Month 112 - WATCH LIST: 28 A-rated Non-financial Companies in the iShares Top 200 Value ETF - October 2020

Situation: Savers eventually come to realize that they need to invest for income, to realize a positive return on investment (ROI). ROI is the most common profitability ratio.

    ROI is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the investment from the final value of the investment (which equals the net return), then dividing this new number (the net return) by the “cost of investment”, and, finally, multiplying by 100. For an asset in an investor’s portfolio, the “cost of investment” equals inflation + transaction costs.

Inflation is the only cost from owning Savings Bonds or an FDIC-insured savings account, there being no transaction costs. But savers typically incur a negative ROI because the interest rate credited to their account is almost always lower than the inflation rate, unless they bought Inflation-protected Savings Bonds.

The woke saver’s goal is to invest in assets that have low transaction costs but also have interest or dividend rates that cover inflation: stocks and bonds. An “investment-grade intermediate-term” bond fund, like the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index ETF (BND), is a suitable choice except during periods of hyperinflation. That’s because the value of bonds already held in the fund, referred to as “legacy” bonds, will fall when inflation is rising briskly. Why? Because the interest rate on legacy bonds will be lower than the rate of inflation. 

The dividend yield on stocks and stock ETFs could also lag behind rising inflation. However, the companies that pay those dividends usually grow their earnings and dividends faster during inflation, partly because the value of the dollar keeps falling. The investor’s ROI will likely remain positive, since it reflects growth in the stock’s price (from faster earnings growth) and growth in the dividend payout. 

Our saver, whom we now call an investor because she knows enough to seek out value (by looking to pay low transaction costs for apparently underpriced assets), will need to shop among different high-yielding assets to sustain ROI growth: 1) a bond-heavy “balanced” mutual fund like the Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX), 2) a high-yielding stock index ETF like the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund (VYM), and 3) individual stocks selected from the VYM portfolio. 

Mission: Analyze stocks in the iShares Top 200 Value Index ETF (IWX) that are also in VYM’s portfolio and meet these 5 criteria: have a) at least a 20-year trading record, b) an S&P bond rating of A- or higher, c) an S&P stock rating of B+/M or higher, d) a positive Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq), and e) positive earnings for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM). These criteria narrow your choices to a manageable but high quality Watch List. If you don’t have time to follow all 28 companies, confine your attention to the 21 companies that are also in the S&P 100 Index (see Column AR in the Table) or the 16 companies that are also in the 65-stock Dow Jones Composite Average (see Column AS in the Table).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: For comparison purposes, I list the 9 Financial Services companies separately because the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has promised to keep interest rates near zero through 2023. Financial Services companies profit from the “spread” between what they pay for money and what they make from that money. With interest rates for 15-year home mortgages moving lower than 2.5% and 5-year inflation rates moving higher than 1.8%, there is little profit potential on the horizon.

To calculate the annual ROI of a publicly-traded corporation, divide Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT line of Net Income statement) by Total Assets (at the bottom of the Balance Sheet statement). You want the most recent information available, which is ROI for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM). That is similarly calculated using the 4 most recent quarterly Net Income and Balance Sheet statements (see Column AT in the Table). 

Bottom Line: You’ll need to focus on large-capitalization stocks in your retirement account that pay a good and growing dividend. Why? There are 4 reasons: Those companies have 1) multiple product & service lines that likely can be managed to allow the company to continue growing earnings during a recession; 2) multi-billion dollar credit lines are already in place, 3) banking relationships are already in place that make it possible for each company to issue new long-term bonds with low interest rates during a recession, and 4) these companies are what you need to invest in, if you want to achieve total returns that come close to those achieved by the gold standard that we all measure our investment returns against, which are the capitalization-weighted S&P 500 Index ETFs like SPY (see Line 47 in the Table), which large brokers like Fidelity offer at negligible cost. 

Possible BUYs among Value Stocks (i.e. those with green highlights in both Column AD and Column AF of the Table). There are 9 such stocks: Pfizer (PFE), Cisco Systems (CSCO), Intel (INTC), American Electric Power (AEP), Duke Energy (DUK), Comcast (CMCSA), Southern (SO), Eaton PLC (ETN) and International Business Machines (IBM). The “possible BUYs” need to    1) not be overburdened with debt (see red highlights in Columns S-U of the Table);

  2) have a PEG ratio no greater than 2.5 (Column AI), and

  3) have high Returns On Tangible Capital Employed (Column O) and Returns On Investment (Column AT).

Intel (INTC) and Cisco Systems are the only ones that have a Return On Investment (TTM) greater than 15% (see Column AT in the Table). Findings: PFE, CMCSA and IBM are overburdened with debt; AEP, DUK, SO, ETN and IBM have high PEG ratios. The only remaining companies, CSCO and INTC, do have high returns (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) on Tangible Capital Employed and Total Assets (see Columns O and AT in the Table), and are therefore “possible BUYs.”

