into UNP, ADM, CAT and XOM, and also own shares of CNI and BRK-B.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 367 - Safe and Effective Stocks

Situation: The stock market is becalmed, waiting for wind to fill its sails. "Risk-On" investors seem to be out of ideas, except for a renewal of interest in the energy sector. The bond market is experiencing hard-to-predict volatility. Safe stocks that will grow your money effectively are hard to find. The formula for Net Present Value tells us that more value is found when your original investment is returned to you quickly. Therefore, an “effective” stock is one that pays a good and growing dividend. 

Mission: “Safe stocks” = an oxymoron. Basically, we’re looking for a group of high-quality stocks issued by companies in “defensive” industries (Utilities, HealthCare, Consumer Staples, and Communication Services). “Effective stocks” are those that a) pay an above-market dividend, b) grow that dividend at an above-market rate, and c) have an above-market 16-Yr CAGR. Our reference for the “market” is the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA). 

Execution: see Table.

Administration: What are “high-quality” stocks? Those are either “Blue Chips” (see Week 361) or members of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 327 and Week 348) plus its Extended Version (see Week 362). “Safe and effective” stocks are those that have no red highlights in Columns D, E, G, I, K, and M of the reference Tables. (Red highlights indicate underperformance vs. DIA.) In addition, we require that the company be a Dividend Achiever, and that its long-term bonds have an S&P rating of A- or better (see Column T).   

Bottom Line: We find that only 5 companies issue “safe and effective” stocks (see Table). Were you to own shares of similar value in all 5, you wouldn’t be gambling. In other words, your risk-adjusted returns would likely “beat the market” by 1-2%/yr over a market cycle. But your transaction costs would also be 1-2% higher vs. owning shares in the leading S&P 500 Index Fund (SPY).  

Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com