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Year US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MRK, PFE, INTC, PG, WMT, CAT, and also own shares of NEE, CSCO, TGT, DUK, KO, JNJ, CMCSA, SO, MMM IBM.

The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Month 110 - Buy Low! 12 A-rated Haven Stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced - August 2020

Situation: There’s no mystery to saving for retirement. A good working game plan is to divert 15-20% of your monthly income to the purchase of stocks and government bonds, and then keep those assets in a 60:40 balance of stocks:bonds. You can also use any bond substitutes (e.g. gold, T-bills, and utility stock ETFs) that typically hold their value in a stock market crash. Mainly use stock index ETFs for your retirement savings but also buy stock in companies that tend to have an above-market dividend yield. Those “shareholder-friendly payouts” happen because the company has good collateral: Liabilities are protected by Tangible Book Value and a cushion of Cash Equivalents. In other words, avoid stocks issued by companies that have become over-indebted. 

Think of the bonds in your portfolio as the collateral that backs your stocks. So, a good way to start saving for retirement is to over-emphasize collateral-thinking: Dollar-average into the low-cost Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX), which is 60% bonds and 40% stocks picked from the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF (VYM). VWINX has lost money in only 7 of the past 50 years, those losses always being less than 10%. Since its inception on 7/1/1970, VWINX has returned 9.7%/yr vs. 10.8%/yr for the S&P 500 Index with dividends reinvested.

The harder task is to stop putting additional money into stocks that have become overpriced. To do that you have to know how to calculate the Graham Number. Benjamin Graham wrote the first edition of The Intelligent Investor almost 100 years ago. It is hard to read because he uses numbers to express almost every pearl of knowledge. The “Graham Number” is simply the rational market price for any stock at any given moment, calculated as the square root of: 15 times earnings for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) multiplied by 1.5 times Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) multiplied by 22.5 (i.e., 1.5 times 15). So, the Graham Number is nothing more than what the stock’s price would be if it were to reflect a P/E of 15 and a Book Value of 1.5.  The purpose of doing this calculation on your stocks is to know their underlying worth. Benjamin Graham also explained why the 7-year P/E should not exceed 25, assuming that a single year’s P/E (TTM) should not exceed 20, which is an earnings yield of 5%/yr: In a normal inflationary environment, a company’s earnings are likely to grow 3% to 3.5% per year. After 7 years, a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 3.2%/yr takes a P/E of 20 to 25.

My definition of an Overpriced Stock is one that a) has a market price (50-day Moving Average) that is more than 2.5 times the Graham Number and b) has a 7-year P/E that is more than 30. Looking at the 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), I see that 5 A-rated stocks are overpriced (see Column AC-AH in Comparisons section of Table):

     Microsoft (MSFT), 

     Apple (AAPL), 

     Nike (NKE), 

     Coca-Cola (KO) and 

     Procter & Gamble (PG). 

Stocks get overpriced because they become popular with investors, leading to a Crowded Trade. Assuming that your goal is to Buy Low, why would you continue to add money to any of these 5 stocks that you already own? You would only do so because you harbor a Positive Sentiment regarding their future prospects, In other words, you would be making a speculative investment (“gambling”). To avoid gambling and instead employ a “risk-off” approach to buying individual stocks, you’ll need clear definitions for A-rated stocks and for Haven stocks to supplement the numbers-based system used above to avoid Overpriced stocks. You’ll also want to favor stocks issued by large companies, since those typically have multiple product lines and unencumbered lines of credit.

Mission: Define “A-rated stocks” and “Haven stocks”. Analyze A-rated Haven stocks in the S&P 100 Index that aren’t overpriced by using our Standard Spreadsheet.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: A-rated stocks are those that have a) an above market dividend yield (see portfolio of Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF - VYM), b) positive Book Value, c) positive earnings (TTM), d) an S&P rating on the company’s bonds that is A- or better, e) an S&P rating on the company’s stock that is B+/M or better, and f) a 20+ year trading history. 

Haven Stocks are A-rated stocks issued by companies that aren’t encumbered with risk factors that are likely to threaten the company’s solvency during a recession. So, companies in the Real Estate Industry (i.e., REITs) and companies in the Financial Services Industry (i.e., banks) are excluded, as are companies with negative Tangible Book Value if Total Debt is more than 2.5 times EBITDA (TTM) or Total Debt is more than 2.0 times Shareholder Equity. 

Bottom Line: With the S&P 500 Index being priced at 29 times TTM earnings (see SPY at Line 28 and Column K in the Table), the stock market is overpriced relative to its long-term P/E of 15-16. But its 50-day Moving Average price is still less than 2.5 times its Graham Number (i.e., 2.1), and its 7-yr P/E is still less than 30 (i.e., 28), per Columns AC and AE at Line 28 in the Table. Using our example of the DJIA, the timely thing to do would be to avoid buying more shares of the overpriced A-rated stocks (MSFT, NKE, PG, KO, AAPL) but to continue buying more shares of SPY. This strategy allows you to retain exposure to volatility in stocks that are Overpriced (because of their future prospects) while using diversification to reduce your risk of serious loss.

Risk Rating: 5 (where 10-yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, INTC, WMT, JNJ, CAT, and also own shares of MRK, CSCO, TGT, DUK, SO, MMM. From late February through April 2020, I added shares of 6 new companies to my brokerage account--Comcast (CMCSA), Costco Wholesale (COST), Home Depot (HD), Merck (MRK), Disney (DIS) and Target (TGT), while selling shares of Norfolk Southern (NSC) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Regarding the 5 overpriced but A-rated stocks in the DJIA, I’ve stopped dollar-averaging into KO but continue to dollar-average into MSFT, NKE and PG because I expect those companies to continue to dominate their competitors. I have no plans to sell the shares of KO and AAPL that I already own.

The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Month 106 - A-rated Value Stocks in the S&P 100 Index - April 2020

Situation: Growth at a reasonable price (GARP) is often mentioned as an investing goal because value underlies the decision to buy. Warren Buffett is the king of value investing and has over $80 Billion in cash (his “elephant gun”) that he’d like to spend. We’re in a Bear Market fueled by the adverse economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. So, he’ll soon spend that cash pile to buy a large company. Let’s look at his options, considering the ways he has prioritized purchases in the past. Firstly, he likes large and long-established companies. Why large companies? Because those have multiple product lines, one of which is usually designed to help the company maintain a stream of revenue during a recession. In addition, those companies are large enough to have the marketing power needed to maintain and grow their brands. 

Mission: Let’s see which choices look attractive among A-rated “haven stocks” in the S&P 100 Index (see Month 104). Remember: These companies reliably pay an above-market dividend, so they’re found in the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index (VYM), and they’re also listed in the iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). Warren Buffett places high store in companies that don’t overuse debt and also retain Tangible Book Value, so we’ll exclude companies with negative Tangible Book Value that also have a total debt load greater than 2.5 times EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation & Amortization) or have sold long-term bonds to build more than 50% of their market capitalization. Finally, the company's stock price has to meet both of our two value criteria: 1) Share price isn't more than twice the Graham Number; 2) share price isn't more than 25 times average 7-yr earnings per share. 

Execution: (see Table).

Administration: These 9 companies include 4 from the two most deeply cyclical industries: banks and semiconductor manufacturers. Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio already includes the 3 banks on the list, i.e., JPMorgan Chase (JPM), U.S. Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo (WFC) but doesn’t include the semiconductor manufacturer, Intel (INTC). Berkshire Hathaway is at heart an insurance company, so Warren Buffett always needs to diversify away from the Financial Services industry. There are only 4 non-financial companies on the list: Intel (INTC), Cisco Systems (CSCO), Pfizer (PFE), and Target (TGT), and only TGT is within the price range that Mr. Buffett is looking to spend ($80 to $100 Billion). 

Bottom Line: Target (TGT) appears to be the most attractive company to add to Berkshire’s stable, given that it is priced right and Mr. Buffett already has experience owning companies in the Consumer Discretionary industry.. 

Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-yr U.S. Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold = 10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into INTC and JPM, and also own shares of PFE, CSCO, TGT, USB, BLK and WFC.

The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Month 94 - Food and Agriculture Companies - Spring 2019 Update

Situation: Investors should pay attention to asset classes that fluctuate in value out-of-sync with the S&P 500 Index. Such asset classes are said to have minimal or negative “correlation” with large-capitalization US stocks. Emerging markets and raw commodities are important examples. Those are a natural pair, given that most countries in the emerging markets group have an economy that is based on the production of one or more raw commodities. 

The idea that you can find a safe haven for your savings, one which will allow you to ride out a crash in the US stock market, is a pleasant fiction. Articles in support of that idea are published almost daily. But unless you are a trader who can afford to rent or buy a $500,000 seat on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, you probably aren’t deft enough to arbitrage the various risks accurately enough before they develop (and at low enough transaction costs) to avoid losing money in a crash. 

If you really want to ride out most crashes, invest in a bond-heavy balanced mutual fund that is managed by real humans. The Vanguard Group offers one best, and it comes with very low transaction fees (Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund or VWINX). To refresh yourself on the competitive advantages of investing in food and agriculture companies, see our most recent blog on the subject (see Month 91). To refresh yourself on the competitive disadvantages, study this month’s Table and Bottom Line carefully.

The essential fact is that economies require money for spending and investment. That comes down to having consumers who are confident enough about their employment prospects and entrepreneurs who are confident enough about their ability to invest. Those consumers and entrepreneurs can be relied upon to transfer their successes to the larger economy by saving money, taking out loans, and paying taxes. National economies are interlinked. Because of the size and innovation of its marketplace, the US economy is the main enabler for most of the other national economies. Logic would suggest that the valuation for any asset class will roughly track the ups and downs of the S&P 500 Index, either as a first derivative or second derivative. 

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze US and Canadian food and agriculture companies that carry at least a BBB rating on their bonds (see Column R).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: Of the 25 companies listed in the Table, only one meets Warren Buffett’s criteria of low beta (see Column I), low volatility (Column M), high quality (Column S), strong balance sheet (Columns N-R), and TTM (Trailing Twelve Month) earnings plus mrq (most recent quarter) Book Values that yield a Graham Number which is not far from the stock’s current Price (Column Y). That company is Berkshire Hathaway. We use a Basic Quality Screen that is less stringent as his: 1) an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better (Column S), 2) an S&P bond rating of BBB+ or better (Column R), 3) 16-Yr price volatility (Column M) that is less than 3 times the rate of price appreciation (Column K), and 4) a positive dollar amount for net present value (Column W) when using a 10-Yr holding period in combination with a 10% discount rate (to reflect a 10% Required Rate of Return).

Bottom Line: Only 8 companies on the list pass our Basic Quality Screen (see Administration above): HRL, COST, PEP, KO, DE, FAST, CNI, UNP. At the opposite end of the spectrum, 9 companies have a below-market S&P bond rating of BBB. So, those stocks represent outright gambles. 

Aside from Berkshire Hathaway, none of the 25 companies can be said to issue a reasonably priced “value” stock. We’re dealing with 24 “growth” stocks, only a third of which are of high quality. Three of the 9 with BBB bond ratings have high total debt levels relative to EBITDA (see Column O in the Table) that are unprotected by Tangible Book Value (Column P): SJM, MKC, GIS. The good news is that only one of the 9 appears to be overpriced, and that company (MKC) is a quasi-monopoly that has little risk of bankruptcy because it has “cornered” the US spice market. 

In summary, you can do well by investing in this space as long as you understand that you’re dealing with a fragmented food industry, one that is flush with companies of dubious quality. You might like to be well-informed about these companies because food, like fuel, is an essential good, and the food industry enjoys steady growth. Why? Because the number of people in Asia & Africa who can afford to consume 50 grams of protein per day grows by tens of millions per year.

Risk Rating: ranges from 6 to 8 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion =10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into TSN, KO and UNP, and also own shares of AMZN, HRL, MO, MKC, BRK-B, CAT and WMT.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 390 - REITs That Qualify For "The 2 and 8 Club"

Situation: Membership in “The 2 and 8 Club” is based on the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which consists of the ~400 companies in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index that reliably pay an above-market dividend. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are excluded from the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index because their dividend payouts are variable, being fixed by law at 95% of gross income. But those payouts are usually higher than the yield on an S&P 500 ETF (e.g. SPY), which is ~2%. We are curious as to whether any REITs meet the 5 basic requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”, and find that there are 4 (see Table). However, REITs are typically “small cap stocks.” Only one of the four in our Table is a large enough company to be included in the FTSE Russell 1000 Index (Simon Property Group; SPG).

Mission: Populate our Standard Spreadsheet for REITs. Select only those that meet the 5 basic requirements for membership in “The 2 and 8 Club”:
   1) above-market dividend yield;
   2) 5-Yr dividend growth of at least 8.0%/yr;
   3) a 16+ year trading record that is analyzed weekly for quantitative metrics by the BMW Method;
   4) an S&P Bond Rating of BBB+ or higher;
   5) an S&P Stock Rating of B+/M or higher.
Add a column for FFO (Funds From Operations; see Column P in the Table), which is a ratio that the REIT Industry substitutes for P/E. 

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: Pricing for REITs is negatively correlated with rising interest rates but not as much as you might suspect. This is likely because the dividend yield for most REITs remains above the interest rate on a 10-Yr US Treasury Note. Pricing is more sensitive to the likelihood that the REIT will have enough FCF (Free Cash Flow) to fund dividend payouts (see Column R in the Table). Overall, it is hard to argue against the idea that high-quality REITs are a good “bond substitute.” 

Risk Rating: 4 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Note = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into SPG and own shares of KIM.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 389 - Bond ETFs

Situation: You want to balance your stock portfolio with safe bonds. Right? Well, here’s a news flash: You need to start thinking about balancing your bond portfolio with safe stocks. Why? Because the world is gorging itself on debt--households, municipalities, states, nations, and corporations most of all. Yes, this is understandable because the Great Recession was so disabling that central banks everywhere dropped interest rates lower than the rate of inflation. It was free money, so people borrowed the stuff and invested it. Just as the central bankers had intended. Economic activity gradually returned to normal almost everywhere, now that 10 years have passed since Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. But the Federal Open Market Committee is removing the punch bowl from the party and raising short-term interest rates by a quarter percent 3-4 times a year. Bondholders are stocking up on Advil due to interest rate risk (duration), meaning that for each 1% rise in short-term interest rates there is a material reduction in the value of an existing bond that is worse for long-term than short-term bonds. 

If a company is struggling and has to refinance a maturing issue of long-term debt, it will have to pay a materially higher rate of interest vs. that paid to holders of the expiring bond. This may impact the credit rating of its existing bonds, driving it closer to insolvency. General Electric (GE) is an especially vivid example of how this works. A few short years ago, GE had an S&P rating of AAA for its bonds. That rating is now BBB+ and falling fast. Larry Culp, the CEO, is desperately selling off core divisions of the company in an attempt to avert bankruptcy. 

Mission: Use appropriate columns of our Standard Spreadsheet to evaluate the leading bond ETFs, and compare those to the S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY) as well as a stock with an S&P Bond Rating of AA or better.

Execution: see Table. 

Bottom Line: To offset the risks in your stock portfolio (bankruptcy, market crashes and sensitivity to fluctuation of interest rates), you need a bond portfolio. Why? Because high quality bonds rise in value during stock market crashes and/or recessions, have much less credit risk, and usually less interest rate risk. Stock prices are more sensitive to short-term interest rates than any but the longest-dated bonds, e.g. 30-Yr US Treasury Bonds. Stock indexes like the S&P 500 Index (SPY) have average S&P Bond Ratings of BBB to BBB+, compared to AA+ for 30-Yr Treasuries. To cover those risks, you’ll need a bond fund that has low-medium interest rate risk and high credit quality. BND and IEF are examples (see Table). BIV differs only in having medium credit quality per Morningstar. TLT has high credit quality but also has high interest rate sensitivity. TLT can be compared to a stock with high credit quality and high interest rate sensitivity, e.g. Pfizer (PFE; see Table). The main thing to remember is that stock market crashes are invariably accompanied by a booming bond market (flight to safety). That’s a good thing because governments will have to take on a lot more debt to finance social programs like unemployment insurance.

Risk Rating: 1 for BND and IEF (where 10-Yr Treasuries = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold = 10)

Full Disclosure: I own bond funds that approximate BIV and TLT.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 386 - Retirement Savings Plan For The Self-Employed

Situation: Let’s follow the Kiss Rule (Keep It Simple, Stupid). There are many jobs that don’t offer a workplace retirement plan. For example, if you’re a long-haul truck driver and own your Class 8 tractor, i.e., you’re an “Owner/Operator”, you make over $100,000 per year but have high expenses. As an S corporation, you don’t pay taxes on the 15% of gross income that you try to set aside for retirement. 

How do you invest it? If you follow the KISS Rule, you’re best off putting all of it in Vanguard’s Wellesley Income Fund. That fund has an expense ratio of 0.22% and is half stocks and half bonds. The ~70 stocks are selected from the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index (i.e., the ~400 companies in the Russell 1000 Index that reliably pay an above-market dividend). You’ll recognize that Index as the same source we use to pick stocks for “The 2 and 8 Club”.

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet using the 10 stocks that reliably pay good and growing dividends and are less likely to fall as much as the Dow Jones Industrial Average in a Bear Market. Compare that portfolio to the Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWINX), the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VYM), and the SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (SPY). 

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: If you’re self-employed (e.g. do seasonal work), you need a flexible retirement plan with low transaction costs. Safety is the main goal. Take no risks! If you want to pick your own stocks, all right. You can keep costs for that low by dollar-averaging but then your bonds have to be very low risk, i.e., US Savings Bonds.

Risk Rating: 4

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, T, JNJ and DIA, and also own shares of HRL.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 380 - Are Stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” Overpriced?

Situation: There’s a lot of talk suggesting that an “overpriced” stock market is headed for a fall. And sure, stocks do have rich valuations because the Federal Reserve has kept money cheap for 10 years and bonds don’t pay enough interest to compete for investor’s money (because the Federal Reserve bought up long-dated bonds). Now the Federal Reserve is determined to reverse those policies and investors are having to get used to the idea that stocks will revert to true value. But we have to specify which metrics define “overpriced” and use at least two of those before concluding that a particular stock is overpriced (see our blogs for the past two weeks).

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet, using colors in Columns Y and Z to highlight Graham Numbers and 7-Yr P/Es that are overpriced (purple) or underpriced (green).

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: In the aggregate, the 32 stocks in “The 2 and 8 Club” have Graham Numbers that are more than 200% of their current valuation. This leaves room for at least a 50% fall from present prices. However, our confirmation metric does not support such a dire prediction: The average 7-Yr P/E is a little under the upper limit of the normal range for valuations (25). 

Stocks issued by some companies appear to clearly be overpriced, in that the Graham Number is more than twice the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is more than 30: TXN, ADP, UPS, HSY and CAT. Other companies appear to clearly be underpriced in that the Graham Number is less than the stock’s price and the 7-Yr P/E is less than 25: CMCSA, PNC, ADM, PFG and MET. The fact that 5/32 stocks are overpriced and 5/32 stocks are underpriced is indicative of normal distribution (Bell Curve). So, we’ll use this approach often in future blogs.

Risk Rating: 7 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM, CSCO and CMI.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 379 - Are “Blue Chip” Stocks Overvalued?

Situation: There are two subjective issues that we need to quantify for “buy and hold” investors: 1) Define a “blue chip” stock. 2) Define an “overvalued” stock. 

Our previous effort to define a “blue chip” stock in quantitative terms (see Week 361) left room for subjective interpretation and was more complicated than necessary. Here’s the new and improved definition: Any US-based company in the S&P 100 Index whose stock has been tracked by modern quantitative methods for 30+ years, and enjoys an S&P rating of B+/M or better. The very important final requirement is that the company issues bonds carrying an S&P rating of A- or better. 

In last week’s blog, we introduced two different quantitative methods for deciding whether or not a stock is overvalued: 1) the Graham Number, which sets an optimal price by using Book Value for the most recent quarter (mrq) and Earnings Per Share for the trailing 12 months (TTM); 2) the 7-Yr P/E, which removes aberrations that are introduced by “blowout earnings” or the negative impact on earnings that is often introduced by “mergers and acquisitions” and “company restructurings.” Either metric can be misleading if used alone, but that problem is largely negated when both are used together. 

Mission: Set up our Standard Spreadsheet for the 40 companies that meet criteria. Show the Graham Number in Columns X and the 7-Yr P/E in Column Z.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: In our original blog about Blue Chip stocks (Week 361), we thought the definition needed to require that companies pay a good and growing dividend. However, there are no objective reasons why a company’s stock will be of more value if profits are paid out piecemeal to investors rather than entirely in the form of capital gains. That’s one of the things you learn in business school from professors of Banking and Finance. Accounting professors also point out that a dividend is a mini-liquidation, as well as a second round of taxation on the company’s profits. There are subjective reasons to prefer companies that pay a good and growing dividend, like building brand value (an intangible asset) and showing that the company is “shareholder friendly.” Dividends also reduce risk by returning some of the original investment quickly with inflation-protected dollars.

Bottom Line: In the aggregate, these company’s shares are overpriced but not to an unreasonable degree (see Columns X-Z in the Table). However, only 8 are bargain-priced: Altria Group (MO), Comcast (CMCSA), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Bank of New York Mellon (BK), Wells Fargo (WFB), US Bancorp (USB), and Exxon Mobil (XOM). You’ll note that all 8 face challenges that will cause investors to pause before snapping up shares. 

Shares in 9 companies are overpriced by both metrics (Graham Number and 7-Yr P/E): Home Depot (HD), UnitedHealth (UNH), Lowe’s (LOW), Costco Wholesale (COST), Microsoft (MSFT), Texas Instruments (TXN), Raytheon (RTN), Honeywell International (HON), and Caterpillar (CAT). You’ll need to think about taking profits in those, if you’re a share-owner.

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, NEE, KO, JNJ, JPM, UNP, PG, WMT, CAT, XOM, and IBM. I also own shares of COST, MMM, BRK-B, and INTC.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 377 - Russell 1000 Non-financial Companies With High Sustainability and S&P Ratings

Situation: You’d like information about the durability of your investments. Sustainability is the jargon term that investment professionals have assigned to this topic. The problem is to quantify it by rating the 3 main components: Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG). The Yahoo Finance website now has a heading for sustainability that attempts to do exactly that. The editors of Barron’s also have a recent article looking more closely at the “100 Most Sustainable Companies”, with date suggesting that these may outperform the S&P 500 Index. We’d like to know which of those have also been examined by S&P. Specifically, which of those 100 Most Sustainable Companies have issued bonds that S&P has rated A or better?

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to analyze all of the Barron’s “100 Most Sustainable Companies” that are on the Russell 1000 List, selecting only the non-financial companies that have an S&P bond rating of A or better, and an S&P stock rating of B+/M or better. To identify stocks that are possibly overpriced, include columns for “Graham Numbers” and “7-Yr P/E”.

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: 18 companies meet criteria, 14 of which already appear on our two major lists: “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 360); “Blue Chips” (see Week 361). The new companies are Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), WW Grainger (GWW), Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Deere (DE).

Risk Rating: 6 (where 10-Yr US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT and PG, and also own shares of CSCO and CMI.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 376 - What Does A Simple IRA Look Like?

Situation: You’re bombarded with advice about how to save for retirement. But unless you’re already rich, the details are simple. Dollar-cost average 60% of your contribution into a stock index fund and 40% into a short or intermediate-term bond index fund. If you know you’ll never be in “the upper middle class”, opt for the short-term bond index fund. But maybe you have a workplace retirement plan, which makes saving for retirement a little more complicated. Either way, you’ll want to contribute the maximum amount each year to your IRA, which is currently $5500/yr until you reach age 50; then it’s $6500/yr.

Here’s our KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) suggestion: Make your IRA payments with Vanguard Group by using a Simple IRA (Vanguard terminology) composed only of the Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF or VYM. Then, contribute 2/3rds of that amount into Inflation-protected US Savings Bonds. These are called ISBs and work just like an IRA. No tax is due from ISBs until you spend the money but there’s a penalty for spending the money early (you’ll lose one interest payment if you cash out before 5 years). The annual contribution limit is $10,000/yr. A convenient proxy for ISBs, with similar total returns, is the Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index ETF or BSV. 

Mission: Create a Table showing a 60% allocation to VYM and 40% allocation to BSV. Include appropriate benchmarks, to allow the reader to create her own variation on that theme.

Execution: see Table.

Bottom Line: However you juggle the numbers, it looks like you’ll make ~7%/yr overall through your IRA + ISB retirement plan, with no taxes due until you spend the money. In other words, each year’s contribution will double in value every 10 years. The beauty of this plan is that transaction costs are almost zero, and the chance that it will give you headaches is almost zero.

Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into Inflation-protected Savings Bonds and the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 372 - DJIA Companies in “The 2 and 8 Club”

Situation: The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is generally thought to be the most stable reflection of the stock market. As it should be. Those 30 companies are picked by the Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal to do exactly that. Here at ITR, we have our own, less subjective, measure of stability: companies that pay a good and growing dividend. In other words, companies with a dividend yield and dividend growth rate that are as good (or better than) the DJIA’s ~2% yield and ~8% growth rate. We propose that you pick such stocks out of the DJIA, thinking you’ll just have to do better than you would have done by investing in the Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) for the DJIA (DIA), which is called “Diamonds” for good reason. 

Mission: Run our Standard Spreadsheet for the 8 companies in the DJIA that are members of “The 2 and 8 Club” (see Week 360).

Execution: see Table.

Administration: We have made two changes to “The 2 and 8 Club”: 1) Companies with a BBB+ S&P rating for their bonds are no longer accepted (see Column T in the Table); 2) all companies in the Russell 1000 Index that meet requirements (see Week 327) are included in “The 2 and 8 Club”(see Week 366). So, that phrase no longer refers specifically to companies in the S&P 100 Index.  

Bottom Line: These 8 stocks have performed remarkably well vs. DIA. Total Returns over the past 11 years (see Column C) were 26% greater, Finance Values (see Column E) were 25% better, dividend yields were almost 30% better (see Column G), dividend growth was almost 80 faster (see Column H), and the rate of price appreciation over the past 16 years was more than 70% faster (see Column K). So far so good, but the devil is in the details. We also measure risk. The story there is a bit shocking, even though these very stable companies were able to shake off challenges posed by the recent crash in commodity markets (see Column D). 

Five year price volatility was almost 25% greater (see Column I), P/E was twice as great (see Column J), and quantitative analysis of stock prices over the past 16 years predicts that losses will be almost 40% greater in the next Bear Market (see Column M). In other words, the risk-adjusted returns for these 8 companies are not significantly different than those for the DJIA. This conclusion is consistent with what we were taught in Business School, i.e., there are only two ways for a stock picker to “beat the market.” 1) use insider information (illegal), 2) take on more risk. Your best chance to beat the market without incurring more risk is to invest in the highest quality utilities, beverages, and pharmaceuticals (see Week 367).

Risk Rating: 6 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, gold bullion = 10).

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into MSFT, JPM, CAT and IBM, and also own shares of TRV, MMM and CSCO.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 369 - High Quality Producers & Transporters of Industrial Commodities in the 2017 Barron’s 500

Situation: Here in the U.S., debt/capita is growing at an alarming rate and is now greater than $60,000. U.S. Government debt is almost $20 Trillion and has been growing at a rate of 5.5%/yr (i.e., twice as fast as inflation) since 1990. By 2020, the Federal budget deficit will start to exceed $1 Trillion/Yr and the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency will be threatened. The gold reserves that stand behind the U.S. dollar (currently worth ~$185 Billion) would have to be increased on a regular basis, as would foreign currency reserves (currently worth ~$125 Billion)

The US economy is no longer capable of growing fast enough to balance the budget for even a single year, without introducing draconian measures. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that those can be effective given that Greece appears to have emerged from that process successfully. But the U.S. could not go through that process and still remain the “top dog” militarily. So, the trade-weighted value of the U.S. dollar will fall at some point, and we will no longer be able to afford imported goods and services. Before that happens, U.S. citizens will need to gradually move their retirement savings into commodity-related investments, as well as bonds and stocks issued in reserve currencies other than the U.S. dollar. 

Mission: Use our Standard Spreadsheet to highlight large U.S. and Canadian companies that produce, refine and transport raw commodities, i.e., materials that are extracted from the ground. Select such companies from the 2017 Barron’s 500 list, but exclude any that issue bonds with an S&P rating lower than A- or stocks with an S&P rating lower than B+/M. 

Execution: see Table.

Administration: The S&P Commodity Index has the following components and weightings:
Natural Gas (17.66%)
Unleaded Gas (12.16%)
Heating Oil (12.13%)
Crude Oil (11.41%)
Wheat (5.15%)
Live Cattle (4.87%)
Corn (4.48%)
Coffee (3.88%)
Soybeans (3.84%)
Sugar (3.80%)
Silver (3.67%)
Copper (3.39%)
Cotton (3.22%)
Soybean Oil (2.98%)
Cocoa (2.79%)
Soybean Meal (2.57%)
Lean Hogs (2.04%)

53.36% of the index represents petroleum products, 32.71% represents row crops, 7.06% represents industrial metals, and 6.91% represents live animals. Ground has to be mined, drilled, or planted & harvested with the help of heavy equipment to yield raw commodities. Those have to be transported by barge, rail, truck, or pipeline before being processed for market. 

We find 8 companies that warrant inclusion in this week’s Table. Seven are obviously appropriate, but the presence of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) needs some explanation (unless you already know it owns the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe railroad). Berkshire Hathaway is the largest shareholder of Phillips 66 (PSX), which has 13 oil refineries and supplies diesel for the largest marketing outlet of that fuel: Pilot Flying J Centers LLC. Berkshire Hathaway purchased 38.6% of that company’s stock on October 3, 2017, and plans to increase its stake in 2023 to 80%.

Bottom Line: Commodity futures haven’t been a good investment, given that their aggregate value is back to where it was 25 years ago, given that the most recent 20-year supercycle recently finished and another is just starting. Nonetheless, the companies that produce, process, and transport those commodities did well over those 25 years (see Column AB in Table). The problem is the volatility of their stocks (see Column M in the Table), and the extent to which their stocks get whacked when commodities become oversupplied relative to demand (see Column D in the Table). If you choose to own shares in these companies (aside from CNI, BRK-B and perhaps UNP), you’d be flat-out gambling. 

Risk Rating: 7-9 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into UNP, ADM, CAT and XOM, and also own shares of CNI and BRK-B.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2018 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com

Week 368 - Are You A Baby Boomer (54 to 72 years old) With Only $25,000 In Retirement Savings?

Situation: Here in the United States, a third of you have less than $25,000 in Retirement Savings.

Mission: Assess options for a healthy married couple with a household income of $59,000/yr, whose breadwinner will retire when he or she reaches age 66 and the household starts receiving an initial Social Security check of $2,123/mo . Assume that they have $25,000 in retirement savings in an IRA, with an initial payout of $75/mo.

Execution: see Table.

Administration: The options for the couple to receive an income from their $25,000 IRA are unattractive. They’ll need a relatively safe way to come up with an income of 3-4%/yr from that $25,000, a way that grows the principal at least as fast as inflation (historically 3.1%/yr). That growth rate can be predicted from the 5-yr growth rate for the quarterly dividend. To have enough confidence in that stream of income, their only option is to find half a dozen high-quality stocks with low price variance (5-yr Beta less than 0.7) and secure dividends. 

They should be able to live reasonably well on $2,198/mo, given that the poverty line for a household of two is $1,372/mo. But let’s break it down: They’ll pay at least $900/mo for housing (rent, tenant’s insurance, and utilities), so they’re left with $1,300/mo to cover the consumer price index categories of food and beverages, apparel, transportation, medical care, recreation, education and communication, and other goods and services. “Other goods and services” include restaurant meals, delivery services, and cigarettes. Food will cost at least $250/mo. Now they’re down to ~$1,050/mo to cover clothing, car expenses, Medicare premium plus deductibles and co-payments, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. Owning, maintaining, and operating a used car for 5,000 miles/yr will cost ~$625/mo, which leaves $425/mo for clothing, healthcare, smartphones, meals out, vacations, delivery services, and cigarettes. To avoid selling the car, one of them will need to find a part-time job. New clothes, dining out, and travel will be hard to fund. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs will go up, so they’ll need to save money by avoiding alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, and sweets. 

Bottom Line: When a couple is facing a retirement that will be funded only by the average Social Security payout at full retirement age ($25,476/yr), they won’t be living much above the Federal Poverty Level for a household of two ($16,460/yr). It they own a home, they’ll no longer be able to afford to maintain it and pay property taxes. So, they’ll need to sell it and invest the residual equity. Maintaining their car will barely be affordable. Having $25,000 in an IRA will help, but a third of couples in their situation will retire with an even smaller cushion. In our Table for this week, we show how $75/mo is the expected income from an IRA of $25,000 value that has an average dividend yield of 3.6%/yr.

Risk Rating: 4 (where US Treasury Notes = 1, S&P 500 Index = 5, and gold bullion = 10)

Full Disclosure: I dollar-average into NEE, KO, and JNJ.

"The 2 and 8 Club" (CR) 2017 Invest Tune Retire.com All rights reserved.

Post questions and comments in the box below or send email to: irv.mcquarrie@InvestTuneRetire.com